proxmox-mirrors/mirror_frr
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr synced 2025-08-14 16:04:49 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tests: [topojson] Update assert/error messages

Browse Source 
Few assert/error messages are updated for test
scripts for better debugging.

Signed-off-by: nguggarigoud <nguggarigoud@vmware.com>
This commit is contained in:
nguggarigoud 2023-01-16 22:34:06 -08:00 committed by Naveen Guggarigoudar
parent 2273550f04
commit 74dd0c84db
23 changed files with 568 additions and 644 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

520
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_asbr_summary_topo1.py
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

22
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_asbr_summary_type7_lsa.py
View File

@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -248,11 +248,9 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r0 = {
"r0": {
@ -272,9 +270,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
"route is sent to R1."
)
step(
"Configure summary & redistribute static/connected route with " "metric type 2"
)
step("Configure summary & redistribute static/connected route with metric type 2")
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv4"][3]}]}}
dut = "r1"
@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -301,7 +297,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Learn type 7 lsa from neighbours")
@ -325,7 +321,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r0 = {
"r0": {
@ -353,7 +349,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that already originated summary is intact.")
input_dict = {
@ -369,7 +365,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r1"
aggr_timer = {"r1": {"ospf": {"aggr_timer": 6}}}

44
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_authentication.py
View File

@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
step("Verify that the neighbour is not FULL between R1 and R2.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
"show ip ospf neighbor cmd."
)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=6
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
"show ip ospf neighbor cmd."
)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

32
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_chaos.py
View File

@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
dut = "r0"
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after restarting R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after restarting R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

20
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_ecmp.py
View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 2 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

12
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_ecmp_lan.py
View File

@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r0"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

12
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_lan.py
View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -209,9 +209,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, lan=True)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -247,9 +245,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, lan=True)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 150 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
step("Configure DR pririty 150 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -368,7 +364,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, lan=True, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

6
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_nssa.py
View File

@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ def test_ospf_learning_tc15_p0(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area" " type on DUT).")
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area type on DUT).")
for rtr in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
input_dict = {

40
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py
View File

@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -214,9 +214,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
redistribute_ospf(tgen, topo, "r0", "static", delete=True)
step(
"Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix &" " deny 10.0.20.2/32"
)
step("Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix & deny 10.0.20.2/32")
# Create ip prefix list
pfx_list = {
@ -307,7 +305,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -316,7 +314,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -360,7 +358,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -369,7 +367,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -417,7 +415,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -426,7 +424,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -477,7 +475,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, retry_timeout=4, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -492,7 +490,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -512,7 +510,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -521,7 +519,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -536,7 +534,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -545,7 +543,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -566,7 +564,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -575,7 +573,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -874,7 +872,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -943,7 +941,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1091,7 +1089,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc25_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

10
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_rte_calc.py
View File

@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc6_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc8_p1(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are reset and forms new adjacencies.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ def test_ospf_rfc2328_appendinxE_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are Full.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

44
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_single_area.py
View File

@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ def test_ospf_p2p_tc3_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether BGP is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ def test_ospf_show_p1(request):
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
dut = "r1"
@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1" "dead interval timer on r2")
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1 dead interval timer on r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
@ -727,11 +727,11 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to " "default on r1 and r2")
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to default on r1 and r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
"links": {
@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -848,9 +848,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf": {"timerDeadSecs": 40}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -896,18 +894,14 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
"instead of Exstart. Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
)
step(
"Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip " "ospf interface."
)
step("Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip ospf interface.")
dut = "r0"
input_dict = {"r0": {"links": {"r1": {"ospf": {"mtuBytes": 1200}}}}}
@ -964,9 +958,7 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
@ -983,9 +975,7 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216)." "Reset ospf neighbors on R0."
)
step("Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216). Reset ospf neighbors on R0.")
rtr0.run("ip link set {} mtu 9216".format(r0_r1_intf))
rtr1.run("ip link set {} mtu 9216".format(r1_r0_intf))

18
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper1.py
View File

@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Verify that GR helper route is disabled by default to the in" "the DUT.")
step("Verify that GR helper route is disabled by default to the in the DUT.")
input_dict = {
"helperSupport": "Disabled",
"strictLsaCheck": "Enabled",
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that DUT does not enter helper mode upon receiving the " "grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does not enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
# send grace lsa
scapy_send_raw_packet(tgen, topo, "r1", intf1, pkt)
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role " " \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Perform GR in RR.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving" " the grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
input_dict = {"activeRestarterCnt": 1}
gracelsa_sent = False
repeat = 0
@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_gr_r0)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving" " the grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
input_dict = {"activeRestarterCnt": 1}
gracelsa_sent = False
repeat = 0
@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_gr_r0)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that GR helper router is disabled in the DUT for" " router id x.x.x.x")
step("Verify that GR helper router is disabled in the DUT for router id x.x.x.x")
input_dict = {"enabledRouterIds": [{"routerId": "1.1.1.1"}]}
dut = "r0"
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc2_p0(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}

14
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper2.py
View File

@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -201,10 +201,8 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc3_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -295,10 +293,8 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc4_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {

8
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper3.py
View File

@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc7_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}
@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc7_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role " " \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc8_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}

236
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_asbr_summary_topo1.py
View File

@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5"
@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -343,9 +343,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -396,9 +396,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -416,7 +414,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r1"
step("All 5 routes are advertised after deletion of configured summary.")
@ -427,7 +425,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("configure the summary again and delete static routes .")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -455,7 +453,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -474,7 +472,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -483,7 +481,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Add back static routes.")
input_dict_static_rtes = {
@ -501,7 +499,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_static_rtes, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -510,7 +508,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]}]}}
dut = "r1"
@ -521,7 +519,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show configure summaries.")
@ -538,7 +536,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure new static route which is matching configured summary.")
input_dict_static_rtes = {
@ -604,7 +602,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut one of the interface")
intf = topo["routers"]["r0"]["links"]["r3-link0"]["interface"]
@ -676,7 +674,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]}]}}
@ -687,7 +685,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -715,7 +713,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -724,7 +722,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -787,11 +785,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -817,7 +813,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -833,7 +829,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Change the summary address mask to lower match (ex - 16 to 8)")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -868,7 +864,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that external routes(static / connected) are summarised"
@ -884,7 +880,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Change the summary address mask to higher match (ex - 8 to 24)")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -912,7 +908,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that external routes(static / connected) are summarised"
@ -933,7 +929,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(" Un configure one of the summary address.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -968,7 +964,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -995,7 +991,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1043,11 +1039,9 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -1079,7 +1073,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1095,7 +1089,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1120,7 +1114,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1129,9 +1123,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1149,7 +1141,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Min tag value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1174,7 +1166,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1190,7 +1182,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Max Tag Value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1220,7 +1212,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1239,7 +1231,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("configure new static route with different tag.")
input_dict_static_rtes_11 = {
@ -1264,7 +1256,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1279,7 +1271,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1300,7 +1292,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary address")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1331,7 +1323,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that summary address is flushed from neighbor.")
@ -1339,7 +1331,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1348,7 +1340,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure summary first & then configure matching static route.")
@ -1480,11 +1472,9 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -1516,7 +1506,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1554,7 +1544,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1563,9 +1553,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1583,7 +1571,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Min tag value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1608,7 +1596,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1624,7 +1612,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Max Tag Value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1654,7 +1642,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1673,7 +1661,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("configure new static route with different tag.")
input_dict_static_rtes_11 = {
@ -1698,7 +1686,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1713,7 +1701,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1734,7 +1722,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary address")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1765,7 +1753,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that summary address is flushed from neighbor.")
@ -1773,7 +1761,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1782,7 +1770,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure summary first & then configure matching static route.")
@ -1866,7 +1854,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5"
@ -1900,7 +1888,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1909,9 +1897,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the " "configured summaries.")
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the configured summaries.")
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
"Summary address": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0],
@ -1922,7 +1910,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1949,7 +1937,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1958,9 +1946,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1978,7 +1964,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Reconfigure summary with no advertise.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -2009,7 +1995,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2018,9 +2004,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the " "configured summaries.")
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the configured summaries.")
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
"Summary address": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0],
@ -2031,7 +2017,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Change summary address from no advertise to advertise "
@ -2080,7 +2066,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2096,9 +2082,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
output = tgen.gears["r0"].vtysh_cmd(
"show ipv6 ospf6 database as-external json", isjson=True
)
@ -2114,7 +2100,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2123,7 +2109,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2170,11 +2156,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -2202,7 +2186,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2218,9 +2202,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2228,7 +2212,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2237,7 +2221,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure route map and & rule to permit configured summary address,"
@ -2300,7 +2284,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
@ -2315,7 +2299,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure metric type as 1 in route map.")
@ -2352,7 +2336,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Un configure metric type from route map.")
@ -2389,7 +2373,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Change rule from permit to deny in prefix list.")
pfx_list = {
@ -2420,7 +2404,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2429,7 +2413,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2569,7 +2553,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc51_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2616,11 +2600,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -2648,7 +2630,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2664,9 +2646,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2674,7 +2656,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2683,7 +2665,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -2704,7 +2686,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2720,9 +2702,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2730,7 +2712,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2739,7 +2721,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

80
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_authentication.py
View File

@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf6_covergence
)
@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc9_keychain_not_configured(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc9_keychain_not_configured(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc10_no_auth_trailer(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_ecmp.py
View File

@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 2 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_ecmp_lan.py
View File

@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r0"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

2
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_nssa.py
View File

@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "setup_module: Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(result)
assert result is True, "setup_module: Failed \n Error: {}".format(result)
logger.info("Running setup_module() done")

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_nssa2.py
View File

@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_nssa_tc26_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut="r2", expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down" "Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Now configure area 0 on interface of r1 connecting to r2.")
@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_nssa_tc26_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut="r2", expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down" "Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Now configure area 2 on interface of r1 connecting to r2.")
@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_learning_tc15_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area" " type on DUT).")
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area type on DUT).")
for rtr in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
input_dict = {

12
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_routemaps.py
View File

@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -225,9 +225,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_red_r1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix &" " deny 10.0.20.2/32"
)
step("Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix & deny 10.0.20.2/32")
# Create ip prefix list
pfx_list = {
@ -699,7 +697,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc25_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1091,7 +1089,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1160,7 +1158,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

6
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_rte_calc.py
View File

@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_redistribution_tc8_p1(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are reset and forms new adjacencies.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

50
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_single_area.py
View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -722,9 +722,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf6": {"timerIntervalsConfigHello": 10}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -776,7 +774,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1" "dead interval timer on r2")
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1 dead interval timer on r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
@ -812,7 +810,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
# reconfiguring deleted ospf process by resetting the configs.
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to " "default on r1 and r2")
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to default on r1 and r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
"links": {
@ -933,9 +931,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf6": {"timerIntervalsConfigDead": 40}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -980,18 +976,14 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0", ospf="ospf6")
clear_ospf(tgen, "r1", ospf="ospf6")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
"instead of Exstart. Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
)
step(
"Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip " "ospf interface."
)
step("Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip ospf interface.")
dut = "r0"
input_dict = {"r0": {"links": {"r1": {"ospf6": {"interfaceMtu": 1400}}}}}
@ -1048,9 +1040,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0", ospf="ospf6")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
@ -1067,9 +1057,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216)." "Reset ospf neighbors on R0."
)
step("Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216). Reset ospf neighbors on R0.")
rtr0.run("ifconfig {} mtu 9216".format(r0_r1_intf))
rtr1.run("ifconfig {} mtu 9216".format(r1_r0_intf))
@ -1247,7 +1235,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, rtr, ospf="ospf6")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo1)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1273,9 +1261,9 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase : Failed \n Error: {}".format(result)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert (
ospf_covergence is not True
), "OSPF NBRs are up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "OSPF NBRs are up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
topo1 = {}
topo1 = deepcopy(topo)
@ -1318,7 +1306,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
topo1["routers"]["r3"]["ospf6"]["router_id"] = "1.1.1.4"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo1)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1326,7 +1314,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)