mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-08-06 04:36:45 +00:00
lib: A small optimization for the hash iterate and walk functions
When we are iterating through the hash, keep count of how many we've called and if we have finished calling the hash->size iterator times, then short-circuit and stop looping over the entire array. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8872626bb4
commit
626e8d0a9b
12
lib/hash.c
12
lib/hash.c
@ -241,15 +241,21 @@ void hash_iterate(struct hash *hash, void (*func)(struct hash_backet *, void *),
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
struct hash_backet *hb;
|
||||
struct hash_backet *hbnext;
|
||||
uint32_t count = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < hash->size; i++)
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < hash->size; i++) {
|
||||
for (hb = hash->index[i]; hb; hb = hbnext) {
|
||||
/* get pointer to next hash backet here, in case (*func)
|
||||
* decides to delete hb by calling hash_release
|
||||
*/
|
||||
hbnext = hb->next;
|
||||
(*func)(hb, arg);
|
||||
count++;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (count == hash->count)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void hash_walk(struct hash *hash, int (*func)(struct hash_backet *, void *),
|
||||
@ -259,6 +265,7 @@ void hash_walk(struct hash *hash, int (*func)(struct hash_backet *, void *),
|
||||
struct hash_backet *hb;
|
||||
struct hash_backet *hbnext;
|
||||
int ret = HASHWALK_CONTINUE;
|
||||
uint32_t count = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < hash->size; i++) {
|
||||
for (hb = hash->index[i]; hb; hb = hbnext) {
|
||||
@ -269,7 +276,10 @@ void hash_walk(struct hash *hash, int (*func)(struct hash_backet *, void *),
|
||||
ret = (*func)(hb, arg);
|
||||
if (ret == HASHWALK_ABORT)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (count == hash->count)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2144,7 +2144,6 @@ DEFUN (vtysh_show_poll,
|
||||
"Thread Poll Information\n")
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
int idx = 0;
|
||||
int ret = CMD_SUCCESS;
|
||||
char line[100];
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user