proxmox-mirrors/mirror_frr
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr synced 2025-08-03 00:13:40 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #12645 from gpnaveen/ospf_error_msg_enhancements

Browse Source 
tests: [topojson] Update assert/error messages for ospf scripts
This commit is contained in:
Russ White 2023-03-29 11:05:30 -04:00 committed by GitHub
commit 5218d9f82f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
23 changed files with 568 additions and 644 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

520
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_asbr_summary_topo1.py
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

22
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_asbr_summary_type7_lsa.py
View File

@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -235,11 +235,9 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r0 = {
"r0": {
@ -259,9 +257,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
"route is sent to R1."
)
step(
"Configure summary & redistribute static/connected route with " "metric type 2"
)
step("Configure summary & redistribute static/connected route with metric type 2")
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv4"][3]}]}}
dut = "r1"
@ -272,7 +268,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -288,7 +284,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Learn type 7 lsa from neighbours")
@ -312,7 +308,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r0 = {
"r0": {
@ -340,7 +336,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that already originated summary is intact.")
input_dict = {
@ -356,7 +352,7 @@ def test_ospf_type5_summary_tc44_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed. Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r1"
aggr_timer = {"r1": {"ospf": {"aggr_timer": 6}}}

44
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_authentication.py
View File

@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
step("Verify that the neighbour is not FULL between R1 and R2.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
"show ip ospf neighbor cmd."
)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_simple_pass_tc28_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=6
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
"show ip ospf neighbor cmd."
)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_md5_tc29_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=10
)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ def test_ospf_authentication_different_auths_tc30_p1(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

32
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_chaos.py
View File

@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
dut = "r0"
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
dut = "r1"
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after restarting R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc32_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after restarting R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors after base config is done.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R0")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
step("Verify OSPF neighbors are up after bringing back ospfd in R1")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

20
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_ecmp.py
View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 2 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

12
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_ecmp_lan.py
View File

@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r0"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

12
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_lan.py
View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -196,9 +196,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, lan=True)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -234,9 +232,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, lan=True)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 150 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
step("Configure DR pririty 150 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -355,7 +351,7 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, lan=True, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

6
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_nssa.py
View File

@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -220,11 +220,11 @@ def test_ospf_learning_tc15_p0(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area" " type on DUT).")
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area type on DUT).")
for rtr in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
input_dict = {

40
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_routemaps.py
View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -201,9 +201,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
redistribute_ospf(tgen, topo, "r0", "static", delete=True)
step(
"Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix &" " deny 10.0.20.2/32"
)
step("Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix & deny 10.0.20.2/32")
# Create ip prefix list
pfx_list = {
@ -294,7 +292,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -303,7 +301,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -347,7 +345,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -356,7 +354,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -404,7 +402,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -464,7 +462,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, retry_timeout=4, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -479,7 +477,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -499,7 +497,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -508,7 +506,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -523,7 +521,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -532,7 +530,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -553,7 +551,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -562,7 +560,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -861,7 +859,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -930,7 +928,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1078,7 +1076,7 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc25_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

10
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_rte_calc.py
View File

@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc6_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc8_p1(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are reset and forms new adjacencies.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ def test_ospf_rfc2328_appendinxE_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are Full.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

44
tests/topotests/ospf_basic_functionality/test_ospf_single_area.py
View File

@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ def test_ospf_p2p_tc3_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether BGP is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ def test_ospf_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ def test_ospf_show_p1(request):
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
dut = "r1"
@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1" "dead interval timer on r2")
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1 dead interval timer on r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
@ -714,11 +714,11 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to " "default on r1 and r2")
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to default on r1 and r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
"links": {
@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -835,9 +835,7 @@ def test_ospf_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf": {"timerDeadSecs": 40}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -883,18 +881,14 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
"instead of Exstart. Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
)
step(
"Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip " "ospf interface."
)
step("Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip ospf interface.")
dut = "r0"
input_dict = {"r0": {"links": {"r1": {"ospf": {"mtuBytes": 1200}}}}}
@ -951,9 +945,7 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
@ -970,9 +962,7 @@ def test_ospf_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216)." "Reset ospf neighbors on R0."
)
step("Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216). Reset ospf neighbors on R0.")
rtr0.run("ip link set {} mtu 9216".format(r0_r1_intf))
rtr1.run("ip link set {} mtu 9216".format(r1_r0_intf))

18
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper1.py
View File

@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -182,9 +182,9 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Verify that GR helper route is disabled by default to the in" "the DUT.")
step("Verify that GR helper route is disabled by default to the in the DUT.")
input_dict = {
"helperSupport": "Disabled",
"strictLsaCheck": "Enabled",
@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that DUT does not enter helper mode upon receiving the " "grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does not enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
# send grace lsa
scapy_send_raw_packet(tgen, topo, "r1", intf1, pkt)
@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role " " \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Perform GR in RR.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving" " the grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
input_dict = {"activeRestarterCnt": 1}
gracelsa_sent = False
repeat = 0
@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_gr_r0)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving" " the grace lsa.")
step("Verify that DUT does enter helper mode upon receiving the grace lsa.")
input_dict = {"activeRestarterCnt": 1}
gracelsa_sent = False
repeat = 0
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc1_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_gr_r0)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Verify that GR helper router is disabled in the DUT for" " router id x.x.x.x")
step("Verify that GR helper router is disabled in the DUT for router id x.x.x.x")
input_dict = {"enabledRouterIds": [{"routerId": "1.1.1.1"}]}
dut = "r0"
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc2_p0(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}

14
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper2.py
View File

@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -188,10 +188,8 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc3_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -282,10 +280,8 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc4_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step(
"Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors " "on all the routers."
)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
step("Configure DR pririty 100 on R0 and clear ospf neighbors on all the routers.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {

8
tests/topotests/ospf_gr_helper/test_ospf_gr_helper3.py
View File

@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc7_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc7_p1(request):
result = verify_ospf_gr_helper(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role " " \n Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed. DUT entered helper role \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ def test_ospf_gr_helper_tc8_p1(request):
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert (
ospf_covergence is True
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
), "OSPF is not after reset config \n Error: {}".format(ospf_covergence)
ospf_gr_r0 = {
"r0": {"ospf": {"graceful-restart": {"helper enable": [], "opaque": True}}}
}

236
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_asbr_summary_topo1.py
View File

@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5"
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -330,9 +330,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -383,9 +383,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -403,7 +401,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r1"
step("All 5 routes are advertised after deletion of configured summary.")
@ -414,7 +412,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("configure the summary again and delete static routes .")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -442,7 +440,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
input_dict = {
"r0": {
@ -461,7 +459,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -470,7 +468,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Add back static routes.")
input_dict_static_rtes = {
@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_static_rtes, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -497,7 +495,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]}]}}
dut = "r1"
@ -508,7 +506,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show configure summaries.")
@ -525,7 +523,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure new static route which is matching configured summary.")
input_dict_static_rtes = {
@ -591,7 +589,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut one of the interface")
intf = topo["routers"]["r0"]["links"]["r3-link0"]["interface"]
@ -663,7 +661,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
input_dict_summary = {"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]}]}}
@ -674,7 +672,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -702,7 +700,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -711,7 +709,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc42_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -774,11 +772,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -804,7 +800,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -820,7 +816,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Change the summary address mask to lower match (ex - 16 to 8)")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -855,7 +851,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that external routes(static / connected) are summarised"
@ -871,7 +867,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Change the summary address mask to higher match (ex - 8 to 24)")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -899,7 +895,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that external routes(static / connected) are summarised"
@ -920,7 +916,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(" Un configure one of the summary address.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -955,7 +951,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -982,7 +978,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc43_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1030,11 +1026,9 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -1066,7 +1060,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1082,7 +1076,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1107,7 +1101,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1116,9 +1110,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1136,7 +1128,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Min tag value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1161,7 +1153,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1177,7 +1169,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Max Tag Value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1207,7 +1199,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1226,7 +1218,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("configure new static route with different tag.")
input_dict_static_rtes_11 = {
@ -1251,7 +1243,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1266,7 +1258,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1287,7 +1279,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary address")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1318,7 +1310,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that summary address is flushed from neighbor.")
@ -1326,7 +1318,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1335,7 +1327,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure summary first & then configure matching static route.")
@ -1467,11 +1459,9 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
"ospf6": {
@ -1503,7 +1493,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1541,7 +1531,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1550,9 +1540,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1570,7 +1558,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Min tag value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1595,7 +1583,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries with tag.")
input_dict = {
@ -1611,7 +1599,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure Max Tag Value")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1641,7 +1629,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1660,7 +1648,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("configure new static route with different tag.")
input_dict_static_rtes_11 = {
@ -1685,7 +1673,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1700,7 +1688,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Verify that boundary values tags are used for summary route"
@ -1721,7 +1709,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary address")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1752,7 +1740,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that summary address is flushed from neighbor.")
@ -1760,7 +1748,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1769,7 +1757,7 @@ def ospfv3_type5_summary_tc45_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure summary first & then configure matching static route.")
@ -1853,7 +1841,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5"
@ -1887,7 +1875,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1896,9 +1884,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the " "configured summaries.")
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the configured summaries.")
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
"summaryAddress": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0],
@ -1909,7 +1897,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Delete the configured summary")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1936,7 +1924,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1945,9 +1933,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary Route still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("show ip ospf summary should not have any summary address.")
input_dict = {
@ -1965,7 +1951,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary still present in DB".format(tc_name)
step("Reconfigure summary with no advertise.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
@ -1996,7 +1982,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2005,9 +1991,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the " "configured summaries.")
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the configured summaries.")
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
"summaryAddress": SUMMARY["ipv6"][0],
@ -2018,7 +2004,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Change summary address from no advertise to advertise "
@ -2067,7 +2053,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2083,9 +2069,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
output = tgen.gears["r0"].vtysh_cmd(
"show ipv6 ospf6 database as-external json", isjson=True
)
@ -2101,7 +2087,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2110,7 +2096,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc46_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2157,11 +2143,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -2189,7 +2173,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2205,9 +2189,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2215,7 +2199,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2224,7 +2208,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure route map and & rule to permit configured summary address,"
@ -2287,7 +2271,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
input_dict = {
SUMMARY["ipv6"][0]: {
@ -2302,7 +2286,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure metric type as 1 in route map.")
@ -2339,7 +2323,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Un configure metric type from route map.")
@ -2376,7 +2360,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Change rule from permit to deny in prefix list.")
pfx_list = {
@ -2407,7 +2391,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict_summary, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2416,7 +2400,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc48_p0(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2556,7 +2540,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc51_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -2603,11 +2587,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_static_rtes, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5" " routes to one route."
)
step("Configure External Route summary in R0 to summarise 5 routes to one route.")
ospf_summ_r1 = {
"r0": {
@ -2635,7 +2617,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2651,9 +2633,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2661,7 +2643,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2670,7 +2652,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -2691,7 +2673,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv6", dut, input_dict_summary, protocol=protocol)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that show ip ospf summary should show the summaries.")
input_dict = {
@ -2707,9 +2689,9 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf_summary(tgen, topo, dut, input_dict, ospf="ospf6")
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Summary missing in OSPF DB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there" " peer.")
step("Verify that originally advertised routes are withdraw from there peer.")
input_dict = {
"r0": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK["ipv6"], "next_hop": "blackhole"}]}
}
@ -2717,7 +2699,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
result = verify_ospf6_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: " "Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes still present in OSPF RIB {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -2726,7 +2708,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_type5_summary_tc49_p2(request):
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

80
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_authentication.py
View File

@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf6_covergence
)
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc1_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc2_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc3_keychain_md5(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=5
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
"show ip ospf6 neighbor cmd."
)
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc4_keychain_sha256(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc5_md5_keymissmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc6_sha256_mismatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc7_keychain_md5_missmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc8_keychain_sha256_missmatch(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc9_keychain_not_configured(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc9_keychain_not_configured(request):
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(
tgen, topo, dut=dut, expected=False, retry_timeout=3
)
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is not True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)
@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ def test_ospf6_auth_trailer_tc10_no_auth_trailer(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf6_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf6_covergence is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, ospf6_covergence
)

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_ecmp.py
View File

@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 2 neighborship sessions.")
dut = "r1"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_ecmp_lan.py
View File

@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF is up with 8 neighborship sessions.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r0"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
dut = "r2"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut, lan=True)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

2
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_nssa.py
View File

@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "setup_module: Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(result)
assert result is True, "setup_module: Failed \n Error: {}".format(result)
logger.info("Running setup_module() done")

8
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_nssa2.py
View File

@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_nssa_tc26_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut="r2", expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down" "Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Now configure area 0 on interface of r1 connecting to r2.")
@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_nssa_tc26_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut="r2", expected=False)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down" "Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Nbrs are not down Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Now configure area 2 on interface of r1 connecting to r2.")
@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_learning_tc15_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area" " type on DUT).")
step("Change area 1 as non nssa area (on the fly changing area type on DUT).")
for rtr in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
input_dict = {

12
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_routemaps.py
View File

@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -212,9 +212,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
result = create_router_ospf(tgen, topo, ospf_red_r1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix &" " deny 10.0.20.2/32"
)
step("Create prefix-list in R0 to permit 10.0.20.1/32 prefix & deny 10.0.20.2/32")
# Create ip prefix list
pfx_list = {
@ -686,7 +684,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc25_p0(request):
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1078,7 +1076,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
@ -1147,7 +1145,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_routemaps_functionality_tc24_p0(request):
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, pfx_list)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not " "present. Error: {}".format(
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Prefix list not present. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)

6
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_rte_calc.py
View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbors are FULL.")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_redistribution_tc8_p1(request):
step("Verify that OSPF neighbours are reset and forms new adjacencies.")
# Api call verify whether OSPF is converged
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)

50
tests/topotests/ospfv3_basic_functionality/test_ospfv3_single_area.py
View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
step("verify that ospf neighbours are full")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut=dut)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "Testcase Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -709,9 +709,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_hello_tc10_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf6": {"timerIntervalsConfigHello": 10}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -763,7 +761,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1" "dead interval timer on r2")
step("modify dead interval from default value to r1 dead interval timer on r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
@ -799,7 +797,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
# reconfiguring deleted ospf process by resetting the configs.
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to " "default on r1 and r2")
step("reconfigure the default dead interval timer value to default on r1 and r2")
topo1 = {
"r0": {
"links": {
@ -920,9 +918,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_dead_tc11_p0(request):
result = create_interfaces_cfg(tgen, topo1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & " "set to default value 40 sec."
)
step("Verify that timer value is deleted from intf & set to default value 40 sec.")
input_dict = {"r1": {"links": {"r0": {"ospf6": {"timerIntervalsConfigDead": 40}}}}}
dut = "r1"
result = verify_ospf6_interface(tgen, topo, dut=dut, input_dict=input_dict)
@ -967,18 +963,14 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0", ospf="ospf6")
clear_ospf(tgen, "r1", ospf="ospf6")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
"instead of Exstart. Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
)
step(
"Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip " "ospf interface."
)
step("Verify that configured MTU value is updated in the show ip ospf interface.")
dut = "r0"
input_dict = {"r0": {"links": {"r1": {"ospf6": {"interfaceMtu": 1400}}}}}
@ -1035,9 +1027,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, "r0", ospf="ospf6")
step(
"Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart" " State."
)
step("Verify that OSPF neighborship between R0 and R1 is stuck in Exstart State.")
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n OSPF nbrs are Full "
@ -1054,9 +1044,7 @@ def test_ospfv3_tc4_mtu_ignore_p0(request):
result = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step(
"Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216)." "Reset ospf neighbors on R0."
)
step("Configure ospf interface with jumbo MTU (9216). Reset ospf neighbors on R0.")
rtr0.run("ifconfig {} mtu 9216".format(r0_r1_intf))
rtr1.run("ifconfig {} mtu 9216".format(r1_r0_intf))
@ -1234,7 +1222,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
clear_ospf(tgen, rtr, ospf="ospf6")
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo1)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1260,9 +1248,9 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase : Failed \n Error: {}".format(result)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert (
ospf_covergence is not True
), "OSPF NBRs are up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(ospf_covergence)
assert ospf_covergence is not True, "OSPF NBRs are up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
topo1 = {}
topo1 = deepcopy(topo)
@ -1305,7 +1293,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
topo1["routers"]["r3"]["ospf6"]["router_id"] = "1.1.1.4"
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo1)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)
@ -1313,7 +1301,7 @@ def ospfv3_router_id_tc14_p2(request):
reset_config_on_routers(tgen)
ospf_covergence = verify_ospf6_neighbor(tgen, topo)
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error:" " {}".format(
assert ospf_covergence is True, "OSPF NBRs not up.Failed \n Error: {}".format(
ospf_covergence
)