mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-08-04 13:02:59 +00:00
Merge pull request #13808 from anlancs/fix/zebra-kernel-route-reserved
zebra: fix wrong nexthop check for kernel routes
This commit is contained in:
commit
2ec7477a26
27
tests/topotests/zebra_rib/r1/v4_route_1_vrf_before.json
Normal file
27
tests/topotests/zebra_rib/r1/v4_route_1_vrf_before.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"3.5.1.0/24":[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prefix":"3.5.1.0/24",
|
||||
"prefixLen":24,
|
||||
"protocol":"kernel",
|
||||
"vrfId":0,
|
||||
"vrfName":"default",
|
||||
"selected":true,
|
||||
"destSelected":true,
|
||||
"distance":0,
|
||||
"metric":0,
|
||||
"installed":true,
|
||||
"table":254,
|
||||
"nexthops":[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"flags":3,
|
||||
"fib":true,
|
||||
"ip":"192.168.210.1",
|
||||
"afi":"ipv4",
|
||||
"interfaceName":"r1-eth0",
|
||||
"active":true
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
@ -77,6 +77,41 @@ def teardown_module(mod):
|
||||
tgen.stop_topology()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_zebra_kernel_route_vrf():
|
||||
"Test kernel routes should be removed after interface changes vrf"
|
||||
logger.info("Test kernel routes should be removed after interface changes vrf")
|
||||
vrf = "RED"
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
r1 = tgen.gears["r1"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Add kernel routes, the interface is initially in default vrf
|
||||
r1.run("ip route add 3.5.1.0/24 via 192.168.210.1 dev r1-eth0")
|
||||
json_file = "{}/r1/v4_route_1_vrf_before.json".format(CWD)
|
||||
expected = json.loads(open(json_file).read())
|
||||
test_func = partial(
|
||||
topotest.router_json_cmp, r1, "show ip route 3.5.1.0/24 json", expected
|
||||
)
|
||||
_, result = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, None, count=5, wait=1)
|
||||
assert result is None, '"r1" JSON output mismatches'
|
||||
|
||||
# Change the interface's vrf
|
||||
r1.run("ip link add {} type vrf table 1".format(vrf))
|
||||
r1.run("ip link set {} up".format(vrf))
|
||||
r1.run("ip link set dev r1-eth0 master {}".format(vrf))
|
||||
|
||||
expected = "{}"
|
||||
test_func = partial(
|
||||
topotest.router_output_cmp, r1, "show ip route 3.5.1.0/24 json", expected
|
||||
)
|
||||
result, diff = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, "", count=5, wait=1)
|
||||
assertmsg = "{} should not have the kernel route.\n{}".format('"r1"', diff)
|
||||
assert result, assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
# Clean up
|
||||
r1.run("ip link set dev r1-eth0 nomaster")
|
||||
r1.run("ip link del dev {}".format(vrf))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_zebra_kernel_admin_distance():
|
||||
"Test some basic kernel routes added that should be accepted"
|
||||
logger.info("Test some basic kernel routes that should be accepted")
|
||||
|
@ -2181,11 +2181,7 @@ static int nexthop_active(struct nexthop *nexthop, struct nhg_hash_entry *nhe,
|
||||
case NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFINDEX:
|
||||
|
||||
ifp = if_lookup_by_index(nexthop->ifindex, nexthop->vrf_id);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the interface exists and its operative or its a kernel
|
||||
* route and interface is up, its active. We trust kernel routes
|
||||
* to be good.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* If the interface exists and its operative, it's active */
|
||||
if (ifp && (if_is_operative(ifp)))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -2586,6 +2582,8 @@ static unsigned nexthop_active_check(struct route_node *rn,
|
||||
if (IS_ZEBRA_DEBUG_NHG_DETAIL)
|
||||
zlog_debug("%s: re %p, nexthop %pNHv", __func__, re, nexthop);
|
||||
|
||||
vrf_id = zvrf_id(rib_dest_vrf(rib_dest_from_rnode(rn)));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this is a kernel route, then if the interface is *up* then
|
||||
* by golly gee whiz it's a good route.
|
||||
@ -2595,13 +2593,12 @@ static unsigned nexthop_active_check(struct route_node *rn,
|
||||
|
||||
ifp = if_lookup_by_index(nexthop->ifindex, nexthop->vrf_id);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ifp && (if_is_operative(ifp) || if_is_up(ifp))) {
|
||||
if (ifp && ifp->vrf->vrf_id == vrf_id && if_is_up(ifp)) {
|
||||
SET_FLAG(nexthop->flags, NEXTHOP_FLAG_ACTIVE);
|
||||
goto skip_check;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vrf_id = zvrf_id(rib_dest_vrf(rib_dest_from_rnode(rn)));
|
||||
switch (nexthop->type) {
|
||||
case NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFINDEX:
|
||||
if (nexthop_active(nexthop, nhe, &rn->p, re->type, re->flags,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user