mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-04-28 13:20:12 +00:00
Merge pull request #12816 from gpnaveen/stc_rte_err_msg
tests: Enhance error msgs for static route automation.
This commit is contained in:
commit
2e1ea89222
@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed" "Error: Routes is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed Expected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N2 from" "running config")
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N2 from running config")
|
||||
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Expected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -422,20 +422,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -490,20 +490,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -522,20 +522,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -555,13 +555,13 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -674,7 +674,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
|
||||
step("Explicit route is added in R3 for R2 nexthop rechability")
|
||||
@ -715,7 +717,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 from" "running config")
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 from running config")
|
||||
rt1_nh1 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
"static_routes": [
|
||||
@ -765,7 +767,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -784,7 +788,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
|
||||
rte1_nh1 = {
|
||||
@ -804,7 +808,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N2 from" "running config")
|
||||
step("Remove the static route configured with nexthop N2 from running config")
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
"static_routes": [
|
||||
@ -839,7 +843,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -849,7 +853,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
@ -889,7 +893,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -899,7 +903,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
|
||||
@ -915,7 +919,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -939,7 +943,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not present in RIB \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -949,7 +953,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
|
||||
@ -977,7 +981,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -1005,7 +1009,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not active in RIB \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
@ -1022,7 +1028,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not be active in RIB \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
@ -1054,14 +1062,14 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -1089,14 +1097,16 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not be active in RIB \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen,
|
||||
@ -1110,7 +1120,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nExpected: Routes should not be active in RIB \nError: Routes are not active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1182,7 +1194,7 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1191,7 +1203,7 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1246,9 +1258,7 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in BGP RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in BGP RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -1256,9 +1266,9 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the static route on R3 configured with active" "interface")
|
||||
step("Remove the static route on R3 configured with active interface")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r3": {
|
||||
@ -1293,9 +1303,7 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in BGP RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in BGP RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -1303,7 +1311,7 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -382,9 +382,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
# Shutdown interface
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
step(
|
||||
" interface which is about to be shut no shut between r1 and r2 is " "%s",
|
||||
" interface which is about to be shut no shut between r1 and r2 is %s",
|
||||
topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link{}".format(randnum)]["interface"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link{}".format(randnum)]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -430,7 +428,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
@ -469,7 +467,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
@ -523,7 +521,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -558,7 +556,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -642,7 +640,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
@ -660,7 +658,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -705,9 +703,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -755,7 +751,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
|
||||
@ -772,7 +768,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -801,7 +797,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -815,7 +811,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
@ -824,7 +820,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {}: Failed \n " "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {}: Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
@ -833,7 +829,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {}: Failed \n " "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {}: Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
|
||||
@ -846,7 +842,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -945,7 +941,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
@ -962,7 +958,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -1007,9 +1003,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1057,7 +1051,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
|
||||
@ -1073,7 +1067,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -1102,7 +1096,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1116,7 +1110,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
@ -1132,7 +1126,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1231,7 +1225,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
@ -1250,7 +1244,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1314,7 +1308,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1345,15 +1339,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
" value and all the nexthop populated in RIB and FIB again"
|
||||
)
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
"static_routes": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"network": PREFIX1[addr_type],
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {"r2": {"static_routes": [{"network": PREFIX1[addr_type]}]}}
|
||||
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
|
||||
@ -1390,7 +1376,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1404,7 +1390,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1494,9 +1480,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route " " is missing in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1592,7 +1576,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
@ -1610,7 +1594,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1664,7 +1648,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1735,7 +1719,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still active in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_2 = {
|
||||
@ -317,11 +317,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
# add static routes
|
||||
@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
|
||||
@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -592,11 +592,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
# add static routes
|
||||
for nhp in range(1, 9):
|
||||
@ -685,7 +683,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -699,7 +697,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
|
||||
@ -812,7 +810,7 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB of R2".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB of R2".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -820,13 +818,13 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ebgp(request):
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are"
|
||||
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are"
|
||||
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -890,7 +888,7 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
input_dict_nh = {
|
||||
"r1": {
|
||||
@ -904,7 +902,7 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ip_nht(tgen, input_dict_nh)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Nexthop is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Nexthop is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Shut / no shut IPv4 and IPv6 static next hop interface from"
|
||||
@ -928,7 +926,7 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -974,9 +972,7 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1002,7 +998,7 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
|
||||
"Configure 2 IPv4 static route (S1 and S2) in R2 with same"
|
||||
"next hop N1 28.1.1.2"
|
||||
)
|
||||
step("Configure static route S1 with tag 1 and static route S2 with" "tag2")
|
||||
step("Configure static route S1 with tag 1 and static route S2 with tag2")
|
||||
step("S1= ip route 10.1.1.1/24 28.1.1.2 tag 1")
|
||||
step("S2= ip route 20.1.1.1/24 28.1.1.2 tag 2")
|
||||
step("Enable redistribute static in BGP with route-map")
|
||||
@ -1041,7 +1037,7 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure route-map on R2 with allow tag1 and deny tag2")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1229,7 +1225,7 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("shut/no shut of tag1 and tag2 nexthop")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -204,12 +204,12 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
clear_bgp(tgen, addr_type, "r2")
|
||||
|
||||
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both" " the sides")
|
||||
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both the sides")
|
||||
|
||||
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
bgp_convergence is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : " "Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, bgp_convergence
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("All BGP nbrs are up as authentication is matched now")
|
||||
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo)
|
||||
assert bgp_convergence is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert bgp_convergence is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, bgp_convergence
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
"show ip prefix list"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
|
||||
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" " Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Apply prefix list P1 on BGP neighbors 1 2 3 4 connected from " "frr r1")
|
||||
step("Apply prefix list P1 on BGP neighbors 1 2 3 4 connected from frr r1")
|
||||
# Configure prefix list to bgp neighbor
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result4 is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result4
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -421,20 +421,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -489,20 +489,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -521,20 +521,20 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -554,13 +554,13 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
|
||||
step("Explicit route is added in R3 for R2 nexthop rechability")
|
||||
@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
|
||||
rte1_nh1 = {
|
||||
@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
|
||||
@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
|
||||
@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
@ -1053,14 +1053,14 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
rte2_nh2 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -1088,14 +1088,14 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen,
|
||||
@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -384,9 +384,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
@ -432,7 +430,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
@ -471,7 +469,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
@ -525,7 +523,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -560,7 +558,7 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -644,7 +642,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
@ -662,7 +660,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -707,9 +705,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -757,7 +753,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
|
||||
@ -774,7 +770,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -803,7 +799,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -817,7 +813,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
# this is next hop reachability route in r3 as we are using ibgp
|
||||
@ -844,7 +840,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
@ -1051,7 +1047,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
@ -1068,7 +1064,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
|
||||
@ -1113,9 +1109,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1163,7 +1157,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
for nhp in range(2, 9):
|
||||
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
|
||||
@ -1179,7 +1173,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -1208,7 +1202,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1222,7 +1216,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
@ -1251,7 +1245,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "static"
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
@ -1458,7 +1452,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
@ -1477,7 +1471,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1541,7 +1535,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1572,15 +1566,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
" value and all the nexthop populated in RIB and FIB again"
|
||||
)
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
"static_routes": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"network": PREFIX1[addr_type],
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {"r2": {"static_routes": [{"network": PREFIX1[addr_type]}]}}
|
||||
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
|
||||
@ -1617,7 +1603,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1631,7 +1617,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1767,7 +1753,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1865,7 +1851,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
|
||||
nh = []
|
||||
@ -1883,7 +1869,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1937,7 +1923,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2008,7 +1994,7 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still active in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still active in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
input_dict_2 = {
|
||||
@ -316,11 +316,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
# add static routes
|
||||
@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
|
||||
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
|
||||
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
|
||||
@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -591,11 +591,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
|
||||
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
# add static routes
|
||||
for nhp in range(1, 9):
|
||||
@ -684,7 +682,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -698,7 +696,7 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reload the FRR router")
|
||||
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
|
||||
@ -852,7 +850,7 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ibgp(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB of R2".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are missing in RIB of R2".format(
|
||||
tc_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -860,13 +858,13 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ibgp(request):
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are"
|
||||
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: routes are"
|
||||
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -200,12 +200,12 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
clear_bgp(tgen, addr_type, "r2")
|
||||
|
||||
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both" " the sides")
|
||||
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both the sides")
|
||||
|
||||
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
bgp_convergence is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : " "Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, bgp_convergence
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("All BGP nbrs are up as authentication is matched now")
|
||||
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo)
|
||||
assert bgp_convergence is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert bgp_convergence is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, bgp_convergence
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
"show ip prefix list"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
|
||||
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" " Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Apply prefix list P1 on BGP neighbors 1 2 3 4 connected from " "frr r1")
|
||||
step("Apply prefix list P1 on BGP neighbors 1 2 3 4 connected from frr r1")
|
||||
# Configure prefix list to bgp neighbor
|
||||
input_dict_4 = {
|
||||
"r2": {
|
||||
@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result4 is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result4
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user