mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-08-02 20:27:14 +00:00
tests: More black fixups
Just another round of fixups found by running black on the code Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
98ca91e181
commit
0b25370e95
@ -346,9 +346,9 @@ def test_converge_protocols():
|
||||
|
||||
print("Show that v4 routes are right\n")
|
||||
v4_routesFile = "%s/r%s/ipv4_routes.ref" % (thisDir, i)
|
||||
expected = net["r%s" % i].cmd(
|
||||
"sort {} 2> /dev/null".format(v4_routesFile)
|
||||
).rstrip()
|
||||
expected = (
|
||||
net["r%s" % i].cmd("sort {} 2> /dev/null".format(v4_routesFile)).rstrip()
|
||||
)
|
||||
expected = ("\n".join(expected.splitlines()) + "\n").splitlines(1)
|
||||
|
||||
actual = (
|
||||
@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ def test_converge_protocols():
|
||||
|
||||
print("Show that v6 routes are right\n")
|
||||
v6_routesFile = "%s/r%s/ipv6_routes.ref" % (thisDir, i)
|
||||
expected = net["r%s" % i].cmd(
|
||||
"sort {} 2> /dev/null".format(v6_routesFile)
|
||||
).rstrip()
|
||||
expected = (
|
||||
net["r%s" % i].cmd("sort {} 2> /dev/null".format(v6_routesFile)).rstrip()
|
||||
)
|
||||
expected = ("\n".join(expected.splitlines()) + "\n").splitlines(1)
|
||||
|
||||
actual = (
|
||||
|
@ -505,8 +505,10 @@ def test_r1_mplsvpn_VrfTable():
|
||||
associated_int = r1_snmp.get(
|
||||
"mplsL3VpnVrfAssociatedInterfaces.{}".format(snmp_str_to_oid("VRF-a"))
|
||||
)
|
||||
assertmsg = "mplsL3VpnVrfAssociatedInterfaces incorrect should be 3 value {}".format(
|
||||
associated_int
|
||||
assertmsg = (
|
||||
"mplsL3VpnVrfAssociatedInterfaces incorrect should be 3 value {}".format(
|
||||
associated_int
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert associated_int == "3", assertmsg
|
||||
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ from lib.common_config import (
|
||||
kill_mininet_routers_process,
|
||||
get_frr_ipv6_linklocal,
|
||||
create_route_maps,
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reading the data from JSON File for topology and configuration creation
|
||||
@ -1329,20 +1329,22 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_4_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 5] : R2 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
@ -1802,10 +1804,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_6_1_2_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_r_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r2", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r2: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("Restart BGPd on R2 ")
|
||||
kill_router_daemons(tgen, "r2", ["bgpd"])
|
||||
@ -1823,10 +1826,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_6_1_2_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_r_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r2", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r2: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2108,20 +2112,22 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_17_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 5] : R2 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
@ -2140,10 +2146,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_17_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_r_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r1", peer="r2", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes
|
||||
next_hop = next_hop_per_address_family(
|
||||
@ -2469,20 +2476,22 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_20_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 5] : R2 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
@ -2755,10 +2764,10 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_31_1_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 4] : R1 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
start_router_daemons(tgen, "r1", ["bgpd"])
|
||||
@ -3237,10 +3246,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_9_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
@ -3248,10 +3259,10 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_9_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 5] : R2 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
@ -3281,10 +3292,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_9_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_f_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r1", peer="r2", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3416,10 +3428,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_17_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
@ -3427,10 +3441,10 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_17_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Phase 5] : R2 is about to come up now ")
|
||||
@ -3452,10 +3466,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_17_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_r_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r1", peer="r2", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: R-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes
|
||||
next_hop = next_hop_per_address_family(
|
||||
@ -3675,10 +3690,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_43_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
protocol = "bgp"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
@ -3983,10 +4000,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_44_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -5011,10 +5030,10 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_48_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
peer = "r1"
|
||||
@ -5025,17 +5044,19 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_48_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Bring up BGP on R1 and remove Peer-level GR config from R1")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5394,17 +5415,19 @@ def BGP_GR_TC_52_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_topo, next_hop, protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Bring up BGP on R2 and remove Peer-level GR config from R1")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ from lib.common_config import (
|
||||
kill_mininet_routers_process,
|
||||
get_frr_ipv6_linklocal,
|
||||
create_route_maps,
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reading the data from JSON File for topology and configuration creation
|
||||
@ -557,10 +557,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_3_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r2", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r2: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info(
|
||||
"Waiting for selection deferral timer({} sec)..".format(GR_SELECT_DEFER_TIMER)
|
||||
@ -703,10 +704,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_11_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r1", peer="r3", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info(
|
||||
"Waiting for selection deferral timer({} sec).. ".format(
|
||||
@ -733,10 +735,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_11_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r3", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r3: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1470,35 +1473,39 @@ def test_BGP_GR_18_p1(request):
|
||||
dut = "r6"
|
||||
input_dict_1 = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r1"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r6: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r6: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r6: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r6: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r6: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
@ -1959,18 +1966,20 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_29_p1(request):
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
input_dict = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r1"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Step 4] : Start BGPd daemon on R1..")
|
||||
@ -2212,10 +2221,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_33_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_2, next_hop_4, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
if addr_type == "ipv6":
|
||||
@ -2227,10 +2238,12 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_33_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_2, next_hop_6, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Step 4] : Start BGPd daemon on R1 and R4..")
|
||||
@ -2411,27 +2424,30 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_34_2_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_f_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, "r3", "r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r3: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes after starting BGPd daemon
|
||||
input_dict_1 = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r1"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
@ -2568,10 +2584,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_34_1_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_f_bit(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict_2, "r3", "r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r3: F-bit is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("[Step 3] : Kill BGPd daemon on R1..")
|
||||
@ -2587,18 +2604,20 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_34_1_p1(request):
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes
|
||||
input_dict = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r1"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Start BGPd daemon on R1
|
||||
@ -2772,27 +2791,30 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_32_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict_3, dut="r5", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r5: EOR is set to TRUE\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r5: EOR is set to TRUE\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes after starting BGPd daemon
|
||||
input_dict_1 = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r5"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
@ -2898,10 +2920,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_37_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r3", peer="r1", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r3: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes after starting BGPd daemon
|
||||
@ -2964,10 +2987,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_37_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict_3, dut="r1", peer="r3", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3119,18 +3143,20 @@ def test_BGP_GR_chaos_30_p1(request):
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
input_dict = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r3"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
@ -3532,10 +3558,10 @@ def BGP_GR_TC_7_p1(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
input_dict_1 = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r3"]}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3709,10 +3735,11 @@ def test_BGP_GR_TC_23_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_eor(
|
||||
tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r1", peer="r2", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: EOR is set to True\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying BGP RIB routes received from router R1
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
@ -3833,18 +3860,20 @@ def test_BGP_GR_20_p1(request):
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
input_dict_1 = {key: topo["routers"][key] for key in ["r1"]}
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in BGP RIB\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying RIB routes before shutting down BGPd daemon
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: routes are still present in ZEBRA\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info(" Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Start BGPd daemon on R1
|
||||
|
@ -598,10 +598,12 @@ def test_large_community_lists_with_rmap_apply_and_remove(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_community(
|
||||
tgen, adt, dut, NETWORKS[adt], input_dict_4, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"largeCommunity is still present after deleting route-map \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -899,10 +901,10 @@ def test_large_community_lists_with_rmap_set_none(request):
|
||||
dut = "r6"
|
||||
for adt in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_community(tgen, adt, dut, NETWORKS[adt], expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Community-list is still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Community-list is still present \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2238,10 +2240,10 @@ def test_large_community_lists_with_rmap_match_regex(request):
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_community(
|
||||
tgen, adt, dut, NETWORKS[adt], input_dict_7, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"largeCommunity is still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"largeCommunity is still present \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -508,10 +508,10 @@ def test_ambiguous_overlapping_addresses_in_different_vrfs_p0(request):
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, tag=500, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are present with tag value 500 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are present with tag value 500 \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info("Expected Behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
@ -1147,10 +1147,12 @@ def test_prefixes_leaking_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, metric=123, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are present with metric value 123 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info("Expected Behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_2, metric=123)
|
||||
@ -1161,10 +1163,12 @@ def test_prefixes_leaking_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_2, metric=0, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are present with metric value 0 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info("Expected Behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
@ -2222,16 +2222,20 @@ def test_restart_bgpd_daemon_p1(request):
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present in VRF RED_A and RED_B \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_2, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present in VRF BLUE_A and BLUE_B \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Bring up BGPd daemon on R1.")
|
||||
start_router_daemons(tgen, "r1", ["bgpd"])
|
||||
|
@ -369,10 +369,11 @@ def test_recursive_routes_iBGP_peer_p1(request):
|
||||
protocol="bgp",
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reconfigure the same static route on R2 again")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
@ -490,10 +491,11 @@ def test_recursive_routes_iBGP_peer_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, "r2", input_dict_4, protocol="bgp", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -602,10 +604,11 @@ def test_next_hop_as_self_ip_p1(request):
|
||||
next_hop=topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r4"][addr_type].split("/")[0],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Shut interface on R2 that has IP from the subnet as BGP next-hop")
|
||||
intf_r2_r4 = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r4"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -680,10 +683,11 @@ def test_next_hop_as_self_ip_p1(request):
|
||||
next_hop=topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r4"][addr_type].split("/")[0],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1626,10 +1630,11 @@ def test_BGP_peering_bw_loopback_and_physical_p1(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that once eBGP multi-hop is removed, BGP session goes down")
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence_from_running_config(tgen, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Add ebgp-multihop command on R3 again")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1667,10 +1672,11 @@ def test_BGP_peering_bw_loopback_and_physical_p1(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify that BGP session goes down, when update-source is removed")
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence_from_running_config(tgen, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Add update-source command on R1 again")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1719,18 +1725,20 @@ def test_BGP_peering_bw_loopback_and_physical_p1(request):
|
||||
next_hop=topo["routers"]["r1"]["links"]["r3"][addr_type].split("/")[0],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
sleep(3)
|
||||
step("Verify that BGP session goes down, when static route is removed")
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence_from_running_config(tgen, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Add static route on R3 again")
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
@ -1772,10 +1780,11 @@ def test_BGP_peering_bw_loopback_and_physical_p1(request):
|
||||
sleep(3)
|
||||
step("Verify that BGP neighborship between R1 and R3 goes down")
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence_from_running_config(tgen, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
intf_r1_r3 = topo["routers"]["r1"]["links"]["r3"]["interface"]
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, "r1", intf_r1_r3, True)
|
||||
@ -2091,10 +2100,11 @@ def test_BGP_active_standby_preemption_and_ecmp_p1(request):
|
||||
],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reconfigure multipath-relax command on R4")
|
||||
result = create_router_bgp(tgen, topo, maxpath_relax)
|
||||
@ -2151,10 +2161,11 @@ def test_BGP_active_standby_preemption_and_ecmp_p1(request):
|
||||
],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Re-configure maximum-path 2 command on R4")
|
||||
input_dict_8 = {
|
||||
@ -2342,10 +2353,11 @@ def test_password_authentication_for_eBGP_and_iBGP_peers_p1(request):
|
||||
"configured but not peer routers"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("configure same password on R2 and R3")
|
||||
for routerN in ["r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
@ -2372,10 +2384,11 @@ def test_password_authentication_for_eBGP_and_iBGP_peers_p1(request):
|
||||
"strings are in CAPs on R2 and R3"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure same password on R2 and R3 without CAPs")
|
||||
for routerN in ["r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
@ -2399,10 +2412,11 @@ def test_password_authentication_for_eBGP_and_iBGP_peers_p1(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify if password is removed from R1, both sessions go down again")
|
||||
result = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "BGP is converged \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure alphanumeric password on R1 and peer routers R2,R3")
|
||||
for bgp_neighbor in ["r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
|
@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ def disable_route_map_to_prefer_global_next_hop(tgen, topo):
|
||||
#
|
||||
#####################################################
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dynamic_imported_routes_advertised_to_iBGP_peer_p0(request):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
TC5_FUNC_5:
|
||||
@ -762,9 +763,7 @@ def test_dynamic_imported_routes_advertised_to_iBGP_peer_p0(request):
|
||||
|
||||
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"On router R1 delete static routes in vrf ISR to LOOPBACK_1"
|
||||
)
|
||||
step("On router R1 delete static routes in vrf ISR to LOOPBACK_1")
|
||||
|
||||
input_routes_r1 = {
|
||||
"r1": {
|
||||
@ -772,7 +771,7 @@ def test_dynamic_imported_routes_advertised_to_iBGP_peer_p0(request):
|
||||
{
|
||||
"network": [NETWORK1_3[addr_type], NETWORK1_4[addr_type]],
|
||||
"next_hop": (intf_r2_r1[addr_type]).split("/")[0],
|
||||
"delete": True
|
||||
"delete": True,
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ from lib.topotest import json_cmp_result
|
||||
from lib.topotest import g_extra_config as topotest_extra_config
|
||||
from lib.topolog import logger
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def pytest_addoption(parser):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Add topology-only option to the topology tester. This option makes pytest
|
||||
@ -143,9 +144,7 @@ def pytest_configure(config):
|
||||
vtysh_on_error = config.getoption("--vtysh-on-error")
|
||||
topotest_extra_config["vtysh_on_error"] = vtysh_on_error
|
||||
|
||||
topotest_extra_config["pause_after"] = (
|
||||
pause_after or shell or vtysh
|
||||
)
|
||||
topotest_extra_config["pause_after"] = pause_after or shell or vtysh
|
||||
|
||||
topotest_extra_config["topology_only"] = config.getoption("--topology-only")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -177,9 +176,11 @@ def pytest_runtest_makereport(item, call):
|
||||
else:
|
||||
error = True
|
||||
# Handle assert failures
|
||||
parent._previousfailed = item # pylint: disable=W0212
|
||||
parent._previousfailed = item # pylint: disable=W0212
|
||||
logger.error(
|
||||
'assert failed at "{}/{}": {}'.format(modname, item.name, call.excinfo.value)
|
||||
'assert failed at "{}/{}": {}'.format(
|
||||
modname, item.name, call.excinfo.value
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# (topogen) Set topology error to avoid advancing in the test.
|
||||
@ -188,7 +189,6 @@ def pytest_runtest_makereport(item, call):
|
||||
# This will cause topogen to report error on `routers_have_failure`.
|
||||
tgen.set_error("{}/{}".format(modname, item.name))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if error and topotest_extra_config["shell_on_error"]:
|
||||
for router in tgen.routers():
|
||||
pause = True
|
||||
|
@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ class TemplateTopo(Topo):
|
||||
switch.add_link(tgen.gears["r3"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def setup_module(mod):
|
||||
"Sets up the pytest environment"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -148,20 +147,24 @@ def setup_module(mod):
|
||||
# Don't start the following in the CE nodes
|
||||
if router.name[0] == "r":
|
||||
router.load_config(
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_ISIS, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/isisd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_ISIS,
|
||||
os.path.join(CWD, "{}/isisd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-M snmp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
router.load_config(
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_LDP, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/ldpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_LDP,
|
||||
os.path.join(CWD, "{}/ldpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
router.load_config(
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_SNMP, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/snmpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_SNMP,
|
||||
os.path.join(CWD, "{}/snmpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-Le -Ivacm_conf,usmConf,iquery -V -DAgentX,trap",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# After loading the configurations, this function loads configured daemons.
|
||||
tgen.start_router()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def teardown_module(mod):
|
||||
"Teardown the pytest environment"
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
@ -169,6 +172,7 @@ def teardown_module(mod):
|
||||
# This function tears down the whole topology.
|
||||
tgen.stop_topology()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def router_compare_json_output(rname, command, reference):
|
||||
"Compare router JSON output"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -184,6 +188,7 @@ def router_compare_json_output(rname, command, reference):
|
||||
assertmsg = '"{}" JSON output mismatches the expected result'.format(rname)
|
||||
assert diff is None, assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def generate_oid(numoids, index1, index2):
|
||||
if numoids == 1:
|
||||
oid = "{}".format(index1)
|
||||
@ -200,7 +205,9 @@ def test_isis_convergence():
|
||||
router_compare_json_output(
|
||||
rname,
|
||||
"show yang operational-data /frr-interface:lib isisd",
|
||||
"show_yang_interface_isis_adjacencies.ref")
|
||||
"show_yang_interface_isis_adjacencies.ref",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_scalar_snmp():
|
||||
"Wait for protocol convergence"
|
||||
@ -213,26 +220,26 @@ def test_r1_scalar_snmp():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysVersion', "one(1)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysLevelType', "level1and2(3)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysID',"00 00 00 00 00 01")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxPathSplits',"32")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxLSPGenInt',"900 seconds")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysAdminState',"on(1)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxAge',"1200 seconds")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('isisSysProtSupported',"07 5 6 7")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysVersion", "one(1)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysLevelType", "level1and2(3)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysID", "00 00 00 00 00 01")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxPathSplits", "32")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxLSPGenInt", "900 seconds")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysAdminState", "on(1)")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxAge", "1200 seconds")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("isisSysProtSupported", "07 5 6 7")
|
||||
|
||||
r2 = tgen.net.get("r2")
|
||||
r2_snmp = SnmpTester(r2, "2.2.2.2", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysVersion', "one(1)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysLevelType', "level1and2(3)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysID',"00 00 00 00 00 02")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxPathSplits',"32")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxLSPGenInt',"900 seconds")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysAdminState',"on(1)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysMaxAge',"1200 seconds")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid('isisSysProtSupported',"07 5 6 7")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysVersion", "one(1)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysLevelType", "level1and2(3)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysID", "00 00 00 00 00 02")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxPathSplits", "32")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxLSPGenInt", "900 seconds")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysAdminState", "on(1)")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysMaxAge", "1200 seconds")
|
||||
assert r2_snmp.test_oid("isisSysProtSupported", "07 5 6 7")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
circtable_test = {
|
||||
@ -245,7 +252,8 @@ circtable_test = {
|
||||
"isisCircMeshGroupEnabled": ["inactive(1)", "inactive(1)", "inactive(1)"],
|
||||
"isisCircSmallHellos": ["false(2)", "false(2)", "false(2)"],
|
||||
"isisCirc3WayEnabled": ["false(2)", "false(2)", "false(2)"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_isisCircTable():
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
@ -256,9 +264,9 @@ def test_r1_isisCircTable():
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
oids = []
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1,1,0))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1,2,0))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1,3,0))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1, 1, 0))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1, 2, 0))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(1, 3, 0))
|
||||
|
||||
# check items
|
||||
for item in circtable_test.keys():
|
||||
@ -267,14 +275,26 @@ def test_r1_isisCircTable():
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(item, circtable_test[item], oids), assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
circleveltable_test = {
|
||||
"isisCircLevelMetric": ["10", "10", "10", "10"],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelWideMetric": ["10", "10", "0", "0"],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelISPriority": ["64", "64", "64", "64"],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelHelloMultiplier": ["10", "10", "10", "10"],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelHelloTimer": ["3000 milliseconds", "3000 milliseconds", "3000 milliseconds", "3000 milliseconds"],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelMinLSPRetransInt": ["1 seconds", "1 seconds", "0 seconds", "0 seconds"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
"isisCircLevelHelloTimer": [
|
||||
"3000 milliseconds",
|
||||
"3000 milliseconds",
|
||||
"3000 milliseconds",
|
||||
"3000 milliseconds",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"isisCircLevelMinLSPRetransInt": [
|
||||
"1 seconds",
|
||||
"1 seconds",
|
||||
"0 seconds",
|
||||
"0 seconds",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_isislevelCircTable():
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
@ -285,10 +305,10 @@ def test_r1_isislevelCircTable():
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
oids = []
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,1,"area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,2,"area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,3,"area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,3,"domain"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 1, "area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 2, "area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 3, "area"))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 3, "domain"))
|
||||
|
||||
# check items
|
||||
for item in circleveltable_test.keys():
|
||||
@ -316,6 +336,7 @@ adjtable_down_test = {
|
||||
"isisISAdjNeighPriority": ["64"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_isisAdjTable():
|
||||
"check ISIS Adjacency Table"
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
@ -324,11 +345,11 @@ def test_r1_isisAdjTable():
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
oids = []
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,1,1))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2,2,1))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 1, 1))
|
||||
oids.append(generate_oid(2, 2, 1))
|
||||
|
||||
oids_down = []
|
||||
oids_down.append(generate_oid(2,1,1))
|
||||
oids_down.append(generate_oid(2, 1, 1))
|
||||
|
||||
# check items
|
||||
for item in adjtable_test.keys():
|
||||
@ -337,7 +358,6 @@ def test_r1_isisAdjTable():
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(item, adjtable_test[item], oids), assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# shutdown interface and one adjacency should be removed
|
||||
"check ISIS adjacency is removed when interface is shutdown"
|
||||
r1_cmd.vtysh_cmd("conf t\ninterface r1-eth1\nshutdown")
|
||||
@ -347,7 +367,9 @@ def test_r1_isisAdjTable():
|
||||
assertmsg = "{} should be {} oids {} full dict {}:".format(
|
||||
item, adjtable_down_test[item], oids_down, r1_snmp.walk(item)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(item, adjtable_down_test[item], oids_down), assertmsg
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
item, adjtable_down_test[item], oids_down
|
||||
), assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
# no shutdown interface and adjacency should be restored
|
||||
r1_cmd.vtysh_cmd("conf t\ninterface r1-eth1\nno shutdown")
|
||||
|
@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ from lib.topogen import Topogen, TopoRouter, get_topogen
|
||||
from lib.topolog import logger
|
||||
from lib.topotest import iproute2_is_vrf_capable
|
||||
from lib.common_config import (
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version,
|
||||
adjust_router_l3mdev,
|
||||
required_linux_kernel_version,
|
||||
adjust_router_l3mdev,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
from mininet.topo import Topo
|
||||
@ -51,18 +51,19 @@ from mininet.topo import Topo
|
||||
pytestmark = [pytest.mark.isisd]
|
||||
|
||||
VERTEX_TYPE_LIST = [
|
||||
"pseudo_IS",
|
||||
"pseudo_TE-IS",
|
||||
"IS",
|
||||
"TE-IS",
|
||||
"ES",
|
||||
"IP internal",
|
||||
"IP external",
|
||||
"IP TE",
|
||||
"IP6 internal",
|
||||
"IP6 external",
|
||||
"UNKNOWN"
|
||||
]
|
||||
"pseudo_IS",
|
||||
"pseudo_TE-IS",
|
||||
"IS",
|
||||
"TE-IS",
|
||||
"ES",
|
||||
"IP internal",
|
||||
"IP external",
|
||||
"IP TE",
|
||||
"IP6 internal",
|
||||
"IP6 external",
|
||||
"UNKNOWN",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ISISTopo1(Topo):
|
||||
"Simple two layer ISIS vrf topology"
|
||||
@ -330,8 +331,9 @@ def parse_topology(lines, level):
|
||||
ipv = "ipv4"
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
item_match = re.match(r"([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+)"
|
||||
, line)
|
||||
item_match = re.match(
|
||||
r"([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+)", line
|
||||
)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
item_match is not None
|
||||
and item_match.group(1) == "Vertex"
|
||||
@ -344,8 +346,12 @@ def parse_topology(lines, level):
|
||||
# Skip header
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
item_match = re.match(r"([^\s]+) ({}) ([0]|([1-9][0-9]*)) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+)"
|
||||
.format(vertex_type_regex), line)
|
||||
item_match = re.match(
|
||||
r"([^\s]+) ({}) ([0]|([1-9][0-9]*)) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+) ([^\s]+)".format(
|
||||
vertex_type_regex
|
||||
),
|
||||
line,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if item_match is not None:
|
||||
areas[area][level][ipv].append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -359,8 +365,10 @@ def parse_topology(lines, level):
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
item_match = re.match(r"([^\s]+) ({}) ([0]|([1-9][0-9]*)) ([^\s]+)"
|
||||
.format(vertex_type_regex), line)
|
||||
item_match = re.match(
|
||||
r"([^\s]+) ({}) ([0]|([1-9][0-9]*)) ([^\s]+)".format(vertex_type_regex),
|
||||
line,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if item_match is not None:
|
||||
areas[area][level][ipv].append(
|
||||
|
@ -141,15 +141,16 @@ def setup_module(mod):
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_ISIS, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/isisd.conf".format(rname))
|
||||
)
|
||||
router.load_config(
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_LDP, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/ldpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-M snmp"
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_LDP,
|
||||
os.path.join(CWD, "{}/ldpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-M snmp",
|
||||
)
|
||||
router.load_config(
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_SNMP, os.path.join(CWD, "{}/snmpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-Le -Ivacm_conf,usmConf,iquery -V -DAgentX,trap"
|
||||
TopoRouter.RD_SNMP,
|
||||
os.path.join(CWD, "{}/snmpd.conf".format(rname)),
|
||||
"-Le -Ivacm_conf,usmConf,iquery -V -DAgentX,trap",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.start_router()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ def test_rib():
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip if previous fatal error condition is raised
|
||||
# TODO: disabling this check to avoid 'snmpd not running' errors
|
||||
#if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
@ -212,7 +213,7 @@ def test_ldp_adjacencies():
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip if previous fatal error condition is raised
|
||||
# TODO: disabling this check to avoid 'snmpd not running' errors
|
||||
#if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ def test_ldp_neighbors():
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
|
||||
# Skip if previous fatal error condition is raised
|
||||
#if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# if tgen.routers_have_failure():
|
||||
# pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
@ -242,8 +243,8 @@ def test_r1_ldp_lsr_objects():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('mplsLdpLsrId', "01 01 01 01")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid('mplsLdpLsrLoopDetectionCapable', 'none(1)')
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("mplsLdpLsrId", "01 01 01 01")
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid("mplsLdpLsrLoopDetectionCapable", "none(1)")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_entity_table():
|
||||
@ -253,52 +254,31 @@ def test_r1_ldp_entity_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityLdpId", ["1.1.1.1:0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityIndex", ["1"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityProtocolVersion", ["1"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityAdminStatus", ["enable(1)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityOperStatus", ["enabled(2)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityTcpPort", ["646"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityUdpDscPort", ["646"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityMaxPduLength", ["4096 octets"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityKeepAliveHoldTimer", ["180 seconds"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityHelloHoldTimer", ["0 seconds"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityInitSessionThreshold", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityLdpId', ['1.1.1.1:0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityIndex', ['1'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityProtocolVersion', ['1'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityAdminStatus', ['enable(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityOperStatus', ['enabled(2)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityTcpPort', ['646'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityUdpDscPort', ['646'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityMaxPduLength', ['4096 octets'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityKeepAliveHoldTimer', ['180 seconds'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityHelloHoldTimer', ['0 seconds'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityInitSessionThreshold', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityLabelDistMethod', ['downstreamUnsolicited(2)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityLabelRetentionMode', ['liberal(2)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityPathVectorLimit', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityHopCountLimit', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityTransportAddrKind', ['loopback(2)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityTargetPeer', ['true(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityTargetPeerAddrType', ['ipv4(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityTargetPeerAddr', ['01 01 01 01'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityLabelType', ['generic(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityDiscontinuityTime', ['(0) 0:00:00.00'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStorageType', ['nonVolatile(3)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityRowStatus', ['createAndGo(4)'])
|
||||
"mplsLdpEntityLabelDistMethod", ["downstreamUnsolicited(2)"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityLabelRetentionMode", ["liberal(2)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityPathVectorLimit", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityHopCountLimit", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityTransportAddrKind", ["loopback(2)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityTargetPeer", ["true(1)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityTargetPeerAddrType", ["ipv4(1)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityTargetPeerAddr", ["01 01 01 01"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityLabelType", ["generic(1)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityDiscontinuityTime", ["(0) 0:00:00.00"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStorageType", ["nonVolatile(3)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityRowStatus", ["createAndGo(4)"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_entity_stats_table():
|
||||
@ -308,32 +288,23 @@ def test_r1_ldp_entity_stats_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionAttempts", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionAttempts', ['0'])
|
||||
"mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedNoHelloErrors", ["0"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedAdErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedMaxPduErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedLRErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsBadLdpIdentifierErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsBadPduLengthErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsBadMessageLengthErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsBadTlvLengthErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsMalformedTlvValueErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsKeepAliveTimerExpErrors", ["0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedNoHelloErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedAdErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedMaxPduErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsSessionRejectedLRErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsBadLdpIdentifierErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsBadPduLengthErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsBadMessageLengthErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsBadTlvLengthErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsMalformedTlvValueErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsKeepAliveTimerExpErrors', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsShutdownReceivedNotifications', ['0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpEntityStatsShutdownSentNotifications', ['0'])
|
||||
"mplsLdpEntityStatsShutdownReceivedNotifications", ["0"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpEntityStatsShutdownSentNotifications", ["0"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_peer_table():
|
||||
@ -343,17 +314,16 @@ def test_r1_ldp_peer_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpPeerLdpId", ["2.2.2.2:0", "3.3.3.3:0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpPeerLdpId', ['2.2.2.2:0', '3.3.3.3:0'])
|
||||
"mplsLdpPeerLabelDistMethod",
|
||||
["downstreamUnsolicited(2)", "downstreamUnsolicited(2)"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpPeerPathVectorLimit", ["0", "0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpPeerTransportAddrType", ["ipv4(1)", "ipv4(1)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpPeerLabelDistMethod',
|
||||
['downstreamUnsolicited(2)', 'downstreamUnsolicited(2)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpPeerPathVectorLimit', ['0', '0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpPeerTransportAddrType', ['ipv4(1)', 'ipv4(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpPeerTransportAddr', ['02 02 02 02', '03 03 03 03'])
|
||||
"mplsLdpPeerTransportAddr", ["02 02 02 02", "03 03 03 03"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_session_table():
|
||||
@ -363,18 +333,20 @@ def test_r1_ldp_session_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionState',
|
||||
['operational(5)', 'operational(5)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionRole',
|
||||
['passive(3)', 'passive(3)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionProtocolVersion',
|
||||
['1', '1'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionKeepAliveTime',
|
||||
['180 seconds', '180 seconds'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionMaxPduLength',
|
||||
['4096 octets', '4096 octets'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpSessionDiscontinuityTime',
|
||||
['(0) 0:00:00.00', '(0) 0:00:00.00'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
"mplsLdpSessionState", ["operational(5)", "operational(5)"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpSessionRole", ["passive(3)", "passive(3)"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpSessionProtocolVersion", ["1", "1"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
"mplsLdpSessionKeepAliveTime", ["180 seconds", "180 seconds"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
"mplsLdpSessionMaxPduLength", ["4096 octets", "4096 octets"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
"mplsLdpSessionDiscontinuityTime", ["(0) 0:00:00.00", "(0) 0:00:00.00"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_session_stats_table():
|
||||
@ -384,10 +356,8 @@ def test_r1_ldp_session_stats_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpSessionStatsUnknownMesTypeErrors', ['0', '0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
'mplsLdpSessionStatsUnknownTlvErrors', ['0', '0'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpSessionStatsUnknownMesTypeErrors", ["0", "0"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpSessionStatsUnknownTlvErrors", ["0", "0"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_r1_ldp_hello_adjacency_table():
|
||||
@ -397,12 +367,11 @@ def test_r1_ldp_hello_adjacency_table():
|
||||
r1 = tgen.net.get("r1")
|
||||
r1_snmp = SnmpTester(r1, "1.1.1.1", "public", "2c")
|
||||
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyIndex',
|
||||
['1', '2', '1'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyHoldTime',
|
||||
['15', '45', '15'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk('mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType',
|
||||
['link(1)', 'targeted(2)', 'link(1)'])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyIndex", ["1", "2", "1"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk("mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyHoldTime", ["15", "45", "15"])
|
||||
assert r1_snmp.test_oid_walk(
|
||||
"mplsLdpHelloAdjacencyType", ["link(1)", "targeted(2)", "link(1)"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Memory leak test template
|
||||
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ from lib.common_config import (
|
||||
run_frr_cmd,
|
||||
FRRCFG_FILE,
|
||||
retry,
|
||||
get_ipv6_linklocal_address
|
||||
get_ipv6_linklocal_address,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
LOGDIR = "/tmp/topotests/"
|
||||
|
@ -75,54 +75,54 @@ config_section = "topogen"
|
||||
# Debug logs for daemons
|
||||
DEBUG_LOGS = {
|
||||
"pimd": [
|
||||
'debug msdp events',
|
||||
'debug msdp packets',
|
||||
'debug igmp events',
|
||||
'debug igmp trace',
|
||||
'debug mroute',
|
||||
'debug mroute detail',
|
||||
'debug pim events',
|
||||
'debug pim packets',
|
||||
'debug pim trace',
|
||||
'debug pim zebra',
|
||||
'debug pim bsm',
|
||||
'debug pim packets joins',
|
||||
'debug pim packets register',
|
||||
'debug pim nht'
|
||||
"debug msdp events",
|
||||
"debug msdp packets",
|
||||
"debug igmp events",
|
||||
"debug igmp trace",
|
||||
"debug mroute",
|
||||
"debug mroute detail",
|
||||
"debug pim events",
|
||||
"debug pim packets",
|
||||
"debug pim trace",
|
||||
"debug pim zebra",
|
||||
"debug pim bsm",
|
||||
"debug pim packets joins",
|
||||
"debug pim packets register",
|
||||
"debug pim nht",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"bgpd": [
|
||||
'debug bgp neighbor-events',
|
||||
'debug bgp updates',
|
||||
'debug bgp zebra',
|
||||
'debug bgp nht',
|
||||
'debug bgp neighbor-events',
|
||||
'debug bgp graceful-restart',
|
||||
'debug bgp update-groups',
|
||||
'debug bgp vpn leak-from-vrf',
|
||||
'debug bgp vpn leak-to-vrf',
|
||||
'debug bgp zebr',
|
||||
'debug bgp updates',
|
||||
'debug bgp nht',
|
||||
'debug bgp neighbor-events',
|
||||
'debug vrf'
|
||||
"debug bgp neighbor-events",
|
||||
"debug bgp updates",
|
||||
"debug bgp zebra",
|
||||
"debug bgp nht",
|
||||
"debug bgp neighbor-events",
|
||||
"debug bgp graceful-restart",
|
||||
"debug bgp update-groups",
|
||||
"debug bgp vpn leak-from-vrf",
|
||||
"debug bgp vpn leak-to-vrf",
|
||||
"debug bgp zebr",
|
||||
"debug bgp updates",
|
||||
"debug bgp nht",
|
||||
"debug bgp neighbor-events",
|
||||
"debug vrf",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"zebra": [
|
||||
'debug zebra events',
|
||||
'debug zebra rib',
|
||||
'debug zebra vxlan',
|
||||
'debug zebra nht'
|
||||
"debug zebra events",
|
||||
"debug zebra rib",
|
||||
"debug zebra vxlan",
|
||||
"debug zebra nht",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"ospf": [
|
||||
'debug ospf event',
|
||||
'debug ospf ism',
|
||||
'debug ospf lsa',
|
||||
'debug ospf nsm',
|
||||
'debug ospf nssa',
|
||||
'debug ospf packet all',
|
||||
'debug ospf sr',
|
||||
'debug ospf te',
|
||||
'debug ospf zebra',
|
||||
]
|
||||
"debug ospf event",
|
||||
"debug ospf ism",
|
||||
"debug ospf lsa",
|
||||
"debug ospf nsm",
|
||||
"debug ospf nssa",
|
||||
"debug ospf packet all",
|
||||
"debug ospf sr",
|
||||
"debug ospf te",
|
||||
"debug ospf zebra",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if config.has_option("topogen", "verbosity"):
|
||||
@ -1155,10 +1155,8 @@ def create_debug_log_config(tgen, input_dict, build=False):
|
||||
log_file = debug_dict.setdefault("log_file", None)
|
||||
|
||||
if log_file:
|
||||
_log_file = os.path.join(LOGDIR, tgen.modname,
|
||||
log_file)
|
||||
debug_config.append("log file {} \n".\
|
||||
format(_log_file))
|
||||
_log_file = os.path.join(LOGDIR, tgen.modname, log_file)
|
||||
debug_config.append("log file {} \n".format(_log_file))
|
||||
|
||||
if type(enable_logs) is list:
|
||||
for daemon in enable_logs:
|
||||
@ -1178,10 +1176,9 @@ def create_debug_log_config(tgen, input_dict, build=False):
|
||||
for debug_log in debug_logs:
|
||||
debug_config.append("no {}".format(debug_log))
|
||||
|
||||
result = create_common_configuration(tgen, router,
|
||||
debug_config,
|
||||
"debug_log_config",
|
||||
build=build)
|
||||
result = create_common_configuration(
|
||||
tgen, router, debug_config, "debug_log_config", build=build
|
||||
)
|
||||
except InvalidCLIError:
|
||||
# Traceback
|
||||
errormsg = traceback.format_exc()
|
||||
@ -3868,7 +3865,7 @@ def get_ipv6_linklocal_address(topo, node, intf):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
ext_nh = tgen.net[node].get_ipv6_linklocal()
|
||||
req_nh = topo[node]['links'][intf]['interface']
|
||||
req_nh = topo[node]["links"][intf]["interface"]
|
||||
llip = None
|
||||
for llips in ext_nh:
|
||||
if llips[0] == req_nh:
|
||||
@ -3876,8 +3873,9 @@ def get_ipv6_linklocal_address(topo, node, intf):
|
||||
logger.info("Link local ip found = %s", llip)
|
||||
return llip
|
||||
|
||||
errormsg = "Failed: Link local ip not found on router {}, "\
|
||||
"interface {}".format(node, intf)
|
||||
errormsg = "Failed: Link local ip not found on router {}, " "interface {}".format(
|
||||
node, intf
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return errormsg
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4553,9 +4551,7 @@ def adjust_router_l3mdev(tgen, router):
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
output = tgen.net[router].cmd("sysctl -n net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept")
|
||||
logger.info(
|
||||
"router {0}: existing tcp_l3mdev_accept was {1}".format(router, output)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info("router {0}: existing tcp_l3mdev_accept was {1}".format(router, output))
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net[router].cmd(
|
||||
"sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept={}".format(l3mdev_accept)
|
||||
|
@ -344,9 +344,7 @@ def config_ospf_interface(tgen, topo, input_dict=None, build=False, load_config=
|
||||
for lnk in input_dict[router]["links"].keys():
|
||||
if "ospf" not in input_dict[router]["links"][lnk]:
|
||||
logger.debug(
|
||||
"Router %s: ospf config is not present in"
|
||||
"input_dict",
|
||||
router
|
||||
"Router %s: ospf config is not present in" "input_dict", router
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
ospf_data = input_dict[router]["links"][lnk]["ospf"]
|
||||
|
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ from mininet.term import makeTerm
|
||||
|
||||
g_extra_config = {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def gdb_core(obj, daemon, corefiles):
|
||||
gdbcmds = """
|
||||
info threads
|
||||
@ -544,7 +545,7 @@ def iproute2_is_vrf_capable():
|
||||
["ip", "route", "show", "vrf"],
|
||||
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
|
||||
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
|
||||
stdin=subprocess.PIPE
|
||||
stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
iproute2_err = subp.communicate()[1].splitlines()[0].split()[0]
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1345,15 +1346,9 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
# Run a command in a new window (gnome-terminal, screen, tmux, xterm)
|
||||
def runInWindow(self, cmd, title=None):
|
||||
topo_terminal = os.getenv("FRR_TOPO_TERMINAL")
|
||||
if topo_terminal or (
|
||||
"TMUX" not in os.environ and "STY" not in os.environ
|
||||
):
|
||||
if topo_terminal or ("TMUX" not in os.environ and "STY" not in os.environ):
|
||||
term = topo_terminal if topo_terminal else "xterm"
|
||||
makeTerm(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
title=title if title else cmd,
|
||||
term=term,
|
||||
cmd=cmd)
|
||||
makeTerm(self, title=title if title else cmd, term=term, cmd=cmd)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
nscmd = "sudo nsenter -m -n -t {} {}".format(self.pid, cmd)
|
||||
if "TMUX" in os.environ:
|
||||
@ -1362,9 +1357,7 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
cmd = "{} {}".format(wcmd, nscmd)
|
||||
elif "STY" in os.environ:
|
||||
if os.path.exists(
|
||||
"/run/screen/S-{}/{}".format(
|
||||
os.environ['USER'], os.environ['STY']
|
||||
)
|
||||
"/run/screen/S-{}/{}".format(os.environ["USER"], os.environ["STY"])
|
||||
):
|
||||
wcmd = "screen"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
@ -1372,7 +1365,6 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
cmd = "{} {}".format(wcmd, nscmd)
|
||||
self.cmd(cmd)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def startRouter(self, tgen=None):
|
||||
# Disable integrated-vtysh-config
|
||||
self.cmd(
|
||||
@ -1459,7 +1451,7 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
def startRouterDaemons(self, daemons=None):
|
||||
"Starts all FRR daemons for this router."
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_breakpoints = g_extra_config["gdb_breakpoints"]
|
||||
gdb_breakpoints = g_extra_config["gdb_breakpoints"]
|
||||
gdb_daemons = g_extra_config["gdb_daemons"]
|
||||
gdb_routers = g_extra_config["gdb_routers"]
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1520,12 +1512,10 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
(gdb_routers or gdb_daemons)
|
||||
and (not gdb_routers
|
||||
or self.name in gdb_routers
|
||||
or "all" in gdb_routers)
|
||||
and (not gdb_daemons
|
||||
or daemon in gdb_daemons
|
||||
or "all" in gdb_daemons)
|
||||
and (
|
||||
not gdb_routers or self.name in gdb_routers or "all" in gdb_routers
|
||||
)
|
||||
and (not gdb_daemons or daemon in gdb_daemons or "all" in gdb_daemons)
|
||||
):
|
||||
if daemon == "snmpd":
|
||||
cmdopt += " -f "
|
||||
@ -1546,7 +1536,6 @@ class Router(Node):
|
||||
self.cmd(" ".join([cmdenv, binary, cmdopt]))
|
||||
logger.info("{}: {} {} started".format(self, self.routertype, daemon))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Start Zebra first
|
||||
if "zebra" in daemons_list:
|
||||
start_daemon("zebra", "-s 90000000")
|
||||
|
@ -648,7 +648,11 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
"i1": {"static_routes": [{"network": BSR1_ADDR, "next_hop": next_hop_rp}]},
|
||||
"l1": {"static_routes": [{"network": BSR1_ADDR, "next_hop": next_hop_lhr}]},
|
||||
"f1": {"static_routes": [{"network": CRP, "next_hop": next_hop_fhr, "delete": True}]},
|
||||
"f1": {
|
||||
"static_routes": [
|
||||
{"network": CRP, "next_hop": next_hop_fhr, "delete": True}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict)
|
||||
@ -692,10 +696,11 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify if b1 chosen as BSR in l1")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_bsr(tgen, topo, "l1", BSR_IP_1, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"b1 is not chosen as BSR in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "b1 is not chosen as BSR in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
@ -841,10 +846,12 @@ def test_new_router_fwd_p0(request):
|
||||
# Verify bsr state in l1
|
||||
step("Verify no BSR in l1 as i1 would not forward the no-forward bsm")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_bsr(tgen, topo, "l1", bsr_ip, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"BSR data is present after no-forward bsm also \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# unconfigure unicast bsm on f1-i1-eth2
|
||||
step("unconfigure unicast bsm on f1-i1-eth2, will forward with only mcast")
|
||||
@ -966,10 +973,11 @@ def test_int_bsm_config_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
tgen, "i1", src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oil, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# unconfigure bsm processing on f1 on f1-i1-eth2
|
||||
step("unconfigure bsm processing on f1 in f1-i1-eth2, will drop bsm")
|
||||
@ -989,20 +997,21 @@ def test_int_bsm_config_p1(request):
|
||||
# Verify bsr state in i1
|
||||
step("Verify if b1 is not chosen as BSR in i1")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_bsr(tgen, topo, "i1", bsr_ip, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"b1 is chosen as BSR in i1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "b1 is chosen as BSR in i1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# check if mroute still not installed because of rp not available
|
||||
step("check if mroute still not installed because of rp not available")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
tgen, "i1", src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oil, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroute installed but rp not available \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroute installed but rp not available \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# configure bsm processing on i1 on f1-i1-eth2
|
||||
step("configure bsm processing on f1 in f1-i1-eth2, will accept bsm")
|
||||
@ -1464,10 +1473,11 @@ def test_BSM_timeout_p0(request):
|
||||
tgen, topo, "f1", group, rp_source="BSR", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"bsr has not aged out in f1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "bsr has not aged out in f1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify RP mapping removed after hold timer expires
|
||||
group = "225.1.1.1/32"
|
||||
@ -1491,20 +1501,23 @@ def test_BSM_timeout_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"join state is up and join timer is running in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify ip mroute is not installed
|
||||
step("Verify mroute not installed in l1")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
tgen, dut, src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oil, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("clear BSM database before moving to next case")
|
||||
clear_bsrp_data(tgen, topo)
|
||||
@ -1657,10 +1670,11 @@ def test_iif_join_state_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
tgen, dut, src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oil, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Add back route for RP to make it reachable
|
||||
step("Add back route for RP to make it reachable")
|
||||
|
@ -458,10 +458,11 @@ def test_starg_mroute_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
tgen, dut, src_addr, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oil, wait=20, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "mroute installed in l1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Send BSM again to configure rp
|
||||
step("Add back RP by sending BSM from b1")
|
||||
@ -811,10 +812,11 @@ def test_BSR_election_p0(request):
|
||||
# Verify bsr state in FHR
|
||||
step("Verify if b2 is not chosen as bsr in f1")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_bsr(tgen, topo, "f1", bsr_ip2, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"b2 is chosen as bsr in f1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "b2 is chosen as bsr in f1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify if b1 is still chosen as bsr
|
||||
step("Verify if b1 is still chosen as bsr in f1")
|
||||
|
@ -3487,11 +3487,11 @@ def test_prune_sent_to_LHR_and_FHR_when_PIMnbr_down_p2(request):
|
||||
IGMP_JOIN_RANGE_1,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"upstream is still present after shut the link from "
|
||||
"FHR to RP from RP node \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"FHR to RP from RP node \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(" No shut the link from FHR to RP from RP node")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3638,11 +3638,11 @@ def test_prune_sent_to_LHR_and_FHR_when_PIMnbr_down_p2(request):
|
||||
IGMP_JOIN_RANGE_1,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"upstream is still present after shut the link from "
|
||||
"FHR to RP from FHR node \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"FHR to RP from FHR node \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(" No shut the link from FHR to RP from FHR node")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -490,10 +490,12 @@ def test_mroute_when_RP_reachable_default_route_p2(request):
|
||||
data["oil"],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroutes(S,G) are present after delete of static routes on c1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(
|
||||
tgen,
|
||||
@ -503,10 +505,12 @@ def test_mroute_when_RP_reachable_default_route_p2(request):
|
||||
IGMP_JOIN_RANGE_1,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"upstream is present after delete of static routes on c1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for data in input_dict_starg:
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(
|
||||
@ -518,10 +522,12 @@ def test_mroute_when_RP_reachable_default_route_p2(request):
|
||||
data["oil"],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroutes(*,G) are present after delete of static routes on c1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(
|
||||
tgen,
|
||||
@ -531,10 +537,12 @@ def test_mroute_when_RP_reachable_default_route_p2(request):
|
||||
IGMP_JOIN_RANGE_1,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"upstream is present after delete of static routes on c1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure default routes on c2")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -557,10 +565,12 @@ def test_mroute_when_RP_reachable_default_route_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
|
||||
tgen, topo, dut, GROUP_RANGE_1, "Unknown", rp_address, SOURCE, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"RP info is unknown after removing static route from c2 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify (s,g) populated after adding default route ")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -787,10 +797,11 @@ def test_mroute_with_RP_default_route_all_nodes_p2(request):
|
||||
data["oil"],
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(
|
||||
tgen,
|
||||
@ -800,10 +811,11 @@ def test_mroute_with_RP_default_route_all_nodes_p2(request):
|
||||
IGMP_JOIN_RANGE_1,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"upstream is still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "upstream is still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Configure default routes on all the nodes")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -840,10 +852,12 @@ def test_mroute_with_RP_default_route_all_nodes_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
|
||||
tgen, topo, dut, GROUP_RANGE_1, "Unknown", rp_address, SOURCE, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"RP info is unknown after removing static route from c2 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Verify (s,g) populated after adding default route ")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -423,10 +423,12 @@ def test_add_delete_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
interface = "r1-r0-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_igmp_groups(tgen, dut, interface, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: igmp group present without any IGMP join \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify show ip pim interface traffic without any IGMP join")
|
||||
state_dict = {"r1": {"r1-r2-eth1": ["pruneTx"]}}
|
||||
@ -492,26 +494,29 @@ def test_add_delete_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
|
||||
tgen, topo, dut, GROUP_RANGE_ALL, iif, rp_address, SOURCE, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: RP info present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: RP info present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify upstream IIF interface")
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF interface present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF interface present \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify upstream join state and join timer")
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream join state is up and join timer is running \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify PIM state")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_state(tgen, dut, iif, oif, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
@ -521,10 +526,11 @@ def test_add_delete_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify ip mroutes")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: mroutes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify show ip pim interface traffic without any IGMP join")
|
||||
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
|
||||
@ -681,10 +687,12 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_same_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S, G) upstream join state is up and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r2-eth1"
|
||||
@ -811,17 +819,19 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
"using show ip pim state"
|
||||
)
|
||||
result = verify_pim_state(tgen, dut, iif, oif, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"OIL is not same and IIF is not cleared on R1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: upstream IIF should be unknown , verify using show ip pim" "upstream")
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF is not unknown \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF is not unknown \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"r1: join state should not be joined and join timer should stop,"
|
||||
@ -830,10 +840,12 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: join state is joined and timer is not stopped \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"r1: (*,G) prune is sent towards the RP interface, verify using"
|
||||
@ -850,10 +862,12 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: (*, G) cleared from mroute table using show ip mroute")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: (*, G) are not cleared from mroute table \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
logger.info("Expected behavior: {}".format(result))
|
||||
|
||||
# Uncomment next line for debugging
|
||||
@ -920,10 +934,11 @@ def test_add_RP_after_join_received_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
|
||||
tgen, topo, dut, GROUP_RANGE_ALL, iif, rp_address, SOURCE, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: rp-info is present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: rp-info is present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("joinTx value before join sent")
|
||||
state_dict = {"r1": {"r1-r2-eth1": ["joinTx"]}}
|
||||
@ -944,34 +959,38 @@ def test_add_RP_after_join_received_p1(request):
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify upstream IIF interface")
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IFF interface is present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IFF interface is present \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify upstream join state and join timer")
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream join state is joined and timer is running \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify PIM state")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_state(tgen, dut, iif, oif, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: PIM state is up\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: PIM state is up\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Verify ip mroutes")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: mroutes are still present\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: mroutes are still present\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Configure static RP")
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
@ -1095,33 +1114,37 @@ def test_reachable_static_RP_after_join_p0(request):
|
||||
step("r1 : Verify upstream IIF interface")
|
||||
iif = "r1-r2-eth1"
|
||||
result = verify_upstream_iif(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF interface is present\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream IIF interface is present\n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1 : Verify upstream join state and join timer")
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: upstream join state is joined and timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1 : Verify PIM state")
|
||||
result = verify_pim_state(tgen, dut, iif, oif, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: PIM state is up\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: PIM state is up\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1 : Verify ip mroutes")
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: mroutes are still present\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: mroutes are still present\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r1: Make RP reachable")
|
||||
intf = "r1-r2-eth1"
|
||||
@ -1362,10 +1385,12 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
|
||||
tgen, topo, dut, GROUP_RANGE, oif, rp_address_2, SOURCE, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: rp-info is present for group 225.1.1.1 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"r1 : Verify RPF interface updated in mroute when higher preferred"
|
||||
@ -1619,11 +1644,11 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_LHR_1_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S, G) upstream join state is joined and join"
|
||||
" timer is running \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
" timer is running \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -1828,10 +1853,12 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_LHR_2_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2036,10 +2063,12 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_FHR_1_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2245,10 +2274,12 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_FHR_2_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2372,10 +2403,12 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_different_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2394,10 +2427,12 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_different_p1(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -2623,10 +2658,12 @@ def test_restart_pimd_process_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2791,10 +2828,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_same_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -2813,10 +2852,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_same_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -2932,10 +2973,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_same_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -2952,10 +2995,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_same_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -3132,10 +3177,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_1, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -3154,10 +3201,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_1, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -3224,10 +3273,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_2, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r4: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r4: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -3399,10 +3450,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_1, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -3421,10 +3474,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_1, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -3491,10 +3546,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_2, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r4: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r4: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "none"
|
||||
@ -3513,10 +3570,12 @@ def test_multiple_groups_different_RP_address_p2(request):
|
||||
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
|
||||
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS_LIST_2, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
@ -3643,30 +3702,36 @@ def test_shutdown_primary_path_p1(request):
|
||||
iif = "r1-r3-eth2"
|
||||
oif = "r1-r0-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R3 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (*, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
iif = "lo"
|
||||
oif = "r2-r3-eth1"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R3 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: Verify (*, G) ip mroutes")
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
iif = "r3-r2-eth1"
|
||||
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r3: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R3 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r3: No shutdown the link from R1 to R3 from R3 node")
|
||||
dut = "r3"
|
||||
@ -3826,20 +3891,24 @@ def test_delete_RP_shut_noshut_upstream_interface_p1(request):
|
||||
iif = "r1-r2-eth1"
|
||||
oif = "r1-r0-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R0 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (*, G) ip mroutes cleared")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
iif = "lo"
|
||||
oif = "r2-r1-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R0 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3949,20 +4018,24 @@ def test_delete_RP_shut_noshut_RP_interface_p1(request):
|
||||
iif = "r1-r2-eth1"
|
||||
oif = "r1-r0-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R2 and R3 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("r2: Verify (*, G) ip mroutes cleared")
|
||||
dut = "r2"
|
||||
iif = "lo"
|
||||
oif = "r2-r1-eth0"
|
||||
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r2: (*,G) mroutes are not cleared after shut of R1 to R2 and R3 link\n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ from mininet.topo import Topo
|
||||
|
||||
pytestmark = [pytest.mark.ospfd]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TemplateTopo(Topo):
|
||||
"Test topology builder"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -385,9 +386,7 @@ def test_rib_ipv4_step5():
|
||||
pytest.skip(tgen.errors)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.info("Disabling SR on rt6")
|
||||
tgen.net["rt6"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "no segment-routing on"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["rt6"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "no segment-routing on"')
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["rt1", "rt2", "rt3", "rt4", "rt5", "rt6"]:
|
||||
router_compare_json_output(
|
||||
@ -652,7 +651,7 @@ def test_mpls_lib_step10():
|
||||
# Expected changes:
|
||||
# -All commands should be rejected
|
||||
#
|
||||
#def test_ospf_invalid_config_step11():
|
||||
# def test_ospf_invalid_config_step11():
|
||||
# logger.info("Test (step 11): check if invalid configuration is rejected")
|
||||
# tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
pytestmark = [pytest.mark.ospfd]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class OspfTeTopo(Topo):
|
||||
"Test topology builder"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ def setup_testcase(msg):
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that all routers must discover the same Network Topology, so the same TED.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_step1():
|
||||
"Step1: Check initial topology"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -190,12 +192,8 @@ def test_step2():
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = setup_testcase("Step2: Shutdown interface between r1 & r2")
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r1-eth1" -c "shutdown"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r2-eth1" -c "shutdown"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r1-eth1" -c "shutdown"')
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r2-eth1" -c "shutdown"')
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3", "r4"]:
|
||||
compare_ted_json_output(tgen, rname, "ted_step2.json")
|
||||
@ -207,9 +205,7 @@ def test_step3():
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = setup_testcase("Step3: Disable Inter-AS on r3")
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net["r3"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "no mpls-te inter-as"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r3"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "no mpls-te inter-as"')
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3", "r4"]:
|
||||
compare_ted_json_output(tgen, rname, "ted_step3.json")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -221,18 +217,14 @@ def test_step4():
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = setup_testcase("Step4: Enable Segment Routing on r1 & r2")
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing on"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing on"')
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing global-block 20000 23999"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing prefix 10.0.255.1/32 index 10"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing on"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing on"')
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "router ospf" -c "segment-routing node-msd 16"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -253,12 +245,8 @@ def test_step5():
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = setup_testcase("Step5: Re-enable interface between r1 & r2")
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r1-eth1" -c "no shutdown"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r2-eth1" -c "no shutdown"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r1"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r1-eth1" -c "no shutdown"')
|
||||
tgen.net["r2"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "interface r2-eth1" -c "no shutdown"')
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3", "r4"]:
|
||||
compare_ted_json_output(tgen, rname, "ted_step5.json")
|
||||
@ -291,9 +279,7 @@ def test_step7():
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = setup_testcase("Step7: Disable OSPF on r4")
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.net["r4"].cmd(
|
||||
'vtysh -c "conf t" -c "no router ospf"'
|
||||
)
|
||||
tgen.net["r4"].cmd('vtysh -c "conf t" -c "no router ospf"')
|
||||
|
||||
for rname in ["r1", "r2", "r3"]:
|
||||
compare_ted_json_output(tgen, rname, "ted_step7.json")
|
||||
|
@ -135,25 +135,35 @@ def test_wait_protocol_convergence():
|
||||
* Full/DROther
|
||||
* Full/Backup
|
||||
"""
|
||||
result = tgen.gears[router].vtysh_cmd('show ip ospf neighbor json',
|
||||
isjson=True)
|
||||
if topotest.json_cmp(result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [
|
||||
{"state": "Full/DR"}]}}) is None:
|
||||
result = tgen.gears[router].vtysh_cmd(
|
||||
"show ip ospf neighbor json", isjson=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
topotest.json_cmp(
|
||||
result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [{"state": "Full/DR"}]}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
is None
|
||||
):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
if topotest.json_cmp(result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [
|
||||
{"state": "Full/DROther"}]}}) is None:
|
||||
if (
|
||||
topotest.json_cmp(
|
||||
result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [{"state": "Full/DROther"}]}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
is None
|
||||
):
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
return topotest.json_cmp(result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [
|
||||
{"state": "Full/Backup"}]}})
|
||||
return topotest.json_cmp(
|
||||
result, {"neighbors": {neighbor: [{"state": "Full/Backup"}]}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_, result = topotest.run_and_expect(run_command_and_expect, None,
|
||||
count=130, wait=1)
|
||||
_, result = topotest.run_and_expect(
|
||||
run_command_and_expect, None, count=130, wait=1
|
||||
)
|
||||
assertmsg = '"{}" convergence failure'.format(router)
|
||||
assert result is None, assertmsg
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def expect_ospfv3_neighbor_full(router, neighbor):
|
||||
"Wait until OSPFv3 convergence."
|
||||
logger.info("waiting OSPFv3 router '{}'".format(router))
|
||||
|
@ -141,12 +141,19 @@ def test_ospf6_default_route():
|
||||
topotest.router_json_cmp,
|
||||
tgen.gears[router],
|
||||
"show ipv6 ospf6 database inter-prefix detail json",
|
||||
{"areaScopedLinkStateDb": [{
|
||||
"areaId": area,
|
||||
"lsa": [{
|
||||
"prefix": prefix,
|
||||
"metric": metric,
|
||||
}]}]},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"areaScopedLinkStateDb": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"areaId": area,
|
||||
"lsa": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prefix": prefix,
|
||||
"metric": metric,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
_, result = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, None, count=4, wait=1)
|
||||
assertmsg = '"{}" convergence failure'.format(router)
|
||||
|
@ -249,17 +249,20 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc31_p1(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol,
|
||||
expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Bring up OSPFd daemon on R0.")
|
||||
start_router_daemons(tgen, "r0", ["ospfd"])
|
||||
@ -482,17 +485,20 @@ def test_ospf_chaos_tc34_p1(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol,
|
||||
expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Bring up staticd daemon on R0.")
|
||||
start_router_daemons(tgen, "r0", ["staticd"])
|
||||
|
@ -259,19 +259,21 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, False)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, next_hop=nh, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for intfr in range(1, 7):
|
||||
intf = topo["routers"]["r1"]["links"]["r0-link{}".format(intfr)]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -326,10 +328,11 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(
|
||||
tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, attempts=5, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -342,10 +345,11 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc16_p0(request):
|
||||
attempts=5,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Re configure the static route in R0.")
|
||||
dut = "r0"
|
||||
@ -432,10 +436,11 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(
|
||||
tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, attempts=5, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -448,10 +453,11 @@ def test_ospf_ecmp_tc17_p0(request):
|
||||
attempts=5,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Reconfigure the static route in R0.Change ECMP value to 2.")
|
||||
dut = "r0"
|
||||
|
@ -307,10 +307,11 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(
|
||||
tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, attempts=5, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -323,10 +324,11 @@ def test_ospf_lan_ecmp_tc18_p0(request):
|
||||
attempts=5,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ def test_ospf_lan_tc1_p0(request):
|
||||
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, False)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_neighbor(tgen, topo, dut, lan=True, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r0: OSPF neighbors-hip is up \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("No Shut interface on R0")
|
||||
dut = "r0"
|
||||
|
@ -332,18 +332,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are present in fib \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Delete and reconfigure prefix list.")
|
||||
# Create ip prefix list
|
||||
@ -383,18 +385,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
pfx_list = {
|
||||
"r0": {
|
||||
@ -438,18 +442,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc19_p0(request):
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -496,18 +502,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, attempts=2, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, attempts=2, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step(
|
||||
"configure the route map with the same name that is used "
|
||||
@ -523,18 +531,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Create route map
|
||||
routemaps = {"r0": {"route_maps": {"rmap_ipv4": [{"action": "deny"}]}}}
|
||||
@ -545,18 +555,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Delete the route map.")
|
||||
# Create route map
|
||||
@ -573,18 +585,20 @@ def test_ospf_routemaps_functionality_tc20_p0(request):
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: OSPF routes are present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
write_test_footer(tc_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -247,11 +247,11 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
|
||||
if result is not True:
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present after deleting ip address of newly "
|
||||
"configured interface of R0 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"configured interface of R0 \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -264,11 +264,11 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc5_p0(request):
|
||||
attempts=5,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present in fib after deleting ip address of newly "
|
||||
"configured interface of R0 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"configured interface of R0 \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Add back the deleted ip address on newly configured interface of R0")
|
||||
topo1 = {
|
||||
@ -370,11 +370,11 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc6_p0(request):
|
||||
result = verify_ospf_rib(tgen, dut, input_dict, next_hop=nh, expected=False)
|
||||
if result is not True:
|
||||
break
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present after deleting ip address of newly "
|
||||
"configured loopback of R0 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"configured loopback of R0 \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
protocol = "ospf"
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
@ -386,11 +386,11 @@ def test_ospf_redistribution_tc6_p0(request):
|
||||
next_hop=nh,
|
||||
expected=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"r1: OSPF routes are present in fib after deleting ip address of newly "
|
||||
"configured loopback of R0 \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
))
|
||||
"configured loopback of R0 \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("Add back the deleted ip address on newly configured interface of R0")
|
||||
topo1 = {
|
||||
|
@ -94,12 +94,14 @@ def setup_module(mod):
|
||||
|
||||
tgen.start_router()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def teardown_module(_mod):
|
||||
"Teardown the pytest environment"
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
tgen.stop_topology()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_converge_protocols():
|
||||
"Wait for protocol convergence"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -110,19 +112,26 @@ def test_converge_protocols():
|
||||
|
||||
topotest.sleep(10, "Waiting for OSPF convergence")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def ospf_configure_suppress_fa(router_name, area):
|
||||
"Configure OSPF suppress-fa in router_name"
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
router = tgen.gears[router_name]
|
||||
router.vtysh_cmd("conf t\nrouter ospf\narea {} nssa suppress-fa\nexit\n".format(area))
|
||||
router.vtysh_cmd(
|
||||
"conf t\nrouter ospf\narea {} nssa suppress-fa\nexit\n".format(area)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def ospf_unconfigure_suppress_fa(router_name, area):
|
||||
"Remove OSPF suppress-fa in router_name"
|
||||
|
||||
tgen = get_topogen()
|
||||
router = tgen.gears[router_name]
|
||||
router.vtysh_cmd("conf t\nrouter ospf\nno area {} nssa suppress-fa\nexit\n".format(area))
|
||||
router.vtysh_cmd(
|
||||
"conf t\nrouter ospf\nno area {} nssa suppress-fa\nexit\n".format(area)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def ospf_get_lsa_type5(router_name):
|
||||
"Return a dict with link state id as key and forwarding addresses as value"
|
||||
@ -141,7 +150,8 @@ def ospf_get_lsa_type5(router_name):
|
||||
result[lsa] = re1.group(1)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(scope='module', name='original')
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(scope="module", name="original")
|
||||
def test_ospf_set_suppress_fa():
|
||||
"Test OSPF area [x] nssa suppress-fa"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -162,6 +172,7 @@ def test_ospf_set_suppress_fa():
|
||||
# in the test_ospf_unset_supress_fa
|
||||
return initial
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ospf_unset_supress_fa(original):
|
||||
"Test OSPF no area [x] nssa suppress-fa"
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -949,10 +949,11 @@ def static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
|
||||
result4 = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result4 is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n"
|
||||
"routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result4 is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result4
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("vm4 should be present in FRR1")
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
|
@ -947,10 +947,11 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
|
||||
result4 = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result4 is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n"
|
||||
"routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result4 is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "routes are still present \n Error: {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result4
|
||||
))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
step("vm4 should be present in FRR1")
|
||||
dut = "r1"
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user