mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/llvm-toolchain
synced 2025-06-15 09:02:24 +00:00
Add proposed upstream patch by James Clarke to add the
missing __tls_get_addr symbol to the symbol table for TLS calls on SPARC (Closes: #890401)
This commit is contained in:
parent
54d2f6d288
commit
ae9c6b6c71
6
debian/changelog
vendored
6
debian/changelog
vendored
@ -1,10 +1,16 @@
|
|||||||
llvm-toolchain-5.0 (1:5.0.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
|
llvm-toolchain-5.0 (1:5.0.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ Sylvestre Ledru ]
|
||||||
* Ignore the test tools/gold/X86/comdat.ll
|
* Ignore the test tools/gold/X86/comdat.ll
|
||||||
until https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36166
|
until https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36166
|
||||||
is fixed.
|
is fixed.
|
||||||
Will fix the ftbfs on x86
|
Will fix the ftbfs on x86
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ]
|
||||||
|
* Add proposed upstream patch by James Clarke to add the
|
||||||
|
missing __tls_get_addr symbol to the symbol table for
|
||||||
|
TLS calls on SPARC (Closes: #890401)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
-- Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:12:18 +0100
|
-- Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:12:18 +0100
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
llvm-toolchain-5.0 (1:5.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
|
llvm-toolchain-5.0 (1:5.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
|
||||||
|
1
debian/patches/series
vendored
1
debian/patches/series
vendored
@ -49,3 +49,4 @@ update-cuda-search-path.patch
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
test-keep-alive.diff
|
test-keep-alive.diff
|
||||||
libfuzzer-path.diff
|
libfuzzer-path.diff
|
||||||
|
sparc64-add-missing-tls-get-addr.diff
|
||||||
|
43
debian/patches/sparc64-add-missing-tls-get-addr.diff
vendored
Normal file
43
debian/patches/sparc64-add-missing-tls-get-addr.diff
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|||||||
|
Description: [Sparc] Include __tls_get_addr in symbol table for TLS calls to it
|
||||||
|
Global Dynamic and Local Dynamic call relocations only implicitly
|
||||||
|
reference __tls_get_addr, but it still needs to be in the symbol table
|
||||||
|
to be bound at link time otherwise it fails to link. For details, see
|
||||||
|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832.
|
||||||
|
Author: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
|
||||||
|
Last-Update: 2018-02-14
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--- llvm-toolchain-4.0-4.0.1.orig/lib/Target/Sparc/MCTargetDesc/SparcMCExpr.cpp
|
||||||
|
+++ llvm-toolchain-4.0-4.0.1/lib/Target/Sparc/MCTargetDesc/SparcMCExpr.cpp
|
||||||
|
@@ -194,14 +194,30 @@ static void fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixupsImpl
|
||||||
|
void SparcMCExpr::fixELFSymbolsInTLSFixups(MCAssembler &Asm) const {
|
||||||
|
switch(getKind()) {
|
||||||
|
default: return;
|
||||||
|
+ case VK_Sparc_TLS_GD_CALL:
|
||||||
|
+ case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDM_CALL: {
|
||||||
|
+ // The corresponding relocations reference __tls_get_addr, as they call it,
|
||||||
|
+ // but this is only implicit; there is no connection in the ELF file
|
||||||
|
+ // between the relocation and the symbol, other than the specification for
|
||||||
|
+ // the semantics of the relocations. However, the symbol must be included
|
||||||
|
+ // in our symbol table despite the lack of references to it, since it needs
|
||||||
|
+ // to be bound during linking for these relocations. For details see
|
||||||
|
+ // https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832.
|
||||||
|
+ MCSymbol *Symbol = Asm.getContext().getOrCreateSymbol("__tls_get_addr");
|
||||||
|
+ Asm.registerSymbol(*Symbol);
|
||||||
|
+ auto ELFSymbol = cast<MCSymbolELF>(Symbol);
|
||||||
|
+ if (!ELFSymbol->isBindingSet()) {
|
||||||
|
+ ELFSymbol->setBinding(ELF::STB_GLOBAL);
|
||||||
|
+ ELFSymbol->setExternal(true);
|
||||||
|
+ }
|
||||||
|
+ LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
|
||||||
|
+ }
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_GD_HI22:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_GD_LO10:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_GD_ADD:
|
||||||
|
- case VK_Sparc_TLS_GD_CALL:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDM_HI22:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDM_LO10:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDM_ADD:
|
||||||
|
- case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDM_CALL:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDO_HIX22:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDO_LOX10:
|
||||||
|
case VK_Sparc_TLS_LDO_ADD:
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user