git_remote_download() must also clear the internal push state resulting from a possible earlier push operation. Otherwise calling git_remote_update_tips() will execute the push version instead of the fetch version and among other things, tags won't be updated.
This option does not get persisted to disk, which makes it different
from the rest of the setters. Remove it until we go all the way.
We still respect the configuration option, and it's still possible to
perform a one-time prune by calling the function.
For each remote-tracking branch we want to remove, we need to consider
it against every other refspec in case we have overlapping refspecs,
such as with
refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*
as we'd otherwise remove too many refspecs.
Create a list of condidates, which are the references matching the rhs
of any active refspec and then filter that list by removing those
entries for which we find a remove reference with any active
refspec. Those which are left after this are removed.
When creating a new remote, contrary to loading one from disk,
active_refspecs was not populated. This means that if using the new
remote to push, git_push_update_tips() will be a no-op since it
checks the refspecs passed during the push against the base ones
i.e. active_refspecs. And therefore the local refs won't be created
or updated after the push operation.
This function, similar in style to git_remote_fetch(), performs all the
steps required for a push, with a similar interface.
The remote callbacks struct has learnt about the push callbacks, letting
us set the callbacks a single time instead of setting some in the remote
and some in the push operation.
If the remote is anonymous, then we cannot check for any configuration,
as there is no name. Check for this before we try to use the name, which
may be a NULL pointer.
This fixes#2697.
Before trying to rtransform using the given refspec to figure out what
the name of the upstream branch is on the remote, we must make sure that
the target of the refspec applies to the current branch's upstream.
The create function with default refspec is the same as the one with a
custom refspec, but it has the default refspec, so we can create the one
on top of the other.
Remote objects are not meant to be changed from under the user. We did
this in rename, but only the name and left the refspecs, such that a
save would save the wrong refspecs (and a fetch and anything else would
use the wrong refspecs).
Instead, let's simply take a name and not change any loaded remote from
under the user.
Git for Windows will handle UNC paths only when in forward-slash
format, eg "//server/path". When given a UNC path as a remote,
rewrite standard format ("\\server\path") into this ridiculous
format.
We don't need the remote loaded, and the function extracted both of
these from the git_remote in order to do its work, so let's remote a
step and not ask for the loaded remote at all.
This fixes#2390.
When a list of refspecs is passed to fetch (what git would consider
refspec passed on the command-line), we not only need to perform the
updates described in that refspec, but also update the remote-tracking
branch of the fetched remote heads according to the remote's configured
refspecs.
These "fetches" are not however to be written to FETCH_HEAD as they
would be duplicate data, and it's not what the user asked for.
The configured/base fetch refspecs need to be taken into account in
order to implement opportunistic remote-tracking branch updates. DWIM
them and store them in the struct, but don't do anything with them yet.
We can only DWIM when we've connected to the remote and have the list of
the remote's references. Adding or setting the refspecs should not
trigger an attempt to DWIM the refspecs as we typically cannot do it,
and even if we did, we would not use them for the current fetch.
With opportunistic ref updates, git has introduced the concept of having
base refspecs *and* refspecs that are active for a particular fetch.
Let's start by letting the user override the refspecs for download.
This option make it easy to ignore anything about the server we're
connecting to, which is bad security practice. This was necessary as we
didn't use to expose detailed information about the certificate, but now
that we do, we should get rid of this.
If the user wants to ignore everything, they can still provide a
callback which ignores all the information passed.
If the certificate validation fails (or always in the case of ssh),
let the user decide whether to allow the connection.
The data structure passed to the user is the native certificate
information from the underlying implementation, namely OpenSSL or
WinHTTP.
