We've been using `p_ftruncate()` to extend the packfile in order to mmap
it and write the new data into it. This works well in the general case,
but as truncation does not allocate space in the filesystem, it must do
so when we write data to it.
The only way the OS has to indicate a failure to allocate space is via
SIGBUS which means we tried to write outside the file. This will cause
everyone to crash as they don't expect to handle this signal.
Switch to using `p_lseek()` and `p_write()` to extend the file in a way
which tells the filesystem to allocate the space for the missing
data. We can then be sure that we have space to write into.
A remote's URLs are now modified according to the url.*.insteadOf
and url.*.pushInsteadOf configurations. This allows a user to
replace URL prefixes by setting the corresponding keys. E.g.
"url.foo.insteadOf = bar" would replace the prefix "bar" with the
new prefix "foo".
We do not error on "merge conflicts"; on the contrary, merge conflicts
are a normal part of merging. We only error on "checkout conflicts",
where a change exists in the index or the working directory that would
otherwise be overwritten by performing the checkout.
This *may* happen during merge (after the production of the new index
that we're going to checkout) but it could happen during any checkout.
If there exists a conflict in the index, but no file in the working
directory, this implies that the user wants to accept the resolution
by removing the file. Thus, remove the conflict entry from the
index, instead of trying to add a (nonexistent) file.
Mark the `old_file` and `new_file` sides of a delta with a new bit,
`GIT_DIFF_FLAG_EXISTS`, that introduces that a particular side of
the delta exists in the diff.
This is useful for indicating whether a working directory item exists
or not, in the presence of a conflict. Diff users may have previously
used DELETED to determine this information.
It's not always obvious the mapping between stage level and
conflict-ness. More importantly, this can lead otherwise sane
people to write constructs like `if (!git_index_entry_stage(entry))`,
which (while technically correct) is unreadable.
Provide a nice method to help avoid such messy thinking.
Since a diff entry only concerns a single entry, zero the information
for the index side of a conflict. (The index entry would otherwise
erroneously include the lowest-stage index entry - generally the
ancestor of a conflict.)
Test that during status, the index side of the conflict is empty.
When diffing against an index, return a new `GIT_DELTA_CONFLICTED`
delta type for items that are conflicted. For a single file path,
only one delta will be produced (despite the fact that there are
multiple entries in the index).
Index iterators now have the (optional) ability to return conflicts
in the index. Prior to this change, they would be omitted, and callers
(like diff) would omit conflicted index entries entirely.
Wrap the iterator current / advance functions so that we can extend
them, but also handle GIT_ITEROVER cases in the iterator funcs
instead of the callers.
When we moved from acting on the instance to acting on the
configuration, we dropped the validation of the passed refspec, which
can lead to writing an invalid refspec to the configuration. Bring that
validation back.
The public key field is optional and as such can take NULL. Account for
that and do not call strlen() on NULL values. Also assert() for non-NULL
values of username & private key.
Declare GIT_CREDTYPE_SSH_MEMORY to have consistent API independently of
whether libgit2 was built with or without in-memory key passing support.
Or rather, to have it at all since build-time definitions are not stored
in headers.
When we look for which remote corresponds to a remote-tracking branch,
we look in the refspecs to see which ones matches. If none do, we should
abort. We currently ignore the error message from this operation, so
let's not do that anymore.
As part of the test we're writing, let's test for the expected behaviour
if we cannot find a refspec which tells us what the remote-tracking
branch for a remote would look like.
When we find out that we're dealing with a matching refspec, we set the
flag and return immediately. This leaves the strings as NULL, which
breaks the contract.
Assign these pointers to a string with the correct values.
When we discover that we want to keep a negative rule, make sure to
clear the error variable, as it we otherwise return whatever was left by
the previous loop iteration.
This can be used by tools to show mesages about failing to communicate
with the server. The error message in this case will often contain the
server's error message, as far as it managed to send anything.
When we fail to read from stdout, it's typically because the URL was
wrong and the server process has sent some output over its stderr
output.
Read that output and set the error message to whatever we read from it.
We set an error if we get an error when reading, but we don't bother
setting an error message for write failing. This causes a cryptic error
to be shown to the user when the target filesystem is full.
These were left over from the culling as it's not clear which use-cases
might benefit from this. It is not clear that we want to support any
use-case which depends on changing the remote's idea of the base
refspecs rather than passing in different per-operation refspec list, so
remove these functions.
This function deals with functions doing IO which means the amount of
errors that can happen is quit large. It does not help if it always
ovewrites the underlying error message with a less understandable
version of "something went wrong".
Instead, only use this generic message if there was no error set by the
callback.
Instead of going through each entry we have and re-adding, which may not
even be correct for certain crlf options and has bad performance, use
the function which performs a diff against the worktree and try to add
and remove files from that list.
