On a case-insensitive filesystem, we need to deal with case-changing
renames (eg, foo -> FOO) by removing the old and adding the new,
exactly as if we were on a case-sensitive filesystem.
Update the `checkout::tree::can_cancel_checkout_from_notify` test, now
that notifications are always sent case sensitively.
Path validation may be influenced by `core.protectHFS` and
`core.protectNTFS` configuration settings, thus treebuilders
can take a repository to influence their configuration.
HFS filesystems ignore some characters like U+200C. When these
characters are included in a path, they will be ignored for the
purposes of comparison with other paths. Thus, if you have a ".git"
folder, a folder of ".git<U+200C>" will also match. Protect our
".git" folder by ensuring that ".git<U+200C>" and friends do not match it.
Disallow:
1. paths with trailing dot
2. paths with trailing space
3. paths with trailing colon
4. paths that are 8.3 short names of .git folders ("GIT~1")
5. paths that are reserved path names (COM1, LPT1, etc).
6. paths with reserved DOS characters (colons, asterisks, etc)
These paths would (without \\?\ syntax) be elided to other paths - for
example, ".git." would be written as ".git". As a result, writing these
paths literally (using \\?\ syntax) makes them hard to operate with from
the shell, Windows Explorer or other tools. Disallow these.
When turning UTF-8 paths into UCS-2 paths for Windows, always use
the \\?\-prefixed paths. Because this bypasses the system's
path canonicalization, handle the canonicalization functions ourselves.
We must:
1. always use a backslash as a directory separator
2. only use a single backslash between directories
3. not rely on the system to translate "." and ".." in paths
4. remove trailing backslashes, except at the drive root (C:\)
We do not currently generate any messages when we're counting the
objects, as might be expected from a local upload-pack. Assert that we
do call the function when working.
This option does not get persisted to disk, which makes it different
from the rest of the setters. Remove it until we go all the way.
We still respect the configuration option, and it's still possible to
perform a one-time prune by calling the function.
This is hiding a bug in the prune code, whereby we prune references we
shouldn't but don't notice it in the code afterwards because
update_tips() recreates them.
This means that we do perform changes to the references (and get rid of
the reflogs) when we shouldn't.
Given
top
!top/foo
in an ignore file, we should not unignore top/foo. This is an
implementation detail of the git code leaking, but that's the behaviour
we should show.
A negation rule can only negate an exact rule it has seen before.
