The logic here is that the attestation is more than just the PCR0 value, and
multiple device firmware (such as EC, ME, etc.) needs to be included to validate
the system.
By the same logic, updates for the system firmware do not tell the whole story,
and confuse HSI as a specification. Remove them.
For instance, we can tell the user that UEFI UpdateCapsule is disabled in the
system firmware, or that efivarfs is not mounted. This is much better than
creating "dummy" devices which are really just hacks around the problem because
no better API existed. THe dummy devices cause as many problems as they solve.
Plugins have to set FWUPD_PLUGIN_FLAG_USER_WARNING if a warning should be shown
to the user, and only one warning will be shown of each failure type.
It is expected that GUI clients like gnome-software and gnome-firmware would use
this API to notify the user the localized message for why firmware updates are
not being shown.
Fixes https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/2456
Firsly, that HSI isn't expected for embedded devices and then secondary how we
require SecureBoot to be available for HSI:1
At the moment we get a runtime failure if it is disabled. Making SB a part of
`HSI:1` makes this requiremnt explicit and prevents us getting `HSI:2!` if it
is not available.
We don't actually need either of the things it provides (looking up in source
and built, and converting to an absolute path) so just replace it with
g_build_filename() instead.
This also has the advantage that it does the right thing on Windows.
This allows end-users testing a specific plugin to start fwupd with an extra
command line parameter, e.g. `--plugin-verbose=unifying` to output a lot of
debugging information to the console for that specific plugin.
This replaces a lot of ad-hoc environment variables with different naming
conventions.
This allows us to do two things:
* Attach after a failed update, so the user isn't left with 'dead' hardware
* Split the detach and attach actions into different plugins in the future
This also allows us to have a separate vfunc to get the new version number
after flashing the firmware, as this may be handled in a different plugin to
the detach phase.
When fwupd is installed in long-term support distros it's very hard to backport
new versions as new hardware is released.
There are several reasons why we can't just include the mapping and quirk
information in the AppStream metadata:
* The extra data is hugely specific to the installed fwupd plugin versions
* The device-id is per-device, and the mapping is usually per-plugin
* Often the information is needed before the FuDevice is created
* There are security implications in allowing plugins to handle new devices
The idea with quirks is that the end user can drop an additional (or replace
an existing) file in a .d director with a simple format and the hardware will
magically start working. This assumes no new quirks are required, as this would
obviously need code changes, but allows us to get most existing devices working
in an easy way without the user compiling anything.
This allows us to fix issues like https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/issues/265
docbook2man's --output argument is expecting a directory
feeding it the location of the man page just puts the man page
under a directory with the same name in the build directory.
Automake and autoconf are impossible to fully understand and Meson now provides
everything we need for a much smaller, faster, and more understandable build.
See http://mesonbuild.com/ for more information.
This was added for cosmetic reasons, and including the version makes the
generated html documentation change every release even if there were no API
changes.
This is a large commit that removes all the providers and turns them into
plugins. I think having both providers _and_ plugins was super confusing.
Plugins are loaded at runtime so you could in theory develop a new plugin
without putting it in the fwupd source tree, although there are no installed
headers or PC files as I'm not sure it's a good idea at this stage.
This commit moves all the per-provider docs, tests, notes, debug dumps and test
data to plugin-specific directories -- these also allows the plugin author to
"own" more of the source tree so we don't enforce fu- prefixes and the style
guide everywhere.
This allows us to run the same action on all the plugins in the future, so we
could have a prepare(FuPlugin, FuDevice) and cleanup(FuPlugin, FuDevice) run
on *all* plugins, so doing an update using one plugin would allow us to work
around hardware quirks in other plugins.
If I've broken your out-of-tree provider it's trivial to port to the new API
with sed and a fixed up build file. If you need help please let me know.
