A wrong pointer was being passed to EFI_PXE_BASE_CODE_TFTP_READ_FILE,
preventing us from getting the file size back from the tftp call, ensuring
that we don't have enough information to properly secureboot-validate the
retrieved image.
Right now the CA is checking if shim builds expose a particular version
of the shim protocol. To do this, they're looking for SHIM_LOCK_GUID's
value in the resulting binary.
Currently, with SHIM_LOCK_GUID as a macro that gets assigned to local
variables, that means they have to compensate for mov instructions mixed
in with the actual value. This is completely absurd, so promote it to a
first-class object with a symbol to make it both easy to find and
continuous.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
With this change, the embedded certificate and dbx lists (vendor_cert,
vendor_cert_size, vendor_dbx, and vendor_dbx_size) wind up being in a
section named .vendor_cert, and so will look something like:
------
fenchurch:~/devel/github.com/shim$ objdump -h shim.efi
shim.efi: file format pei-x86-64
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
0 .eh_frame 000174a8 0000000000005000 0000000000005000 00000400 2**3
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
1 .text 000aa7e1 000000000001d000 000000000001d000 00017a00 2**4
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
2 .reloc 0000000a 00000000000c8000 00000000000c8000 000c2200 2**0
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
3 .data 00031228 00000000000c9000 00000000000c9000 000c2400 2**5
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
4 .vendor_cert 00000375 00000000000fb000 00000000000fb000 000f3800 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY
5 .dynamic 000000f0 00000000000fc000 00000000000fc000 000f3c00 2**3
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
6 .rela 0002afa8 00000000000fd000 00000000000fd000 000f3e00 2**3
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
7 .dynsym 0000f1f8 0000000000128000 0000000000128000 0011ee00 2**3
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
------
This simplifies a security audit, because it means that different
versions of shim with substantially the same code with different keys
will be more easily comperable, and therefore logic differences may be
more easily identified.
This also means that if there's a trusted build you want to use, you can
remove the certificates, implant new ones, and have it signed, and the
code sections won't change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
GCC 4.8.0 will try to use these by default, and you'll wind up looping
across the (uninitialized!) trap handler for uninitialized instructions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
I'm told rebooting is sometimes unreliable when called here, and we'll
get bootx64.efi loaded anyway. I'll just assume that's true and try to
load the first option, since it's clearly what we'd prefer happens next.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
