mirror of
https://github.com/nodejs/node.git
synced 2025-05-03 22:25:44 +00:00
7c079d1261
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15454 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14387 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14722 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14717 Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/15448 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
27 lines
981 B
JavaScript
27 lines
981 B
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
// Flags: --expose-internals
|
|
const common = require('../common');
|
|
|
|
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks');
|
|
const internal = require('internal/process/next_tick');
|
|
|
|
// In tests async_hooks dynamic checks are enabled by default. To verify
|
|
// that no checks are enabled ordinarily disable the checks in this test.
|
|
common.revert_force_async_hooks_checks();
|
|
|
|
// When async_hooks is diabled (or never enabled), the checks
|
|
// should be disabled as well. This is important while async_hooks is
|
|
// experimental and there are still critial bugs to fix.
|
|
|
|
// Using undefined as the triggerAsyncId.
|
|
// Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14386
|
|
// Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14381
|
|
// Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14368
|
|
internal.nextTick(undefined, common.mustCall());
|
|
|
|
// Negative asyncIds and invalid type name
|
|
async_hooks.emitInit(-1, null, -1, {});
|
|
async_hooks.emitBefore(-1, -1);
|
|
async_hooks.emitAfter(-1);
|
|
async_hooks.emitDestroy(-1);
|