The existing assertion was misleading to whether there were too few or
too many events of a particular type. Improve the assertion message.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27601
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Fix some issues introduced/not fixed via
https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25094:
* Init hook is not emitted for a reused HTTPParser
* HTTPParser was still used as resource in init hook
* type used in init hook was always HTTPINCOMINGMESSAGE even for client
requests
* some tests have not been adapted to new resource names
With this change the async hooks init event is emitted during a call
to Initialize() as the type and resource object is available at this
time. As a result Initialize() must be called now which could be seen
as breaking change even HTTPParser is not part of documented API.
It was needed to put the ClientRequest instance into a wrapper object
instead passing it directly as async resource otherwise
test-domain-multi fails. I think this is because adding an EventEmitter
to a Domain adds a property 'domain' and the presence of this changes
the context propagation in domains.
Besides that tests still refering to resource HTTPParser have been
updated/improved.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27467
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26961
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25094
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27477
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26163
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26163
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18018
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
currentId is renamed to executionAsyncId
triggerId is renamed to triggerAsyncId
AsyncResource.triggerId is renamed to AsyncResource.triggerAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetCurrentId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetExecutionAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetTriggerId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetTriggerAsyncId
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13490
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Improve error messages in the async hooks tests, mostly by removing
unhelpful `message` parameters for assertions.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13243
Reviewed-By: Kunal Pathak <kunal.pathak@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Async wrap providers tested:
- crypto.randomBytes
- crypto.pbkdf2
- fs event wrap
- fsreqwrap access
- fsreqwrap readFile
- getaddrinforeq wrap
- getnameinforeq wrap
- pipe connect wrap
- query wrap
- pipewrap
- processwrap
- shutdown wrap
- tcpwrap
- udpwrap
- send wrap
- detailed signal wrap
- statwatcher
- timerwrap via setTimeout
- timerwrap via setInterval
- for Immediate
- http parser request
- http parser response
- connection via ssl server
- tls wrap
- write wrap
- ttywrap via readstream
- ttywrap via wriream
- zctx via zlib binding deflate
Embedder API:
- async-event tests
- one test looks at the happy paths
- another ensures that in cases of events emitted in an order that
doesn't make sense, the order is enforced by async hooks throwing a
meaningful error
- embedder enforcement tests are split up since async hook stack
corruption now the process
- therefore we launch a child and check for error output of the offending code
Additional tests:
- tests that show that we can enable/disable hooks inside their lifetime
events
- tests that verify the graph of resources triggering the creation of
other resources
Test Helpers:
- init-hooks:
- returns one collector instance
- when created an async hook is created and the lifetime events are
registered to call the appropriate collector functions
- the collector also exposes `enable` and `disable` functions which call
through to the async hook
- hook checks:
- checks invocations of life time hooks against the actual invocations
that were collected
- in some cases like `destroy` a min/max range of invocations can be
supplied since in these cases the exact number is non-deterministic
- verify graph:
- verifies the triggerIds of specific async resources are as expected,
i.e. the creation of resources was triggered by the resource we expect
- includes a printGraph function to generate easily readable test
input for verify graph
- both functions prune TickObjects to create less brittle and easier
to understand tests
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
