PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37798
Refs: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/960
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <lxxyxzj@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Using new AbortController, add support for promisified
exec to be cancelled.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34249
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
If an AbortController passed to execfile() is already aborted, use the
same behavior as if the controller was aborted after calling execfile().
This mimics the behavior of fetch in the browser.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36644
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Test that reusing an aborted AbortController with execfile() results in
immediate SIGTERM.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36644
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
I was working on AbortSignal for spawn and noticed there is a leak in
the current code for AbortSignal support in child_process since it
removes the wrong listener. I used the new signal as argument feature
to make removing the listener easier and added a test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36424
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Verify that if something different than Abortcontroller.signal is passed
to child_process.execFile(), ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is thrown.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36429
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Useful for executing in a shell because it accepts arguments as
an array instead of a string as exec does.
Depending on the circumstances,
that can prove to be useful if the arguments are already prepared.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18384
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reimplement uv.errname() as internal/util.getSystemErrorName() to
avoid the memory leaks caused by unknown error codes
and avoid calling into C++ for the error names. Also
expose it as a public API for external use.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18186
Refs: http://docs.libuv.org/en/v1.x/errors.html#c.uv_err_name
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Adds a new `../common/fixtures' module to begin normalizing
`test/fixtures` use. Our test code is a bit inconsistent with
regards to use of the fixtures directory. Some code uses
`path.join()`, some code uses string concats, some other
code uses template strings, etc. In mnay cases, significant
duplication of code is seen when accessing fixture files, etc.
This updates many (but by no means all) of the tests in the
test suite to use the new consistent API. There are still
many more to update, which would make an excelent Code-n-Learn
exercise.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14332
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
This commit adds a test which brings coverage of
lib/child_process.js to 100%. It adds coverage for the call to
uv.errname() in execFile()'s exithandler() function.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12367
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
While `child_process.execFile()` gets called in places in the test
suite, there are no explicit test for it and there are parts of the
implementation that are not covered by tests. This adds a minimal test
that increases (but does not complete) coverage for the implementation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11929
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>