Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rich Trott
aa6fac68da test: adjust indentation for stricter linting
ESLint 4.x has stricter linting than previous versions. We are currently
using the legacy indentation rules in the test directory. This commit
changes the indentation of files to comply with the stricter 4.x linting
and enable stricter linting in the test directory.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14431
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
2017-07-27 09:24:20 -07:00
Vse Mozhet Byt
4f87522244 doc, lib, test: do not re-require needlessly
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14244
Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
2017-07-21 20:40:52 +03:00
Rich Trott
380929ec0c test: remove common.noop
This change removes `common.noop` from the Node.js internal testing
common module.

Over the last few weeks, I've grown to dislike the `common.noop`
abstraction.

First, new (and experienced) contributors are unaware of it and so it
results in a large number of low-value nits on PRs. It also increases
the number of things newcomers and infrequent contributors have to be
aware of to be effective on the project.

Second, it is confusing. Is it a singleton/property or a getter? Which
should be expected? This can lead to subtle and hard-to-find bugs. (To
my knowledge, none have landed on master. But I also think it's only a
matter of time.)

Third, the abstraction is low-value in my opinion. What does it really
get us? A case could me made that it is without value at all.

Lastly, and this is minor, but the abstraction is wordier than not using
the abstraction. `common.noop` doesn't save anything over `() => {}`.

So, I propose removing it.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12822
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
2017-07-03 11:39:35 -07:00
James M Snell
4f2e372716 test: add common.noop, default for common.mustCall()
Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use.
Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify
test cases.

Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
2017-03-26 12:47:15 -07:00
Ben Schmidt
3c92200d8b
tty: add ref() so process.stdin.ref() etc. work
Also squashed from:
* test: move tty-wrap isrefed test to pseudo-tty/
* test: test tty-wrap handle isrefed properly
* test: improve failure messages in isrefed tests

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7360
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell.gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
2017-02-28 18:44:05 +01:00
Brian White
2bc7841d0f
test: use random ports where possible
This helps to prevent issues where a failed test can keep a bound
socket open long enough to cause other tests to fail with EADDRINUSE
because the same port number is used.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7045
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
2016-06-10 22:30:55 -04:00
Jeremiah Senkpiel
fe4837afcc handle_wrap: IsRefed() -> HasRef()
Rename slightly to HasRef() at bnoordhuis’ request.
Better reflects what we actually do for this check.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6395
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6204
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6401
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6382
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6381

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6546
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
2016-05-11 17:43:57 -04:00
Jeremiah Senkpiel
96a9439fd2 Revert "handle_wrap: IsRefed -> Unrefed, no isAlive check"
This reverts commit 9bb5a5e2a1.

This API is not suitable because it depended on being able to
potentially access the handle's flag after the handle was already
cleaned up. Since this is not actually possible (obviously, oops)
this newer API no longer makes much sense, and the older API is more
suitable.

API comparison:
IsRefed -> Has a strong reference AND is alive. (Deterministic)
Unrefed -> Has a weak reference OR is dead. (Less deterministic)

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6395
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6204
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6401
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6382
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6381

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6546
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	src/handle_wrap.cc
	test/parallel/test-handle-wrap-isrefed-tty.js
	test/parallel/test-handle-wrap-isrefed.js
2016-05-11 17:43:48 -04:00
Ben Noordhuis
428240519c test: check that 2nd handle.close() call is a nop
Verify that a second call to handle.close() is a no-op.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6395
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
2016-04-27 16:27:30 +02:00
Ben Noordhuis
a58d4839af src: simplify handlewrap state tracking logic
This also updates the tests to expect that a closed handle has no
reference count.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6395
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
2016-04-27 16:27:28 +02:00
Jeremiah Senkpiel
9bb5a5e2a1 handle_wrap: IsRefed -> Unrefed, no isAlive check
This fixes my perceived usability issues with 7d8882b. Which, at the
time of writing, has not landed in any release except v6 RCs. This
should not be considered a breaking change due to that.

It is useful if you have a handle, even if it has been closed, to be
able to inspect whether that handle was unrefed or not. As such, this
renames the method accordingly. If people need to check a handle's
aliveness, that is a separate API we should consider exposing.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5834
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6204
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
2016-04-25 18:17:40 -04:00
Jeremiah Senkpiel
7d8882ba9a handle_wrap: expose an isRefed() check to JS
This allows third-party tools to check whether or not a handle that
can be unreferenced is unreferenced at a particular time.
Notably, this should be helpful for inspection via AsyncWrap.

Also, this is useful even to node's internals, particularly timers.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5828
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5827
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5834
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
2016-04-07 12:44:19 -04:00