PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54229
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53933
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jake Yuesong Li <jake.yuesong@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54147
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Deokjin Kim <deokjin81.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34111
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53619
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
This commit moves the documentation for two CLI flags to the
proper sorted location.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53926
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
This commit adds a filePath getter to the TestContext and
SuiteContext classes. This allows a context to be mapped back to
the original test file that created it, even if it was imported
from another file. This is useful for mapping features like test
snapshots to the correct test file. This is also prep work for
supporting running test files in the test runner process.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53853
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53636
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53553
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Tooling in the ecosystem have been using the __esModule property to
recognize transpiled ESM in consuming code. For example, a 'log'
package written in ESM:
export function log(val) { console.log(val); }
Can be transpiled as:
exports.__esModule = true;
exports.default = function log(val) { console.log(val); }
The consuming code may be written like this in ESM:
import log from 'log'
Which gets transpiled to:
const _mod = require('log');
const log = _mod.__esModule ? _mod.default : _mod;
So to allow transpiled consuming code to recognize require()'d real ESM
as ESM and pick up the default exports, we add a __esModule property by
building a source text module facade for any module that has a default
export and add .__esModule = true to the exports. We don't do this to
modules that don't have default exports to avoid the unnecessary
overhead. This maintains the enumerability of the re-exported names
and the live binding of the exports.
The source of the facade is defined as a constant per-isolate property
required_module_facade_source_string, which looks like this
export * from 'original';
export { default } from 'original';
export const __esModule = true;
And the 'original' module request is always resolved by
createRequiredModuleFacade() to wrap which is a ModuleWrap wrapping
over the original module.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52166
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52134
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53784
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
It is confusing to have both ERR_CRYPTO_SCRYPT_INVALID_PARAMETER and
ERR_CRYPTO_INVALID_SCRYPT_PARAMS. The former was the original error
code, added in 371103dae8, but parameter
validation gradually changed and now produces
ERR_CRYPTO_INVALID_SCRYPT_PARAMS for all parameter validation errors
coming from OpenSSL, as well as different error codes for validation
errors coming from JavaScript. The only remaining use of
ERR_CRYPTO_SCRYPT_INVALID_PARAMETER is in the validation logic that
ensures that no two synonymous options were passed. We already have an
error code for that particular case, ERR_INCOMPATIBLE_OPTION_PAIR, so
replace these last instances of ERR_CRYPTO_SCRYPT_INVALID_PARAMETER with
that error code and remove ERR_CRYPTO_SCRYPT_INVALID_PARAMETER. If there
ever is need again for such an error code, we can just use
ERR_CRYPTO_INVALID_SCRYPT_PARAMS.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35093
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21525
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20816
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53305
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53682
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53721
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53664
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
