This PR updates the current `--experimental-modules` implementation
based on the work of the modules team and reflects Phase 2 of our
new modules plan.
The largest differences from the current implementation include
* `packge.type` which can be either `module` or `commonjs`
- `type: "commonjs"`:
- `.js` is parsed as commonjs
- default for entry point without an extension is commonjs
- `type: "module"`:
- `.js` is parsed as esm
- does not support loading JSON or Native Module by default
- default for entry point without an extension is esm
* `--entry-type=[mode]`
- allows you set the type on entry point.
* A new file extension `.cjs`.
- this is specifically to support importing commonjs in the
`module` mode.
- this is only in the esm loader, the commonjs loader remains
untouched, but the extension will work in the old loader if you use
the full file path.
* `--es-module-specifier-resolution=[type]`
- options are `explicit` (default) and `node`
- by default our loader will not allow for optional extensions in
the import, the path for a module must include the extension if
there is one
- by default our loader will not allow for importing directories that
have an index file
- developers can use `--es-module-specifier-resolution=node` to
enable the commonjs specifier resolution algorithm
- This is not a “feature” but rather an implementation for
experimentation. It is expected to change before the flag is
removed
* `--experimental-json-loader`
- the only way to import json when `"type": "module"`
- when enable all `import 'thing.json'` will go through the
experimental loader independent of mode
- based on https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4315
* You can use `package.main` to set an entry point for a module
- the file extensions used in main will be resolved based on the
`type` of the module
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/blob/master/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/pull/180
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/6
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/12
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pull/28
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/issues/255
Refs: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4315
Refs: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/770
Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com>
Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Plaice <evanplaice@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26745
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Also consistently import the `common` module where possible.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19409
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
This adds support for ensuring that the top-level main into Node is
supported loading when it has no extension for backwards-compat with
NodeJS bin workflows.
In addition package.json caching is implemented in the module lookup
process.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18728
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
The reason is that absolute URLs do not go through extension and index
checks. By switching to an absolute path, the resolver still applies
extensions properly to the top-level main.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16526
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/16476
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
