Relax the check regarding presence of async resources in graph to
allow extra events. Before this change events not mentioned in
reference graph were allowed but that one specified must match
exactly in count. Now it's allowed to have more events of this
type.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27477
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27617
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27742
Reviewed-By: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <ofrobots@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The existing assertion was misleading to whether there were too few or
too many events of a particular type. Improve the assertion message.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27601
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Fix some issues introduced/not fixed via
https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25094:
* Init hook is not emitted for a reused HTTPParser
* HTTPParser was still used as resource in init hook
* type used in init hook was always HTTPINCOMINGMESSAGE even for client
requests
* some tests have not been adapted to new resource names
With this change the async hooks init event is emitted during a call
to Initialize() as the type and resource object is available at this
time. As a result Initialize() must be called now which could be seen
as breaking change even HTTPParser is not part of documented API.
It was needed to put the ClientRequest instance into a wrapper object
instead passing it directly as async resource otherwise
test-domain-multi fails. I think this is because adding an EventEmitter
to a Domain adds a property 'domain' and the presence of this changes
the context propagation in domains.
Besides that tests still refering to resource HTTPParser have been
updated/improved.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27467
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26961
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25094
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27477
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26163
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26163
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18018
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
currentId is renamed to executionAsyncId
triggerId is renamed to triggerAsyncId
AsyncResource.triggerId is renamed to AsyncResource.triggerAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetCurrentId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetExecutionAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetTriggerId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetTriggerAsyncId
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13490
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Improve error messages in the async hooks tests, mostly by removing
unhelpful `message` parameters for assertions.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13243
Reviewed-By: Kunal Pathak <kunal.pathak@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Async wrap providers tested:
- crypto.randomBytes
- crypto.pbkdf2
- fs event wrap
- fsreqwrap access
- fsreqwrap readFile
- getaddrinforeq wrap
- getnameinforeq wrap
- pipe connect wrap
- query wrap
- pipewrap
- processwrap
- shutdown wrap
- tcpwrap
- udpwrap
- send wrap
- detailed signal wrap
- statwatcher
- timerwrap via setTimeout
- timerwrap via setInterval
- for Immediate
- http parser request
- http parser response
- connection via ssl server
- tls wrap
- write wrap
- ttywrap via readstream
- ttywrap via wriream
- zctx via zlib binding deflate
Embedder API:
- async-event tests
- one test looks at the happy paths
- another ensures that in cases of events emitted in an order that
doesn't make sense, the order is enforced by async hooks throwing a
meaningful error
- embedder enforcement tests are split up since async hook stack
corruption now the process
- therefore we launch a child and check for error output of the offending code
Additional tests:
- tests that show that we can enable/disable hooks inside their lifetime
events
- tests that verify the graph of resources triggering the creation of
other resources
Test Helpers:
- init-hooks:
- returns one collector instance
- when created an async hook is created and the lifetime events are
registered to call the appropriate collector functions
- the collector also exposes `enable` and `disable` functions which call
through to the async hook
- hook checks:
- checks invocations of life time hooks against the actual invocations
that were collected
- in some cases like `destroy` a min/max range of invocations can be
supplied since in these cases the exact number is non-deterministic
- verify graph:
- verifies the triggerIds of specific async resources are as expected,
i.e. the creation of resources was triggered by the resource we expect
- includes a printGraph function to generate easily readable test
input for verify graph
- both functions prune TickObjects to create less brittle and easier
to understand tests
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
