`fs.copyFile()` supports copy-on-write operation
if the underlying platform supports it by passing a mode flag.
This behavior was added in
a16d88d9e9.
This patch adds `mode` flag to `fs.cp()`, `fs.cpSync()`,
and `fsPromises.cp()` to allow to change their behaviors
to copy files.
This test case is based on the test case that was introduced
when we add `fs.constants.COPYFILE_FICLONE`.
a16d88d9e9.
This test strategy is:
- If the platform supports copy-on-write operation,
check whether the destination is expected
- Otherwise, the operation will fail
and check whether the failure error information is expected.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/47080
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47084
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
The name of the position being validated by validatePosition()
was not being used. Instead, the string 'position' was being
used everywhere. It worked out because the only call sites were
using the name 'position' as well.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/44767
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daeyeon Jeong <daeyeon.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Kohei Ueno <kohei.ueno119@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Moves DEP0162 to End-of-Life.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42796
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
The FS docs wrongfully indicated support for passing object with an own
`toString` function property to `FileHandle.prototype.appendFile`,
`FileHandle.prototype.writeFile`, `FileHandle.prototype.write`,
`fsPromises.writeFile`, and `fs.writeSync`. This commit fixes that, and
adds some test to ensure the actual behavior is aligned with the docs.
It also fixes a bug that makes the process crash if a non-buffer object
was passed to `FileHandle.prototype.write`.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34993
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41677
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/41666
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Add types to @returns JSDoc annotations where the type is missing.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41130
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
This reverts c380ee6785.
uv_fs_write returns an int, so it is not possible to ask
it to write more than INT32_MAX.
Instead, validate 'length' is an int32 in JS to avoid
the assertion failure.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38546
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37216
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ian Sutherland <ian@iansutherland.ca>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
The `flag` and `mode` options were not being validated correctly.
Signed-off-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/37430
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37480
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ExE Boss <3889017+ExE-Boss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37028
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37051
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
I added a new custom ESLint rule to fix these problems.
We have a lot of replaceable codes with primordials.
Accessing built-in objects is restricted by existing rule
(no-restricted-globals), but accessing property in the built-in objects
is not restricted right now. We manually review codes that can be
replaced by primordials, but there's a lot of code that actually needs
to be fixed. We have often made pull requests to replace the primordials
with.
Restrict accessing global built-in objects such as `Promise`.
Restrict calling static methods such as `Array.from` or `Symbol.for`.
Don't restrict prototype methods to prevent false-positive.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35448
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
This is to unsure that code using those methods won't crash if the
methods are deleted in userland.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35837
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
This is a follow up to #35494 to add a deprecation warning when
using recursive rmdir. This only warns if you are attempting
to remove a file or a nonexistent path.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35562
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
This commit updates validateRmOptions() to throw on input
validation failures. This is consistent with how Node handles
validation in most places across the codebase.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35602
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
The validation code for the rm/rmdir functions treated the
options as distinct parameters instead of the options properties
that they are. This commit updates the validation to treat them
like properties.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35565
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
This commit updates rm() to use the EISDIR constant with
ERR_FS_EISDIR instead of hard coding -21.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35563
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a new method fs.rm that provides the behaviour of
rimraf when used with the recursive: true and force: true options.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35494
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruyadorno@github.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
This will be a start to generalize all argument validation
errors. As currently we throw ARG/OPT, OUT_OF_RANGE, and other more
specific errors.
The OPT errors didn't bring much to the errors as it's just another
variant of ARG error which is sometimes more confusing (some of our code
used OPT errors to denote just argument validation errors presumably
because of similarity of OPT to 'option' and not 'options-object')
and they don't specify the name of the options object where the invalid
value is located. Much better approach would be to just specify path
to the invalid value in the name of the value as it is done in this PR
(i.e. 'options.format', 'options.publicKey.type' etc)
Also since this decreases a variety of errors we have it'd be easier to
reuse validation code across the codebase.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31251
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34070#discussion_r467251009
Signed-off-by: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34682
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Removes the else after return to match rest of the style of
the function.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/33496
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Use the namespaced (with the \\?\ prefix) paths for symlink targets when
the path is absolute. This allows creation of symlinks to files with
long filenames.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27795
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/33351
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
