This could be in preparation of implementing the jsdoc/check-types
ESLint rule.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40989
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Add missing semicolons that will be flagged when we update
@babel/eslint-parser to 7.16.0.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40720
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
eslint-babel-plugin will complain about this semicolon when we update
to 7.14.15.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39094
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36734
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Pooja D P <Pooja.D.P@ibm.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34158
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Digging in to the delta between V8's source map library, and chromium's
the most significant difference that jumped out at me was that we were
failing to sort generated columns. Since negative offsets are not
restricted in the spec, this can lead to bugs.
fixes: #31286
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31927
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/31286
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This seems to be a leftover from the chromium project. Nothing uses
`#reverseMappingsBySourceURL`, so constructing it isn't necessary.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31512
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
These both have to do with extremely large numbers, so it's unlikely to
cause a problem in practice. Still, correctness.
First, encoding `-2147483648` in VLQ returns the value `"B"`. When
decoding, we get the value `1` after reading the base64. We then check
if the first bit is set (it is) to see if we should negate it, then we
shift all bits right once. Now, `value` will be `0` and `negate` will
be `true`. So, we'd return `-0`. Which is a bug! `-0` isn't
`-2147483648`, and we've broken a round trip.
Second, encoding any number with the 31st bit set, we'd return the
opposite sign. Let's use `1073741824`. Encoding, we get `"ggggggC"`.
When decoding, we get the value `-2147483648` after reading the base64.
Notice, it's already negative (the 32nd bit is set, because the 31st was
set and we shifted everything left once). We'd then check the first bit
(it's not) and shift right. But we used `>>`, which does not shift the
sign bit. We actually wanted `>>>`, which will. Because of that bug, we
get back `-1073741824` instead of the positive `1073741824`. It's even
worse if the 32nd and 31st bits are set, `-1610612736` becomes
`536870912` after a round trip.
I recently fixed the same two bugs in Closure Compiler:
https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/commit/584418eb
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31490
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31132
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/29564
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
