Original commit message:
[coverage] remove the last continuation range before synthetic return
Rather than only removing the continuation range for the last return
statement prior to a synthetic return statement, remove the
continuation tracking for whatever statement occurs prior to the
synthetic return.
Bug: v8:10628
Change-Id: Ieb8e393479c9811cf1b9756840bbfdbe7f44a1b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2280585
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Coe <bencoe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68719}
Refs: 2d5017a0fc
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34272
Refs: https://github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/229
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Original commit message:
[coverage] Fix coverage with default arguments
In the presence of default arguments, the body of the function gets
wrapped into another block. This caused our trailing-range-after-return
optimization to not apply, because the wrapper block had no source
range assigned. This CL correctly assignes a source range to that block,
which allows already present code to handle it correctly.
Note that this is not a real coverage bug; we've just been reporting
whitespace as uncovered. We're fixing it for consistency.
Originally reported on github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/66
Bug: v8:9952
Change-Id: Iab3905f558eb99126e0dad8072d03d0a312fdcd3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1903430
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64836}
Refs: 0dfd9ea512
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30713
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
