Commit Graph

170 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Gleixner
606424bf4f timekeeping: Add minimal posix-timers support for auxiliary clocks
Provide clock_getres(2) and clock_gettime(2) for auxiliary clocks.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625183757.932220594@linutronix.de
2025-06-27 20:13:12 +02:00
Eric Dumazet
0df6db767a posix-timers: Initialize cache early and move pointer into __timer_data
Move posix_timers_cache initialization to posixtimer_init(). At that point
the memory subsystem is already up and running.

Also move the cache pointer to the __timer_data variable to avoid
potential false sharing, since it never was marked as __ro_after_init.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250402133114.253901-1-edumazet@google.com
2025-04-09 21:21:36 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
a50b4fe095 A treewide hrtimer timer cleanup
hrtimers are initialized with hrtimer_init() and a subsequent store to
   the callback pointer. This turned out to be suboptimal for the upcoming
   Rust integration and is obviously a silly implementation to begin with.
 
   This cleanup replaces the hrtimer_init(T); T->function = cb; sequence
   with hrtimer_setup(T, cb);
 
   The conversion was done with Coccinelle and a few manual fixups.
 
   Once the conversion has completely landed in mainline, hrtimer_init()
   will be removed and the hrtimer::function becomes a private member.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAmff5jQTHHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYoVvRD/wKtuwmiA66NJFgXC0qVq82A6fO3bY8
 GBdbfysDJIbqGu5PTcULTbJ8qkqv3jeLUv6CcXvS4sZ7y/uJQl2lzf8yrD/0bbwc
 rLI6sHiPSZmK93kNVN4X5H7kvt7cE/DYC9nnEOgK3BY5FgKc4n9887d4aVBhL8Lv
 ODwVXvZ+xi351YCj7qRyPU24zt/p4tkkT1o2k4a0HBluqLI0D+V20fke9IERUL8r
 d1uWKlcn0TqYDesE8HXKIhbst3gx52rMJrXBJDHwFmG6v8Pj1fkTXCVpPo8QcBz8
 OTVkpomN9f/Tx4+GZwhZOF86LhLL3OhxD6pT7JhFCXdmSGv+Ez8uyk1YZysM/XpV
 Juy/1yAcBpDIDkmhMFGdAAn48Nn9Fotty0r4je60zSEp1d/4QMXcFme29qr2JTUE
 iWnQ/HD6DxUjVHqy7CYvvo26Xegg1C7qgyOVt4PYZwAM1VKF5P3kzYTb4SAdxtop
 Tpji1sfW9QV08jqMNo6XntD32DSP9S2HqjO9LwBw700jnx2jjJ35fcJs6iodMOUn
 gckIZLMn3L0OoglPdyA5O7SNTbKE7aFiRKdnT/cJtR3Fa39Qu27CwC5gfiyuie9I
 Q+LG8GLuYSBHXAR+PBK4GWlzJ7Dn8k3eqmbnLeKpRMsU6ZzcttgA64xhaviN2wN0
 iJbvLJeisXr3GA==
 =bYAX
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'timers-cleanups-2025-03-23' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull timer cleanups from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A treewide hrtimer timer cleanup

  hrtimers are initialized with hrtimer_init() and a subsequent store to
  the callback pointer. This turned out to be suboptimal for the
  upcoming Rust integration and is obviously a silly implementation to
  begin with.

  This cleanup replaces the hrtimer_init(T); T->function = cb; sequence
  with hrtimer_setup(T, cb);

  The conversion was done with Coccinelle and a few manual fixups.

  Once the conversion has completely landed in mainline, hrtimer_init()
  will be removed and the hrtimer::function becomes a private member"

* tag 'timers-cleanups-2025-03-23' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (100 commits)
  wifi: rt2x00: Switch to use hrtimer_update_function()
  io_uring: Use helper function hrtimer_update_function()
  serial: xilinx_uartps: Use helper function hrtimer_update_function()
  ASoC: fsl: imx-pcm-fiq: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  RDMA: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  virtio: mem: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/vmwgfx: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/xe/oa: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/vkms: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/msm: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/request: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/uncore: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/pmu: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/perf: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/gvt: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/i915/huc: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  drm/amdgpu: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  stm class: heartbeat: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  i2c: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  iio: Switch to use hrtimer_setup()
  ...
2025-03-25 10:54:15 -07:00
Cyrill Gorcunov
d1c3a3f1c9 posix-timers: Drop redundant memset() invocation
Initially in commit 6891c4509c memset() was required to clear a variable
allocated on stack. Commit 2482097c6c removed the on stack variable and
retained the memset() despite the fact that the memory is allocated via
kmem_cache_zalloc() and therefore zereoed already.

Drop the redundant memset().

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z9ctVxwaYOV4A2g4@grain
2025-03-17 10:38:49 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
ec2d0c0462 posix-timers: Provide a mechanism to allocate a given timer ID
Checkpoint/Restore in Userspace (CRIU) requires to reconstruct posix timers
with the same timer ID on restore. It uses sys_timer_create() and relies on
the monotonic increasing timer ID provided by this syscall. It creates and
deletes timers until the desired ID is reached. This is can loop for a long
time, when the checkpointed process had a very sparse timer ID range.

It has been debated to implement a new syscall to allow the creation of
timers with a given timer ID, but that's tideous due to the 32/64bit compat
issues of sigevent_t and of dubious value.

The restore mechanism of CRIU creates the timers in a state where all
threads of the restored process are held on a barrier and cannot issue
syscalls. That means the restorer task has exclusive control.

This allows to address this issue with a prctl() so that the restorer
thread can do:

   if (prctl(PR_TIMER_CREATE_RESTORE_IDS, PR_TIMER_CREATE_RESTORE_IDS_ON))
      goto linear_mode;
   create_timers_with_explicit_ids();
   prctl(PR_TIMER_CREATE_RESTORE_IDS, PR_TIMER_CREATE_RESTORE_IDS_OFF);
   
This is backwards compatible because the prctl() fails on older kernels and
CRIU can fall back to the linear timer ID mechanism. CRIU versions which do
not know about the prctl() just work as before.

Implement the prctl() and modify timer_create() so that it copies the
requested timer ID from userspace by utilizing the existing timer_t
pointer, which is used to copy out the allocated timer ID on success.

If the prctl() is disabled, which it is by default, timer_create() works as
before and does not try to read from the userspace pointer.

There is no problem when a broken or rogue user space application enables
the prctl(). If the user space pointer does not contain a valid ID, then
timer_create() fails. If the data is not initialized, but constains a
random valid ID, timer_create() will create that random timer ID or fail if
the ID is already given out. 
 
As CRIU must use the raw syscall to avoid manipulating the internal state
of the restored process, this has no library dependencies and can be
adopted by CRIU right away.

Recreating two timers with IDs 1000000 and 2000000 takes 1.5 seconds with
the create/delete method. With the prctl() it takes 3 microseconds.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87jz8vz0en.ffs@tglx
2025-03-13 12:07:18 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
451898ea42 posix-timers: Make per process list RCU safe
Preparatory change to remove the sighand locking from the /proc/$PID/timers
iterator.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.403223080@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:18 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
5fa75a432f posix-timers: Avoid false cacheline sharing
struct k_itimer has the hlist_node, which is used for lookup in the hash
bucket, and the timer lock in the same cache line.

That's obviously bad, if one CPU fiddles with a timer and the other is
walking the hash bucket on which that timer is queued.

Avoid this by restructuring struct k_itimer, so that the read mostly (only
modified during setup and teardown) fields are in the first cache line and
the lock and the rest of the fields which get written to are in cacheline
2-N.

Reduces cacheline contention in a test case of 64 processes creating and
accessing 20000 timers each by almost 30% according to perf.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.341108067@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:18 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
781764e0b4 posix-timers: Switch to jhash32()
The hash distribution of hash_32() is suboptimal. jhash32() provides a way
better distribution, which evens out the length of the hash bucket lists,
which in turn avoids large outliers in list walk times.

Due to the sparse ID space (thanks CRIU) there is no guarantee that the
timers will be fully evenly distributed over the hash buckets, but the
behaviour is way better than with hash_32() even for randomly sparse ID
spaces.

For a pathological test case with 64 processes creating and accessing
20000 timers each, this results in a runtime reduction of ~10% and a
significantly reduced runtime variation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.279080328@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
1535cb8028 posix-timers: Improve hash table performance
Eric and Ben reported a significant performance bottleneck on the global
hash, which is used to store posix timers for lookup.

Eric tried to do a lockless validation of a new timer ID before trying to
insert the timer, but that does not solve the problem.

For the non-contended case this is a pointless exercise and for the
contended case this extra lookup just creates enough interleaving that all
tasks can make progress.

There are actually two real solutions to the problem:

  1) Provide a per process (signal struct) xarray storage

  2) Implement a smarter hash like the one in the futex code

#1 works perfectly fine for most cases, but the fact that CRIU enforced a
   linear increasing timer ID to restore timers makes this problematic.

   It's easy enough to create a sparse timer ID space, which amounts very
   fast to a large junk of memory consumed for the xarray. 2048 timers with
   a ID offset of 512 consume more than one megabyte of memory for the
   xarray storage.

#2 The main advantage of the futex hash is that it uses per hash bucket
   locks instead of a global hash lock. Aside of that it is scaled
   according to the number of CPUs at boot time.

Experiments with artifical benchmarks have shown that a scaled hash with
per bucket locks comes pretty close to the xarray performance and in some
scenarios it performes better.

Test 1:

     A single process creates 20000 timers and afterwards invokes
     timer_getoverrun(2) on each of them:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
create         23 ms       23 ms      9 ms     8 ms
getoverrun     14 ms       14 ms      5 ms     4 ms

Test 2:

     A single process creates 50000 timers and afterwards invokes
     timer_getoverrun(2) on each of them:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
create         98 ms      219 ms     20 ms    18 ms
getoverrun     62 ms       62 ms     10 ms     9 ms

Test 3:

     A single process creates 100000 timers and afterwards invokes
     timer_getoverrun(2) on each of them:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
create        313 ms      750 ms     48 ms    33 ms
getoverrun    261 ms      260 ms     20 ms    14 ms

Erics changes create quite some overhead in the create() path due to the
double list walk, as the main issue according to perf is the list walk
itself. With 100k timers each hash bucket contains ~200 timers, which in
the worst case need to be all inspected. The same problem applies for
getoverrun() where the lookup has to walk through the hash buckets to find
the timer it is looking for.

The scaled hash obviously reduces hash collisions and lock contention
significantly. This becomes more prominent with concurrency.

Test 4:

     A process creates 63 threads and all threads wait on a barrier before
     each instance creates 20000 timers and afterwards invokes
     timer_getoverrun(2) on each of them. The threads are pinned on
     seperate CPUs to achive maximum concurrency. The numbers are the
     average times per thread:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
create     180239 ms    38599 ms    579 ms   813 ms
getoverrun   2645 ms     2642 ms     32 ms     7 ms

Test 5:

     A process forks 63 times and all forks wait on a barrier before each
     instance creates 20000 timers and afterwards invokes
     timer_getoverrun(2) on each of them. The processes are pinned on
     seperate CPUs to achive maximum concurrency. The numbers are the
     average times per process:

            mainline        eric   newhash   xarray
create     157253 ms    40008 ms     83 ms    60 ms
getoverrun   2611 ms     2614 ms     40 ms     4 ms

So clearly the reduction of lock contention with Eric's changes makes a
significant difference for the create() loop, but it does not mitigate the
problem of long list walks, which is clearly visible on the getoverrun()
side because that is purely dominated by the lookup itself. Once the timer
is found, the syscall just reads from the timer structure with no other
locks or code paths involved and returns.

The reason for the difference between the thread and the fork case for the
new hash and the xarray is that both suffer from contention on
sighand::siglock and the xarray suffers additionally from contention on the
xarray lock on insertion.

The only case where the reworked hash slighly outperforms the xarray is a
tight loop which creates and deletes timers.

Test 4:

     A process creates 63 threads and all threads wait on a barrier before
     each instance runs a loop which creates and deletes a timer 100000
     times in a row. The threads are pinned on seperate CPUs to achive
     maximum concurrency. The numbers are the average times per thread:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
loop	    5917  ms	 5897 ms   5473 ms  7846 ms

Test 5:

     A process forks 63 times and all forks wait on a barrier before each
     each instance runs a loop which creates and deletes a timer 100000
     times in a row. The processes are pinned on seperate CPUs to achive
     maximum concurrency. The numbers are the average times per process:

            mainline        Eric   newhash   xarray
loop	     5137 ms	 7828 ms    891 ms   872 ms

In both test there is not much contention on the hash, but the ucount
accounting for the signal and in the thread case the sighand::siglock
contention (plus the xarray locking) contribute dominantly to the overhead.

As the memory consumption of the xarray in the sparse ID case is
significant, the scaled hash with per bucket locks seems to be the better
overall option. While the xarray has faster lookup times for a large number
of timers, the actual syscall usage, which requires the lookup is not an
extreme hotpath. Most applications utilize signal delivery and all syscalls
except timer_getoverrun(2) are all but cheap.

So implement a scaled hash with per bucket locks, which offers the best
tradeoff between performance and memory consumption.

Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.216091571@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Eric Dumazet
feb864ee99 posix-timers: Make signal_struct:: Next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t
The global hash_lock protecting the posix timer hash table can be heavily
contended especially when there is an extensive linear search for a timer
ID.

Timer IDs are handed out by monotonically increasing next_posix_timer_id
and then validating that there is no timer with the same ID in the hash
table. Both operations happen with the global hash lock held.

To reduce the hash lock contention the hash will be reworked to a scaled
hash with per bucket locks, which requires to handle the ID counter
lockless.

Prepare for this by making next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t, which can be
used lockless with atomic_inc_return().

[ tglx: Adopted from Eric's series, massaged change log and simplified it ]

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250219125522.2535263-2-edumazet@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.151545978@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra
538d710ec7 posix-timers: Make lock_timer() use guard()
The lookup and locking of posix timers requires the same repeating pattern
at all usage sites:

   tmr = lock_timer(tiner_id);
   if (!tmr)
   	return -EINVAL;
   ....
   unlock_timer(tmr);

Solve this with a guard implementation, which works in most places out of
the box except for those, which need to unlock the timer inside the guard
scope.

Though the only places where this matters are timer_delete() and
timer_settime(). In both cases the timer pointer needs to be preserved
across the end of the scope, which is solved by storing the pointer in a
variable outside of the scope.

timer_settime() also has to protect the timer with RCU before unlocking,
which obviously can't use guard(rcu) before leaving the guard scope as that
guard is cleaned up before the unlock. Solve this by providing the RCU
protection open coded.

[ tglx: Made it work and added change log ]

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224162103.GD11590@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155624.087465658@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
1d25bdd3f3 posix-timers: Rework timer removal
sys_timer_delete() and the do_exit() cleanup function itimer_delete() are
doing the same thing, but have needlessly different implementations instead
of sharing the code.

The other oddity of timer deletion is the fact that the timer is not
invalidated before the actual deletion happens, which allows concurrent
lookups to succeed.

That's wrong because a timer which is in the process of being deleted
should not be visible and any actions like signal queueing, delivery and
rearming should not happen once the task, which invoked timer_delete(), has
the timer locked.

Rework the code so that:

   1) The signal queueing and delivery code ignore timers which are marked
      invalid

   2) The deletion implementation between sys_timer_delete() and
      itimer_delete() is shared

   3) The timer is invalidated and removed from the linked lists before
      the deletion callback of the relevant clock is invoked.

      That requires to rework timer_wait_running() as it does a lookup of
      the timer when relocking it at the end. In case of deletion this
      lookup would fail due to the preceding invalidation and the wait loop
      would terminate prematurely.

      But due to the preceding invalidation the timer cannot be accessed by
      other tasks anymore, so there is no way that the timer has been freed
      after the timer lock has been dropped.

      Move the re-validation out of timer_wait_running() and handle it at
      the only other usage site, timer_settime().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87zfht1exf.ffs@tglx
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
50f53b23f1 posix-timers: Simplify lock/unlock_timer()
Since the integration of sigqueue into the timer struct, lock_timer() is
only used in task context. So taking the lock with irqsave() is not longer
required.

Convert it to use spin_[un]lock_irq().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.959825668@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
a31a300c4d posix-timers: Use guards in a few places
Switch locking and RCU to guards where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.892762130@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:17 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
f6d0c3d2eb posix-timers: Remove SLAB_PANIC from kmem cache
There is no need to panic when the posix-timer kmem_cache can't be
created. timer_create() will fail with -ENOMEM and that's it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.829215801@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
4c5cd058be posix-timers: Remove a few paranoid warnings
Warnings about a non-initialized timer or non-existing callbacks are just
useful for implementing new posix clocks, but there a NULL pointer
dereference is expected anyway. :)

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.765462334@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
6ad9c3380a posix-timers: Cleanup includes
Remove pointless includes and sort the remaining ones alphabetically.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.701301552@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Eric Dumazet
5f2909c6cd posix-timers: Add cond_resched() to posix_timer_add() search loop
With a large number of POSIX timers the search for a valid ID might cause a
soft lockup on PREEMPT_NONE/VOLUNTARY kernels.

Add cond_resched() to the loop to prevent that.

[ tglx: Split out from Eric's series ]

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250214135911.2037402-2-edumazet@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.635612865@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Eric Dumazet
45ece9933d posix-timers: Initialise timer before adding it to the hash table
A timer is only valid in the hashtable when both timer::it_signal and
timer::it_id are set to their final values, but timers are added without
those values being set.

The timer ID is allocated when the timer is added to the hash in invalid
state. The ID is taken from a monotonically increasing per process counter
which wraps around after reaching INT_MAX. The hash insertion validates
that there is no timer with the allocated ID in the hash table which
belongs to the same process. That opens a mostly theoretical race condition:

If other threads of the same process manage to create/delete timers in
rapid succession before the newly created timer is fully initialized and
wrap around to the timer ID which was handed out, then a duplicate timer ID
will be inserted into the hash table.

Prevent this by:

  1) Setting timer::it_id before inserting the timer into the hashtable.
 
  2) Storing the signal pointer in timer::it_signal with bit 0 set before
     inserting it into the hashtable.

     Bit 0 acts as a invalid bit, which means that the regular lookup for
     sys_timer_*() will fail the comparison with the signal pointer.

     But the lookup on insertion masks out bit 0 and can therefore detect a
     timer which is not yet valid, but allocated in the hash table.  Bit 0
     in the pointer is cleared once the initialization of the timer
     completed.

[ tglx: Fold ID and signal iniitializaion into one patch and massage change
  	log and comments. ]

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250219125522.2535263-3-edumazet@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.572035178@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
2389c6efd3 posix-timers: Ensure that timer initialization is fully visible
Frederic pointed out that the memory operations to initialize the timer are
not guaranteed to be visible, when __lock_timer() observes timer::it_signal
valid under timer::it_lock:

  T0                                      T1
  ---------                               -----------
  do_timer_create()
      // A
      new_timer->.... = ....
      spin_lock(current->sighand)
      // B
      WRITE_ONCE(new_timer->it_signal, current->signal)
      spin_unlock(current->sighand)
					sys_timer_*()
					   t =  __lock_timer()
						  spin_lock(&timr->it_lock)
						  // observes B
						  if (timr->it_signal == current->signal)
						    return timr;
			                   if (!t)
					       return;
					// Is not guaranteed to observe A

Protect the write of timer::it_signal, which makes the timer valid, with
timer::it_lock as well. This guarantees that T1 must observe the
initialization A completely, when it observes the valid signal pointer
under timer::it_lock. sighand::siglock must still be taken to protect the
signal::posix_timers list.

Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308155623.507944489@linutronix.de
2025-03-13 12:07:16 +01:00
Nam Cao
f66b0acf39 time: Switch to hrtimer_setup()
hrtimer_setup() takes the callback function pointer as argument and
initializes the timer completely.

Replace hrtimer_init() and the open coded initialization of
hrtimer::function with the new setup mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170bb691a0d59917c8268a98c80b607128fc9f7f.1738746821.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2025-02-18 10:32:33 +01:00
Benjamin Segall
f99c5bb396 posix-timers: Invoke cond_resched() during exit_itimers()
exit_itimers() loops through every timer in the process to delete it.  This
requires taking the system-wide hash_lock for each of these timers, and
contends with other processes trying to create or delete timers.

When a process creates hundreds of thousands of timers, and then exits
while other processes contend with it, this can trigger softlockups on
CONFIG_PREEMPT=n.

Add a cond_resched() invocation into the loop to allow the system to make
progress.

Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/xm2634gg2n23.fsf@google.com
2025-02-18 10:12:49 +01:00
Zhu Jun
9f38e83a88 posix-timers: Fix typo in __lock_timer()
The word 'accross' is wrong, so fix it.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241204080907.11989-1-zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com
2025-01-15 19:49:13 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
7a66f72b09 posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are
rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and
self rearm them is not longer required.

Remove the relevant hacks and the not longer required return values from
the related functions. The alarm timer workarounds will be cleaned up in a
separate step.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.187239060@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:45 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
df7a996b4d signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list
Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list:

   1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set

   2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal
      is already queued

This only happens when the signal is for a valid timer, which delivered the
signal in periodic mode. One-shot timer signals are correctly dropped.

Due to the lock order constraints (sighand::siglock nests inside
timer::lock) the signal code cannot access any of the timer fields which
are relevant to make this decision, e.g. timer::it_status.

This is addressed by establishing a protection scheme which requires to
lock both locks on the timer side for modifying decision fields in the
timer struct and therefore makes it possible for the signal delivery to
evaluate with only sighand:siglock being held:

  1) Move the NULLification of timer->it_signal into the sighand::siglock
     protected section of timer_delete() and check timer::it_signal in the
     code path which determines whether the signal is dropped or queued on
     the ignore list.

     This ensures that a deleted timer cannot be moved onto the ignore
     list, which would prevent it from being freed on exit() as it is not
     longer in the process' posix timer list.

     If the timer got moved to the ignored list before deletion then it is
     removed from the ignored list under sighand lock in timer_delete().

  2) Provide a new timer::it_sig_periodic flag, which gets set in the
     signal queue path with both timer and sighand locks held if the timer
     is actually in periodic mode at expiry time.

     The ignore list code checks this flag under sighand::siglock and drops
     the signal when it is not set.

     If it is set, then the signal is moved to the ignored list independent
     of the actual state of the timer.

     When the signal is un-ignored later then the signal is moved back to
     the signal queue. On signal delivery the posix timer side decides
     about dropping the signal if the timer was re-armed, dis-armed or
     deleted based on the signal sequence counter check.

     If the thread/process exits then not yet delivered signals are
     discarded which means the reference of the timer containing the
     sigqueue is dropped and frees the timer.

     This is way cheaper than requiring all code paths to lock
     sighand::siglock of the target thread/process on any modification of
     timer::it_status or going all the way and removing pending signals
     from the signal queues on every rearm, disarm or delete operation.

So the protection scheme here is that on the timer side both timer::lock
and sighand::siglock have to be held for modifying

   timer::it_signal
   timer::it_sig_periodic

which means that on the signal side holding sighand::siglock is enough to
evaluate these fields.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
In posixtimer_deliver_signal() holding timer::lock is sufficient to do the
sequence validation against timer::it_signal_seq because a concurrent
expiry is waiting on timer::lock to be released.

This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self
rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.120756416@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:45 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
0e20cd33ac posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit
To handle posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly, the timers
will be queued on a separate ignored list.

Add the necessary cleanup code for timer_delete() and exit_itimers().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.987530588@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:45 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
647da5f709 posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer
The posix timer signal handling uses siginfo::si_sys_private for handling
the sequence counter check. That indirection is not longer required and the
sequence count value at signal queueing time can be stored in struct
k_itimer itself.

This removes the requirement of treating siginfo::si_sys_private special as
it's now always zero as the kernel does not touch it anymore.

Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.852619866@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:45 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
6017a158be posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.

Now that the prerequisites are in place, embed the sigqueue into struct
k_itimer and fixup the relevant usage sites.

Aside of preparing for proper SIG_IGN handling, this spares an extra
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.719695194@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:44 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
11629b9808 signal: Replace resched_timer logic
In preparation for handling ignored posix timer signals correctly and
embedding the sigqueue struct into struct k_itimer, hand down a pointer to
the sigqueue struct into posix_timer_deliver_signal() instead of just
having a boolean flag.

No functional change.

Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.652658158@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:44 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
0360ed14d9 signal: Refactor send_sigqueue()
To handle posix timers which have their signal ignored via SIG_IGN properly
it is required to requeue a ignored signal for delivery when SIG_IGN is
lifted so the timer gets rearmed.

Split the required code out of send_sigqueue() so it can be reused in
context of sigaction().

While at it rename send_sigqueue() to posixtimer_send_sigqueue() so its
clear what this is about.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.586453412@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:44 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
ef1c5bcd6d posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer
instead of re-evaluating the signal delivery mode everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.519086500@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:44 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
5d916a0988 posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated
sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time
races of all sorts.

To make that work correctly it needs reference counting so that timer
deletion does not free the timer prematuraly when there is a signal queued
or delivered concurrently.

Add a rcuref to the posix timer part.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.304756440@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:43 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
b06b0345ff posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
i.e. 0.

Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun
value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself
relative to the expiry time.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.106738193@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:43 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
513793bc6a posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent
Signals of timers which are reprogammed, disarmed or deleted can deliver
signals related to the past. The POSIX spec is blury about this:

 - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
    notifications is unspecified."

 - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
    unspecified."

In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
been disarmed. This makes the behaviour consistent and understandable.

Remove the si_sys_private check from the signal delivery code and invoke
posix_timer_deliver_signal() unconditionally for posix timer related
signals.

Change posix_timer_deliver_signal() so it controls the actual signal
delivery via the return value. It now instructs the signal code to drop the
signal when:

  1) The timer does not longer exist in the hash table

  2) The timer signal_seq value is not the same as the si_sys_private value
     which was set when the signal was queued.

This is also a preparatory change to embed the sigqueue into the k_itimer
structure, which in turn allows to remove the si_sys_private magic.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.040348644@linutronix.de
2024-11-07 02:14:43 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
1550dde8a5 posix-timers: Add proper state tracking
Right now the state tracking is done by two struct members:

 - it_active:
     A boolean which tracks armed/disarmed state

 - it_signal_seq:
     A sequence counter which is used to invalidate settings
     and prevent rearming

Replace it_active with it_status and keep properly track about the states
in one place.

This allows to reuse it_signal_seq to track reprogramming, disarm and
delete operations in order to drop signals which are related to the state
previous of those operations.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.670337048@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
cd1e93aeda posix-timers: Rename k_itimer:: It_requeue_pending
Prepare for using this struct member to do a proper reprogramming and
deletion accounting so that stale signals can be dropped.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.611997737@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
2860d4d315 posix-timers: Drop signal if timer has been deleted or reprogrammed
No point in delivering a signal from the past. POSIX does not specify the
behaviour here:

 - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
    notifications is unspecified."

 - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is unspecified."

In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
been disarmed.

Drop the signal as that is conistent and understandable behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.553646280@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
c775ea28d4 signal: Allow POSIX timer signals to be dropped
In case that a timer was reprogrammed or deleted an already pending signal
is obsolete. Right now such signals are kept around and eventually
delivered. While POSIX is blury about this:

 - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
    notifications is unspecified."

 - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
    unspecified."

it is reasonable in both cases to expect that pending signals are discarded
as they have no meaning anymore.

Prepare the signal code to allow dropping posix timer signals.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.494416923@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
4febce44cf posix-timers: Cure si_sys_private race
The si_sys_private member of the siginfo which is embedded in the
preallocated sigqueue is used by the posix timer code to decide whether a
timer must be reprogrammed on signal delivery.

The handling of this is racy as a long standing comment in that code
documents. It is modified with the timer lock held, but without sighand
lock being held. The actual signal delivery code checks for it under
sighand lock without holding the timer lock.

Hand the new value to send_sigqueue() as argument and store it with sighand
lock held. This is an intermediate change to address this issue.

The arguments to this function will be cleanup in subsequent changes.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.434338954@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:18 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
68f99be287 signal: Confine POSIX_TIMERS properly
Move the itimer rearming out of the signal code and consolidate all posix
timer related functions in the signal code under one ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.314100569@linutronix.de
2024-10-29 11:43:18 +01:00
Julia Lawall
2e529e637c posix-timers: Replace call_rcu() by kfree_rcu() for simple kmem_cache_free() callback
Since SLOB was removed and since commit 6c6c47b063 ("mm, slab: call
kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy()"), it is not longer
necessary to use call_rcu() when the callback only performs
kmem_cache_free(). Use kfree_rcu() directly.

The changes were made using Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241013201704.49576-12-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
2024-10-24 11:22:54 +02:00
Anna-Maria Behnsen
bd7c8ff9fe treewide: Fix wrong singular form of jiffies in comments
There are several comments all over the place, which uses a wrong singular
form of jiffies.

Replace 'jiffie' by 'jiffy'. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> # m68k
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240904-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v1-3-e98760256370@linutronix.de
2024-09-08 20:47:40 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
566e2d8253 posix-timers: Consolidate signal queueing
Rename posix_timer_event() to posix_timer_queue_signal() as this is what
the function is about.

Consolidate the requeue pending and deactivation updates into that function
as there is no point in doing this in all incarnations of posix timers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29 21:57:35 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
20f13385b5 posix-timers: Consolidate timer setup
hrtimer based and CPU timers have their own way to install the new interval
and to reset overrun and signal handling related data.

Create a helper function and do the same operation for all variants.

This also makes the handling of the interval consistent. It's only stored
when the timer is actually armed, i.e. timer->it_value != 0. Before that it
was stored unconditionally for posix CPU timers and conditionally for the
other posix timers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29 21:57:35 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
52dea0a15c posix-timers: Convert timer list to hlist
No requirement for a real list. Spare a few bytes.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29 21:57:35 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
aca1dc0ce1 posix-timers: Clear overrun in common_timer_set()
Keeping the overrun count of the previous setup around is just wrong. The
new setting has nothing to do with the previous one and has to start from a
clean slate.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29 21:57:35 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
bfa408f03f posix-timers: Retrieve interval in common timer_settime() code
No point in doing this all over the place.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29 21:57:35 +02:00
Lukas Bulwahn
b9a40f24d8 posix-timers: Refer properly to CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
Commit c78f261e5dcb ("posix-timers: Clarify posix_timer_fn() comments")
turns an ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS into an conditional on
"IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHRES_TIMERS)"; note that the new conditional refers
to "HIGHRES_TIMERS" not "HIGH_RES_TIMERS" as before.

Fix this typo introduced in that refactoring.

Fixes: c78f261e5dcb ("posix-timers: Clarify posix_timer_fn() comments")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609094643.26253-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
2023-06-18 22:41:53 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
b96ce4931f posix-timers: Polish coding style in a few places
Make it consistent with the TIP tree documentation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230425183313.888493625@linutronix.de
2023-06-18 22:41:53 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
200dbd6d14 posix-timers: Remove pointless comments
Documenting the obvious is just consuming space for no value.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230425183313.832240451@linutronix.de
2023-06-18 22:41:52 +02:00