SMN access was bolted into amd_nb mostly as convenience. This has
limitations though that require incurring tech debt to keep it working.
Move SMN access to the newly introduced AMD Node driver.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> # pdx86
Acked-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> # PMF, PMC
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206161210.163701-11-yazen.ghannam@amd.com
Use platform_get_resource() to fetch the memory resource instead of
acpi_walk_resources() and devm_ioremap_resource() for mapping the
resources.
PS: We cannot use resource_size() here because it adds an extra byte to
round off the size. In the case of PMF ResourceTemplate(), this rounding
is already handled within the _CRS. Using resource_size() would increase
the resource size by 1, causing a mismatch with the length field and
leading to issues. Therefore, simply use end-start of the ACPI resource to
obtain the actual length.
Co-developed-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104054829.620858-4-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
[ij: added a cast to resource_size_t printing]
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
AMD SFH driver has APIs defined to export the human presence information;
use this within the PMF driver to send inputs to the PMF TA, so that PMF
driver can enact to the actions coming from the TA.
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123141458.3715211-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
PMF Policy binary is a encrypted and signed binary that will be part
of the BIOS. PMF driver via the ACPI interface checks the existence
of Smart PC bit. If the advertised bit is found, PMF driver walks
the acpi namespace to find out the policy binary size and the address
which has to be passed to the TA during the TA init sequence.
The policy binary is comprised of inputs (or the events) and outputs
(or the actions). With the PMF ecosystem, OEMs generate the policy
binary (or could be multiple binaries) that contains a supported set
of inputs and outputs which could be specifically carved out for each
usage segment (or for each user also) that could influence the system
behavior either by enriching the user experience or/and boost/throttle
power limits.
Once the TA init command succeeds, the PMF driver sends the changing
events in the current environment to the TA for a constant sampling
frequency time (the event here could be a lid close or open) and
if the policy binary has corresponding action built within it, the
TA sends the action for it in the subsequent enact command.
If the inputs sent to the TA has no output defined in the policy
binary generated by OEMs, there will be no action to be performed
by the PMF driver.
Example policies:
1) if slider is performance ; set the SPL to 40W
Here PMF driver registers with the platform profile interface and
when the slider position is changed, PMF driver lets the TA know
about this. TA sends back an action to update the Sustained
Power Limit (SPL). PMF driver updates this limit via the PMFW mailbox.
2) if user_away ; then lock the system
Here PMF driver hooks to the AMD SFH driver to know the user presence
and send the inputs to TA and if the condition is met, the TA sends
the action of locking the system. PMF driver generates a uevent and
based on the udev rule in the userland the system gets locked with
systemctl.
The intent here is to provide the OEM's to make a policy to lock the
system when the user is away ; but the userland can make a choice to
ignore it.
The OEMs will have an utility to create numerous such policies and
the policies shall be reviewed by AMD before signing and encrypting
them. Policies are shared between operating systems to have seemless user
experience.
Since all this action has to happen via the "amdtee" driver, currently
there is no caller for it in the kernel which can load the amdtee driver.
Without amdtee driver loading onto the system the "tee" calls shall fail
from the PMF driver. Hence an explicit MODULE_SOFTDEP has been added
to address this.
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212014705.2017474-5-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).
PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
/lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212014705.2017474-2-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
PMF driver maintains an internal config store for each PMF feature
after the feature init happens. Having a debug mechanism to triage
in-field issues w.r.t to mode switch not happening based on the OEM
fed values via the ACPI method to PMF driver is becoming the need of
the hour. Add support to get more ACPI debug spew guarded by a CONFIG.
Co-developed-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510144751.66601-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The current SMN index used for the driver probe seems to be meant
for the BIOS pair and there are potential concurrency problems that can
occur with an inopportune SMI.
It is been advised to use SMN_INDEX_0 instead of SMN_INDEX_2, which is
what amd_nb.c provides and this function has protections to ensure that
only one caller can use it at a time.
Fixes: da5ce22df5 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF core layer")
Co-developed-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406164807.50969-4-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
It is reported that amd_pmf driver is missing "depends on" for
CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY causing the following build error.
ld: drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.o: in function `amd_pmf_remove':
core.c:(.text+0x10): undefined reference to `power_supply_unreg_notifier'
ld: drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.o: in function `amd_pmf_probe':
core.c:(.text+0x38f): undefined reference to `power_supply_reg_notifier'
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:34: vmlinux] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:1248: vmlinux] Error 2
Add this to the Kconfig file.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217028
Fixes: c5258d39fc ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add helper routine to update SPS thermals")
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230213121457.1764463-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Its reported that amd-pmf driver when built with config which does not
have ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE set/enabled throws a undefined references to
symbols used.
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `amd_pmf_init_sps':
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:132: undefined reference to `platform_profile_register'
ld: vmlinux.o: in function `amd_pmf_deinit_sps':
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:142: undefined reference to `platform_profile_remove'
Fix it by adding a "select" to the Kconfig.
Fixes: da5ce22df5 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF core layer")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819083858.3987590-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
PMF core layer is meant to abstract the common functionalities
across PMF features. This layer also does the plumbing work
like setting up the mailbox channel for the communication
between the PMF driver and the PMFW (Power Management Firmware)
running on the SMU.
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220802151149.2123699-2-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
