Like commit 512660cd1f ("drm/xe/rtp: Expand max rules/actions per
entry") did, expand the maximum number of actions/rules. That commit was
too conservative, just incrementing 2. Other than the ugliness of these
macros and additional preprocessor steps when they are used, there are
no downsides on increasing the maximum: the tables in which they are
used use a sentinel to mark the last element.
With rtp processing now supporting OR rules, it's possible to migrate
the extension made for OOB WAs that "entries with name are OR'ed in
previous entry". For that the maximum number of rules needs to be
increased.
Just double it. Hopefully 12 is sufficient for longer than 6 was.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Having at most 4 rules per entry is already reaching the maximum.
Expand it to 6 to allow for more room. With the addition of OR
condition for rules, this will very soon not be sufficient.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240618050044.324454-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
To minimize the risk of future name collisions, rename macros to
always include the ARG or ARGS tag:
DROP_FIRST to DROP_FIRST_ARG
PICK_FIRST to FIRST_ARG
PICK_LAST to LAST_ARG
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> #v2
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240508171000.1864-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Remove almost all existing style issues of type SPACING reported
by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The macros to handle the RTP tables are very scary, but shouldn't be
used outside of the header adding the infra. Move it to a separate
header and make sure it's only included when it can be.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-11-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
