VF's drivers can't modify GGTT PTEs except the range explicitly
assigned by the PF driver. To allow hardware enforcement of this
requirement, each GGTT PTE has a field with the VF number that
identifies which VF can modify that particular GGTT PTE entry.
Only PF driver can modify this field and PF driver shall do that
before VF drivers will be loaded. Add function to prepare PTEs.
Since it will be used only by the PF driver, make it available
only for CONFIG_PCI_IOV=y.
Bspec: 45015, 52395
Reviewed-by: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240415173937.1287-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We already have dedicated header for GGTT/PPGTT definitions.
It's also cleaner to separate them from implementation macros.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240405123520.847-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
It's better to keep all hardware GGTT definitions separated from
the driver code. It also helps to avoid duplicated definitions.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240326131042.319-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
