mirror of
				https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson
				synced 2025-10-31 16:38:31 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	 992caacf11
			
		
	
	
		992caacf11
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			This patch fixes typos in various Documentation txts. The patch addresses some words starting with the letters 'N'-'P'. Signed-off-by: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			222 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			222 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
|      CPU frequency and voltage scaling code in the Linux(TM) kernel
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		         L i n u x    C P U F r e q
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		      C P U F r e q   G o v e r n o r s
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		   - information for users and developers -
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		    Dominik Brodowski  <linux@brodo.de>
 | |
|             some additions and corrections by Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Clock scaling allows you to change the clock speed of the CPUs on the
 | |
|     fly. This is a nice method to save battery power, because the lower
 | |
|             the clock speed, the less power the CPU consumes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Contents:
 | |
| ---------
 | |
| 1.   What is a CPUFreq Governor?
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.   Governors In the Linux Kernel
 | |
| 2.1  Performance
 | |
| 2.2  Powersave
 | |
| 2.3  Userspace
 | |
| 2.4  Ondemand
 | |
| 2.5  Conservative
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3.   The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. What Is A CPUFreq Governor?
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most cpufreq drivers (in fact, all except one, longrun) or even most
 | |
| cpu frequency scaling algorithms only offer the CPU to be set to one
 | |
| frequency. In order to offer dynamic frequency scaling, the cpufreq
 | |
| core must be able to tell these drivers of a "target frequency". So
 | |
| these specific drivers will be transformed to offer a "->target"
 | |
| call instead of the existing "->setpolicy" call. For "longrun", all
 | |
| stays the same, though.
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to decide what frequency within the CPUfreq policy should be used?
 | |
| That's done using "cpufreq governors". Two are already in this patch
 | |
| -- they're the already existing "powersave" and "performance" which
 | |
| set the frequency statically to the lowest or highest frequency,
 | |
| respectively. At least two more such governors will be ready for
 | |
| addition in the near future, but likely many more as there are various
 | |
| different theories and models about dynamic frequency scaling
 | |
| around. Using such a generic interface as cpufreq offers to scaling
 | |
| governors, these can be tested extensively, and the best one can be
 | |
| selected for each specific use.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Basically, it's the following flow graph:
 | |
| 
 | |
| CPU can be set to switch independently	 |	   CPU can only be set
 | |
|       within specific "limits"		 |       to specific frequencies
 | |
| 
 | |
|                                  "CPUfreq policy"
 | |
| 		consists of frequency limits (policy->{min,max})
 | |
|   		     and CPUfreq governor to be used
 | |
| 			 /		      \
 | |
| 			/		       \
 | |
| 		       /		       the cpufreq governor decides
 | |
| 		      /			       (dynamically or statically)
 | |
| 		     /			       what target_freq to set within
 | |
| 		    /			       the limits of policy->{min,max}
 | |
| 		   /			            \
 | |
| 		  /				     \
 | |
| 	Using the ->setpolicy call,		 Using the ->target call,
 | |
| 	    the limits and the			  the frequency closest
 | |
| 	     "policy" is set.			  to target_freq is set.
 | |
| 						  It is assured that it
 | |
| 						  is within policy->{min,max}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Governors In the Linux Kernel
 | |
| ================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.1 Performance
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor "performance" sets the CPU statically to the
 | |
| highest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
 | |
| scaling_max_freq.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.2 Powersave
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor "powersave" sets the CPU statically to the
 | |
| lowest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
 | |
| scaling_max_freq.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.3 Userspace
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor "userspace" allows the user, or any userspace
 | |
| program running with UID "root", to set the CPU to a specific frequency
 | |
| by making a sysfs file "scaling_setspeed" available in the CPU-device
 | |
| directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.4 Ondemand
 | |
| ------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor "ondemand" sets the CPU depending on the
 | |
| current usage. To do this the CPU must have the capability to
 | |
| switch the frequency very quickly.  There are a number of sysfs file
 | |
| accessible parameters:
 | |
| 
 | |
| sampling_rate: measured in uS (10^-6 seconds), this is how often you
 | |
| want the kernel to look at the CPU usage and to make decisions on
 | |
| what to do about the frequency.  Typically this is set to values of
 | |
| around '10000' or more.
 | |
| 
 | |
| show_sampling_rate_(min|max): the minimum and maximum sampling rates
 | |
| available that you may set 'sampling_rate' to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| up_threshold: defines what the average CPU usaged between the samplings
 | |
| of 'sampling_rate' needs to be for the kernel to make a decision on
 | |
| whether it should increase the frequency.  For example when it is set
 | |
| to its default value of '80' it means that between the checking
 | |
| intervals the CPU needs to be on average more than 80% in use to then
 | |
| decide that the CPU frequency needs to be increased.  
 | |
| 
 | |
| sampling_down_factor: this parameter controls the rate that the CPU
 | |
| makes a decision on when to decrease the frequency.  When set to its
 | |
| default value of '5' it means that at 1/5 the sampling_rate the kernel
 | |
| makes a decision to lower the frequency.  Five "lower rate" decisions
 | |
| have to be made in a row before the CPU frequency is actually lower.
 | |
| If set to '1' then the frequency decreases as quickly as it increases,
 | |
| if set to '2' it decreases at half the rate of the increase.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ignore_nice_load: this parameter takes a value of '0' or '1'. When
 | |
| set to '0' (its default), all processes are counted towards the
 | |
| 'cpu utilisation' value.  When set to '1', the processes that are
 | |
| run with a 'nice' value will not count (and thus be ignored) in the
 | |
| overall usage calculation.  This is useful if you are running a CPU
 | |
| intensive calculation on your laptop that you do not care how long it
 | |
| takes to complete as you can 'nice' it and prevent it from taking part
 | |
| in the deciding process of whether to increase your CPU frequency.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2.5 Conservative
 | |
| ----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor "conservative", much like the "ondemand"
 | |
| governor, sets the CPU depending on the current usage.  It differs in
 | |
| behaviour in that it gracefully increases and decreases the CPU speed
 | |
| rather than jumping to max speed the moment there is any load on the
 | |
| CPU.  This behaviour more suitable in a battery powered environment.
 | |
| The governor is tweaked in the same manner as the "ondemand" governor
 | |
| through sysfs with the addition of:
 | |
| 
 | |
| freq_step: this describes what percentage steps the cpu freq should be
 | |
| increased and decreased smoothly by.  By default the cpu frequency will
 | |
| increase in 5% chunks of your maximum cpu frequency.  You can change this
 | |
| value to anywhere between 0 and 100 where '0' will effectively lock your
 | |
| CPU at a speed regardless of its load whilst '100' will, in theory, make
 | |
| it behave identically to the "ondemand" governor.
 | |
| 
 | |
| down_threshold: same as the 'up_threshold' found for the "ondemand"
 | |
| governor but for the opposite direction.  For example when set to its
 | |
| default value of '20' it means that if the CPU usage needs to be below
 | |
| 20% between samples to have the frequency decreased.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
 | |
| =============================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| A new governor must register itself with the CPUfreq core using
 | |
| "cpufreq_register_governor". The struct cpufreq_governor, which has to
 | |
| be passed to that function, must contain the following values:
 | |
| 
 | |
| governor->name -	    A unique name for this governor
 | |
| governor->governor -	    The governor callback function
 | |
| governor->owner	-	    .THIS_MODULE for the governor module (if 
 | |
| 			    appropriate)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The governor->governor callback is called with the current (or to-be-set)
 | |
| cpufreq_policy struct for that CPU, and an unsigned int event. The
 | |
| following events are currently defined:
 | |
| 
 | |
| CPUFREQ_GOV_START:   This governor shall start its duty for the CPU
 | |
| 		     policy->cpu
 | |
| CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:    This governor shall end its duty for the CPU
 | |
| 		     policy->cpu
 | |
| CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:  The limits for CPU policy->cpu have changed to
 | |
| 		     policy->min and policy->max.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need other "events" externally of your driver, _only_ use the
 | |
| cpufreq_governor_l(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int event) call to the
 | |
| CPUfreq core to ensure proper locking.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| The CPUfreq governor may call the CPU processor driver using one of
 | |
| these two functions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 | |
|                                  unsigned int target_freq,
 | |
|                                  unsigned int relation);
 | |
| 
 | |
| int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 | |
|                                    unsigned int target_freq,
 | |
|                                    unsigned int relation);
 | |
| 
 | |
| target_freq must be within policy->min and policy->max, of course.
 | |
| What's the difference between these two functions? When your governor
 | |
| still is in a direct code path of a call to governor->governor, the
 | |
| per-CPU cpufreq lock is still held in the cpufreq core, and there's
 | |
| no need to lock it again (in fact, this would cause a deadlock). So
 | |
| use __cpufreq_driver_target only in these cases. In all other cases 
 | |
| (for example, when there's a "daemonized" function that wakes up 
 | |
| every second), use cpufreq_driver_target to lock the cpufreq per-CPU
 | |
| lock before the command is passed to the cpufreq processor driver.
 | |
| 
 |