mirror of
				https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson
				synced 2025-10-31 18:53:24 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	 5c2e2e239e
			
		
	
	
		5c2e2e239e
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			Given that there are no apparent calls to lock_kernel() or unlock_kernel() under net/ax25, delete the TODO reference related to that. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			21 lines
		
	
	
		
			772 B
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			21 lines
		
	
	
		
			772 B
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| Do the ax25_list_lock, ax25_dev_lock, linkfail_lockreally, ax25_frag_lock and
 | |
| listen_lock have to be bh-safe?
 | |
| 
 | |
| Do the netrom and rose locks have to be bh-safe?
 | |
| 
 | |
| A device might be deleted after lookup in the SIOCADDRT ioctl but before it's
 | |
| being used.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Routes to a device being taken down might be deleted by ax25_rt_device_down
 | |
| but added by somebody else before the device has been deleted fully.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ax25_rt_find_route synopsys is pervert but I somehow had to deal with
 | |
| the race caused by the static variable in it's previous implementation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Implement proper socket locking in netrom and rose.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Check socket locking when ax25_rcv is sending to raw sockets.  In particular
 | |
| ax25_send_to_raw() seems fishy.  Heck - ax25_rcv is fishy.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Handle XID and TEST frames properly.
 |