* for-next/feat_mte_store_only:
: MTE feature to restrict tag checking to store only operations
kselftest/arm64/mte: Add MTE_STORE_ONLY testcases
kselftest/arm64/mte: Preparation for mte store only test
kselftest/arm64/abi: Add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature hwcap test
KVM: arm64: Expose MTE_STORE_ONLY feature to guest
arm64/hwcaps: Add MTE_STORE_ONLY hwcaps
arm64/kernel: Support store-only mte tag check
prctl: Introduce PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY
arm64/cpufeature: Add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature
Some build environments for the selftests are not picking up the newly
added AT_HWCAP3 when using the libc headers, even with headers_install
(which we require already for the arm64 selftests). As a quick fix add
local definitions of the constant to tools use it, while auxvec.h is
installed with some toolchains it needs some persuasion to get picked up.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715-arm64-selftest-bodge-hwcap3-v1-1-541b54bc43bb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Since ARMv8.9, FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY can be used to restrict raise of tag
check fault on store operation only.
Adds new test cases using MTE_STORE_ONLY feature.
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250618092957.2069907-9-yeoreum.yun@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
While prctl() returns an 'int', the PR_MTE_TCF_MASK is defined as
unsigned long which results in the larger type following a bitwise 'and'
operation. Cast the printf() argument to 'int'.
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108134920.1233992-3-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The current tests use the prctls for various things but there's no
coverage of the edges of the interface so add some basics. This isn't
hugely useful as it is (it originally had some coverage for the
combinations with asymmetric mode but we removed the prctl() for that)
but it might be a helpful starting point for future work, for example
covering error handling.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419103243.24774-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
