Use KVM or HVF if supported by the QEMU binary and available on the
system.
This produces a nice improvement on my Apple M3 Pro running macOS 14.7:
Before:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec --arch arm64
[HH:MM:SS] Elapsed time: 10.145s
After:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec --arch arm64
[HH:MM:SS] Elapsed time: 1.773s
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
While it probably doesn't make a huge difference given the current KUnit
coverage we will get the best coverage of arm64 architecture features if
we specify -cpu=max rather than picking a specific CPU, this will include
all architecture features that qemu supports including many which have not
yet made it into physical implementations.
Due to performance issues emulating the architected pointer authentication
algorithm it is recommended to use the implementation defined algorithm
that qemu has instead, this should make no meaningful difference to the
coverage and will run the tests faster.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Note: this potentially breaks custom qemu_configs if people are using
them! But the fix for them is simple, don't specify multiple arguments
in one string and don't add on a redundant ''.
It feels a bit iffy to be using a shell in the first place.
There's the usual shenanigans where people could pass in arbitrary shell
commands via --kernel_arg (since we're just adding '' around the
kernel_cmdline) or via a custom qemu_config.
This isn't too much of a concern given the nature of this script (and
the qemu_config file is in python, you can do w/e you want already).
But it does have some other drawbacks.
One example of a kunit-specific pain point:
If the relevant qemu binary is missing, we get output like this:
> /bin/sh: line 1: qemu-system-aarch64: command not found
This in turn results in our KTAP parser complaining about
missing/invalid KTAP, but we don't directly show the error!
It's even more annoying to debug when you consider --raw_output only
shows KUnit output by default, i.e. you need --raw_output=all to see it.
Whereas directly invoking the binary, Python will raise a
FileNotFoundError for us, which is a noisier but more clear.
Making this change requires
* splitting parameters like ['-m 256'] into ['-m', '256'] in
kunit/qemu_configs/*.py
* change [''] to [] in kunit/qemu_configs/*.py since otherwise
QEMU fails w/ 'Device needs media, but drive is empty'
* dropping explicit quoting of the kernel cmdline
* using shlex.quote() when we print what command we're running
so the user can copy-paste and run it
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add basic support to run QEMU via kunit_tool. Add support for i386,
x86_64, arm, arm64, and a bunch more.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
