This is used in various selftests and will be handy when integrating
those with nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-nolibc-misc-v2-11-3c043eeab06c@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
This is used in various selftests and will be handy when integrating
those with nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-nolibc-misc-v2-9-3c043eeab06c@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
This is used in various selftests and will be handy when integrating
those with nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-nolibc-misc-v2-8-3c043eeab06c@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Inclusion of any nolibc header file should also bring all other headers.
On the other hand it should also be possible to include any nolibc header
files
in any order.
Currently this is implemented by including the catch-all nolibc.h after the
headers own definitions.
This is problematic if one nolibc header depends on another one.
The first header has to include the other one before defining any symbols.
That in turn will include the rest of nolibc while the current header has
not defined anything yet. If any other part of nolibc depends on
definitions from the current header, errors are encountered.
This is already the case today. Effectively nolibc can only be included in
the order of nolibc.h.
Restructure the way "nolibc.h" is included.
Move it to the beginning of the header files and before the include guards.
Now any header will behave exactly like "nolibc.h" while the include
guards prevent any duplicate definitions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-nolibc-header-check-v1-2-011576b6ed6f@linutronix.de
After the nolibc includes were split to facilitate portability from
standard libcs, programs that include only what they need may miss
some symbols which are needed by libgcc. This is the case for raise()
which is needed by the divide by zero code in some architectures for
example.
Regardless, being able to include only the apparently needed files is
convenient.
Instead of trying to move all exported definitions to a single file,
since this can change over time, this patch takes another approach
consisting in including the nolibc header at the end of all standard
include files. This way their types and functions are already known
at the moment of inclusion, and including any single one of them is
sufficient to bring all the required ones.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The time() syscall is used by a few simple applications, and is trivial
to implement based on gettimeofday() that we already have. Let's create
the file to ease porting and provide the function. It never returns any
error, though it may segfault in case of invalid pointer, like other
implementations relying on gettimeofday().
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
