The function btrfs_subpage_assert() is a very commonly utilized assert
to make sure the range passed in is correct inside the folio.
And when some code is not properly subpage/large folio compatible
btrfs_subpage_assert() will be the first to be triggered.
E.g. when I incorrectly enabled large folios for data reloc inodes, it
immediately triggered btrfs_subpage_assert().
In that case, outputting all the involved members will be very helpful,
this includes:
- start
- len
- folio position inside the mapping
- folio size
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simplify folio_pos() + folio_size() and use the new helper.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With the incoming large data folios support, the structure name
btrfs_subpage is no longer correct, as for we can have multiple blocks
inside a large folio, and the block size is still page size.
So to follow the schema of iomap, rename btrfs_subpage to
btrfs_folio_state, along with involved enums.
There are still exported functions with "btrfs_subpage_" prefix, and I
believe for metadata the name "subpage" will stay forever as we will
never allocate a folio larger than nodesize anyway.
The full cleanup of the word "subpage" will happen in much smaller steps
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The subpage handling code has two locations not supporting large folios:
- btrfs_attach_subpage()
Which is doing a metadata specific ASSERT() check.
But for the future large data folios support, that check is too
generic. Since it's metadata specific, only check the ASSERT() for
metadata.
- btrfs_subpage_assert()
Just remove the "ASSERT(folio_order(folio) == 0)" check.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After enabling large data folios for tests, I hit the ASSERT() inside
GET_SUBPAGE_BITMAP() where blocks_per_folio matches BITS_PER_LONG.
The ASSERT() itself is only based on the original subpage fs block size,
where we have at most 16 blocks per page, thus
"ASSERT(blocks_per_folio < BITS_PER_LONG)".
However the experimental large data folio support will set the max folio
order according to the BITS_PER_LONG, so we can have a case where a large
folio contains exactly BITS_PER_LONG blocks.
So the ASSERT() is too strict, change it to
"ASSERT(blocks_per_folio <= BITS_PER_LONG)" to avoid the false alert.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Inside the macro, subpage_calc_start_bit(), we need to calculate the
offset to the beginning of the folio.
But we're using offset_in_page(), on systems with 4K page size and 4K fs
block size, this means we will always return offset 0 for a large folio,
causing all kinds of errors.
Fix it by using offset_in_folio() instead.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we can no longer assume all data filemap folios are page sized,
use proper folio_size() calls to determine the folio size, as a
preparation for future large data filemap folios.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we can no longer assume page sized folio for data filemap folios,
allow btrfs_alloc_subpage() to accept a new parameter, @fsize,
indicating the folio size.
This doesn't follow the regular behavior of passing a folio directly,
because this function is shared by both data and metadata folios, and
for metadata folios we have extra allocation policy to ensure no large
folios whose sizes are larger than nodesize (unless it's page sized).
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To support large data folios, we can no longer assume every filemap
folio is page sized.
So btrfs_is_subpage() check must be done against a folio.
Thankfully for metadata folios, we have the full control and ensure a
large folio will not be large than nodesize, so
btrfs_meta_is_subpage() doesn't need this change.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike folio helpers for date the ones for metadata always take the
extent buffer start and length, so they can be simplified to take the
eb only. The fs_info can be obtained from eb too so it can be dropped
as parameter.
Added in patch "btrfs: use metadata specific helpers to simplify extent
buffer helpers".
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we have btrfs_meta_is_subpage(), we should make btrfs_is_subpage()
to be data inode specific.
This change involves:
- Simplify btrfs_is_subpage()
Now we only need to do a very simple sectorsize check against
PAGE_SIZE.
And since the function is pretty simple now, just make it an inline
function.
- Add an extra ASSERT() to make sure btrfs_is_subpage() is only called
on data inode mapping
- Migrate btree_csum_one_bio() to use btrfs_meta_folio_*() helpers
- Migrate alloc_extent_buffer() to use btrfs_meta_folio_*() helpers
- Migrate end_bbio_meta_write() to use btrfs_meta_folio_*() helpers
Or we will trigger the ASSERT() due to calling btrfs_folio_*() on
metadata folios.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty() is called on dirty extent buffer
that will not be written back.
The function will call btree_clear_folio_dirty() to clear the folio
dirty flag and also clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY flag.
And we split the subpage and regular handling, as for subpage cases we
should only clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY if the last dirty extent buffer in
the page is cleared.
So here we can simplify the function by:
- Use the newly introduced btrfs_meta_folio_clear_and_test_dirty() helper
The helper will return true if we cleared the folio dirty flag.
With that we can use the same helper for both subpage and regular
cases.
- Rename btree_clear_folio_dirty() to btree_clear_folio_dirty_tag()
As we move the folio dirty clearing in the btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty().
- Call btrfs_meta_folio_clear_and_test_dirty() to clear the dirty flags
for both regular and subpage metadata cases
- Only call btree_clear_folio_dirty_tag() when the folio is no longer
dirty
- Update the comment inside set_extent_buffer_dirty()
As there is no separate clear_subpage_extent_buffer_dirty() anymore.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The following functions are doing metadata specific checks:
- set_extent_buffer_uptodate()
- clear_extent_buffer_uptodate()
The reason why we do not use btrfs_folio_*() helpers for those helpers
is, btrfs_is_subpage() cannot handle dummy extent buffer if nodesize >=
PAGE_SIZE but block size < PAGE_SIZE.
In that case, we do not need to attach extra bitmaps to the extent
buffer folio. But since dummy extent buffer folios are not attached to
btree inode, btrfs_is_subpage() will return true, causing problems.
And the following are using btrfs_folio_*() helpers for metadata, but
in theory we should use metadata specific checks:
- set_extent_buffer_dirty()
This is not causing problems because a dummy extent buffer should never
be marked dirty.
To make code simpler, introduce btrfs_meta_folio_*() helpers, to do
the metadata specific handling, so that we do not to open-code such
checks in above involved functions.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently subpage attach/detach is not doing proper dummy extent buffer
subpage check, as btrfs_is_subpage() is not reliable for dummy extent
buffer folios.
Since we have a metadata specific check now, use that for
btrfs_attach_subpage() first.
Then enhance btrfs_detach_subpage() to accept a type parameter, so that
we can do extra checks for dummy extent buffers properly.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we have only one btrfs_is_subpage() to cover both data and
metadata.
But there is a special case for metadata:
- dummy extent buffer, sector size < PAGE_SIZE and node size >= PAGE_SIZE
In such case, btrfs_is_subpage() will return true for extent buffer
folio.
But that is not correct, and that's exactly why we have some open-coded
checks for functions like set_extent_buffer_uptodate() and
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate().
Just extract the metadata specific checks into a helper, and replace
those call sites.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For the future large folio support, our filemap can have folios with
different sizes, thus we can no longer rely on a fixed blocks_per_page
value.
To prepare for that future, here we do:
- Remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page
- Introduce a helper, btrfs_blocks_per_folio()
Which uses the folio size to calculate the number of blocks for each
folio.
- Migrate the existing btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page to use that
helper
There are some exceptions:
* Metadata nodesize < page size support
In the future, even if we support large folios, we will only
allocate a folio that matches our nodesize.
Thus we won't have a folio covering multiple metadata unless
nodesize < page size.
* Existing subpage bitmap dump
We use a single unsigned long to store the bitmap.
That means until we change the bitmap dumping code, our upper limit
for folio size will only be 256K (4K block size, 64 bit unsigned
long).
* btrfs_is_subpage() check
This will be migrated into a future patch.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove references to the page lock and page->mapping. Also btrfs folios
can never be swizzled into swap (mentioned in extent_write_cache_pages()).
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() and btrfs_folio_set_lock(), we call
bitmap_test_range_all_zero() to ensure the involved range has no
dirty/lock bit already set.
However with my recent enhanced delalloc range error handling, I was
hitting the ASSERT() inside btrfs_folio_set_lock(), and it turns out
that some error handling path is not properly updating the folio flags.
So add some extra dumping for the ASSERTs to dump the involved bitmap
to help debug.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're dumping the locked bitmap into the @checked_bitmap variable,
printing incorrect values during debug.
Thankfully even during my development I haven't hit a case where I need
to dump the locked bitmap. But for the sake of consistency, fix it by
dupping the locked bitmap into @locked_bitmap variable for output.
Fixes: 75258f20fb ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for debug")
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Smatch complains about possibly dereferencing a NULL fs_info at
btrfs_folio_end_lock_bitmap():
fs/btrfs/subpage.c:332 btrfs_folio_end_lock_bitmap() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'fs_info' (see line 326)
because we access fs_info to set the 'start_bit' variable before doing the
check for a NULL fs_info.
However fs_info is never NULL, since in the only caller of
btrfs_folio_end_lock_bitmap() is extent_writepage(), where we have an
inode which always as a non-NULL fs_info.
So remove the check for a NULL fs_info at btrfs_folio_end_lock_bitmap().
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since there is no user of reader locks, rename the writer locks into a
more generic name, by removing the "_writer" part from the name.
And also rename btrfs_subpage::writer into btrfs_subpage::locked.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit d7172f52e9 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for
extent_buffer reading"), metadata read no longer relies on the subpage
reader locking.
This means we do not need to maintain a different metadata/data split
for locking, so we can convert the existing reader lock users by:
- add_ra_bio_pages()
Convert to btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
- end_folio_read()
Convert to btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
- begin_folio_read()
Convert to btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
- folio_range_has_eb()
Remove the subpage->readers checks, since it is always 0.
- Remove btrfs_subpage_start_reader() and btrfs_subpage_end_reader()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is not really suitable to lock a folio, as it lacks the
proper mapping checks, thus the locked folio may not even belong to
btrfs.
And due to the above reason, the last user inside lock_delalloc_folios()
is already removed, and we can remove this function.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently for subpage (sector size < page size) cases, we reuse subpage
locked bitmap to find out all delalloc ranges we have locked, and run
all those found ranges.
However such reuse is not perfect, e.g.:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above range, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will handle the range
[32K, 96k), note delalloc range can be beyond the page boundary.
But writepage_delalloc() for page 64K will only handle range [120K,
128K), as the previous run on page 0 has already handled range [64K,
96K).
Meanwhile for the writeback we should expect range [64K, 96K) to also be
locked, this leads to the mismatch from locked bitmap and delalloc
range.
This is not causing problems yet, but it's still an inconsistent
behavior.
So instead of relying on the subpage locked bitmap, move the delalloc
range search using local @delalloc_bitmap, so that we can remove the
existing btrfs_folio_find_writer_locked().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[SUBPAGE COMPRESSION LIMITS]
Currently inside writepage_delalloc(), if a delalloc range is going to
be submitted asynchronously (inline or compression, the page
dirty/writeback/unlock are all handled in at different time, not at the
submission time), then we return 1 and extent_writepage() will skip the
submission.
This is fine if every sector matches page size, but if a sector is
smaller than page size (aka, subpage case), then it can be very
problematic, for example for the following 64K page:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|/| |///////| |/|
| |
4K 52K
Where |/| is the dirty range we need to submit.
In the above case, we need the following different handling for the 3
ranges:
- [0, 4K) needs to be submitted for regular write
A single sector cannot be compressed.
- [16K, 32K) needs to be submitted for compressed write
- [48K, 52K) needs to be submitted for regular write.
Above, if we try to submit [16K, 32K) for compressed write, we will
return 1 and immediately, and without submitting the remaining
[48K, 52K) range.
Furthermore, since extent_writepage() will exit without unlocking any
sectors, the submitted range [0, 4K) will not have sector unlocked.
That's the reason why for now subpage is only allowed for full page
range.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Introduce a submission bitmap at btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap
This records which sectors will be submitted by extent_writepage_io().
This allows us to track which sectors needs to be submitted thus later
to be properly unlocked.
For asynchronously submitted range (inline/compression), the
corresponding bits will be cleared from that bitmap.
- Only return 1 if no sector needs to be submitted in
writepage_delalloc()
- Only submit sectors marked by submission bitmap inside
extent_writepage_io()
So we won't touch the asynchronously submitted part.
- Introduce btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() helper
This will only unlock the involved sectors specified by @bitmap
parameter, to avoid touching the range asynchronously submitted.
Please note that, since subpage compression is still limited to page
aligned range, this change is only a preparation for future sector
perfect compression support for subpage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_unlock_writer() is already calling
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to do the heavy lifting work, the only
missing 0 writer check.
Thus there is no need to keep two different functions, move the 0 writer
check into btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock(), and remove
btrfs_folio_unlock_writer().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() is only utilized in
extent_writepage() as a way to unlock all subpage range (for both
successful submission and error handling).
Meanwhile we have a similar function, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock().
The difference is, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() expects a range that is
a subset of the already locked range.
This limit on btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() is a little overkilled,
preventing it from being utilized for error paths.
So here we enhance btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to accept a superset of
the locked range, and only end the locked subset.
This means we can replace btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() with
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() instead.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The member btrfs_fs_info::subpage_info stores the cached bitmap start
position inside the merged bitmap.
However in reality there is only one thing depending on the sectorsize,
bitmap_nr_bits, which records the number of sectors that fit inside a
page.
The sequence of sub-bitmaps have fixed order, thus it's just a quick
multiplication to calculate the start position of each sub-bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike the bitmap usage inside raid56, for __extent_writepage_io() we
handle the subpage submission not sector-by-sector, but for each dirty
range we found.
This is not a big deal normally, as the subpage complex code is already
mostly optimized out by the compiler for x86_64.
However for the sake of consistency and for the future of subpage
sector-perfect compression support, this patch does:
- Extract the sector submission code into submit_one_sector()
- Add the needed code to extract the dirty bitmap for subpage case
There is a small pitfall for non-subpage case, as we cleared page
dirty before starting writeback, so we have to manually set
the default dirty_bitmap to 1 for such case.
- Use bitmap_and() to calculate the target sectors we need to submit
This is done for both subpage and non-subpage cases, and will later
be expanded to skip inline/compression ranges.
For x86_64, the dirty bitmap will be fixed to 1, with the length of 1,
so we're still doing the same workload per sector.
For larger page sizes, the overhead will be a little larger, as previous
we only need to do one extent_map lookup per-dirty-range, but now it
will be one extent_map lookup per-sector.
But that is the same frequency as x86_64, so we're just aligning the
behavior to x86_64.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In commit 75258f20fb ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for
debug") an internal macro GET_SUBPAGE_BITMAP() is introduced to grab the
bitmap of each attribute.
But that commit is using bitmap_cut() which will do the left shift of
the larger bitmap, causing incorrect values.
Thankfully this bitmap_cut() is only called for debug usage, and so far
it's not yet causing problem.
Fix it to use bitmap_read() to only grab the desired sub-bitmap.
Fixes: 75258f20fb ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for debug")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs only supports sectorsize 4K, 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K for now, thus for
systems with 4K page size, there is no way the fs is subpage (sectorsize
< PAGE_SIZE).
So here we define btrfs_is_subpage() different according to the
PAGE_SIZE:
- PAGE_SIZE > 4K
We may hit real subpage cases, define btrfs_is_subpage() as a regular
function and do the usual checks.
- PAGE_SIZE == 4K (no smaller PAGE_SIZE support AFAIK)
There is no way the fs is subpage, so just define btrfs_is_subpage()
as an inline function which always return false.
This saves about 7K bytes for x86_64 debug builds:
text data bss dec hex filename
Before: 1484452 168693 25776 1678921 199e49 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After: 1476605 168445 25776 1670826 197eaa fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to is_data_inode() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit 2b2553f123 ("btrfs: stop setting PageError in the data I/O
path") btrfs no longer utilizes subpage error bitmaps anymore, but the
commit forgot to remove the error bitmap in btrfs_subpage_dump_bitmap(),
resulting in possible meaningless result for the error bitmap.
Fix it by just removing the error bitmap dumping.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we have a subpage range like this for a 16K page with 4K sectorsize:
0 4K 8K 12K 16K
|/////| |//////| |
|/////| = dirty range
Currently writepage_delalloc() would go through the following steps:
- lock range [0, 4K)
- run delalloc range for [0, 4K)
- lock range [8K, 12K)
- run delalloc range for [8K 12K)
So far it's fine for regular subpage writeback, as
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() can only go into one of run_delalloc_nocow(),
cow_file_range() and run_delalloc_compressed().
But there is a special case for zoned subpage, where we will go
through run_delalloc_cow(), which would create the ordered extent for the
range and immediately submit the range.
This would unlock the whole page range, causing all kinds of different
ASSERT()s related to locked page.
Address the page unlocking problem of run_delalloc_cow(), by changing
the workflow to the following one:
- lock range [0, 4K)
- lock range [8K, 12K)
- run delalloc range for [0, 4K)
- run delalloc range for [8K, 12K)
So that run_delalloc_cow() can only unlock the full page until the
last lock user released.
To do that:
- Utilize subpage locked bitmap
So for every delalloc range we found, call
btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock() to populate the subpage locked bitmap,
and later btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() if the page is fully unlocked.
So we know there is a delalloc range that needs to be run later.
- Save the @delalloc_end as @last_delalloc_end inside writepage_delalloc()
Since subpage locked bitmap is only for ranges inside the page,
meanwhile we can have delalloc range ends beyond our page boundary,
we have to save the @last_delalloc_end just in case it's beyond our
page boundary.
Although there is one extra point to notice:
- We need to handle errors in previous iteration
Since we can have multiple locked delalloc ranges we have to call
run_delalloc_ranges() multiple times.
If we hit an error half way, we still need to unlock the remaining
ranges.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Three new helpers are introduced for the incoming subpage delalloc locking
change.
- btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
This is to mark specified range with subpage specific writer lock.
After calling this, the subpage range can be proper unlocked by
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
- btrfs_subpage_find_writer_locked()
This is to find the writer locked subpage range in a page.
With the help of btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock(), it can allow us to
record and find previously locked subpage range without extra memory
allocation.
- btrfs_folio_end_all_writers()
This is for the locked_page of __extent_writepage(), as there may be
multiple subpage delalloc ranges locked.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Function __extent_writepage_io() is designed to find all dirty ranges of
a page, and add the dirty ranges to the bio_ctrl for submission.
It requires all the dirtied ranges to be covered by an ordered extent.
It gets called in two locations, but one call site is not subpage aware:
- __extent_writepage()
It gets called when writepage_delalloc() returned 0, which means
writepage_delalloc() has handled delalloc for all subpage sectors
inside the page.
So this call site is OK.
- extent_write_locked_range()
This call site is utilized by zoned support, and in this case, we may
only run delalloc range for a subset of the page, like this: (64K page
size)
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|/////| |///////| |
In the above case, if extent_write_locked_range() is only triggered for
range [0, 16K), __extent_writepage_io() would still try to submit
the dirty range of [32K, 48K), then it would not find any ordered
extent for it and triggers various ASSERT()s.
Fix this problem by:
- Introducing @start and @len parameters to specify the range
For the first call site, we just pass the whole page, and the behavior
is not touched, since run_delalloc_range() for the page should have
created all ordered extents for the page.
For the second call site, we avoid touching anything beyond the
range, thus avoiding the dirty range which is not yet covered by any
delalloc range.
- Making btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() subpage aware
The only caller is inside __extent_writepage_io(), and since that
caller now accepts a subpage range, we should also check the subpage
range other than the whole page.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fix variable names in two macros where there's a local function variable
of the same name. In subpage_calc_start_bit() it's in several callers,
in btrfs_abort_transaction() it's only in replace_file_extents().
Found by 'make W=2'.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For the writer counter, it's pretty much the same as the reader counter,
and they are exclusive. So move them to the new locked bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently btrfs_subpage utilizes its atomic member @reader to manage the
reader counter. However it is only utilized to prevent the page to be
released/unlocked when we still have reads underway.
In that use case, we don't really allow multiple readers on the same
subpage sector. So here we can introduce a new locked bitmap to
represent exactly which subpage range is locked for read.
In theory we can remove btrfs_subpage::reader as it's just the set bits
of the new locked bitmap. But unfortunately bitmap doesn't provide such
handy API yet, so we still keep the reader counter.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Both functions were introduced in commit 1e1de38792 ("btrfs: make
process_one_page() to handle subpage locking"), but they have never
been utilized out of subpage code. So just unexport them.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=38MW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-6.8-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- zoned mode fixes:
- fix slowdown when writing large file sequentially by looking up
block groups with enough space faster
- locking fixes when activating a zone
- new mount API fixes:
- preserve mount options for a ro/rw mount of the same subvolume
- scrub fixes:
- fix use-after-free in case the chunk length is not aligned to
64K, this does not happen normally but has been reported on
images converted from ext4
- similar alignment check was missing with raid-stripe-tree
- subvolume deletion fixes:
- prevent calling ioctl on already deleted subvolume
- properly track flag tracking a deleted subvolume
- in subpage mode, fix decompression of an inline extent (zlib, lzo,
zstd)
- fix crash when starting writeback on a folio, after integration with
recent MM changes this needs to be started conditionally
- reject unknown flags in defrag ioctl
- error handling, API fixes, minor warning fixes
* tag 'for-6.8-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: scrub: limit RST scrub to chunk boundary
btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned
btrfs: don't unconditionally call folio_start_writeback in subpage
btrfs: use the original mount's mount options for the legacy reconfigure
btrfs: don't warn if discard range is not aligned to sector
btrfs: tree-checker: fix inline ref size in error messages
btrfs: zstd: fix and simplify the inline extent decompression
btrfs: lzo: fix and simplify the inline extent decompression
btrfs: zlib: fix and simplify the inline extent decompression
btrfs: defrag: reject unknown flags of btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args
btrfs: avoid copying BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag to snapshot of subvolume being deleted
btrfs: don't abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolume
btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()
btrfs: fix unbalanced unlock of mapping_tree_lock
btrfs: ref-verify: free ref cache before clearing mount opt
btrfs: fix kvcalloc() arguments order in btrfs_ioctl_send()
btrfs: zoned: optimize hint byte for zoned allocator
btrfs: zoned: factor out prepare_allocation_zoned()
In the normal case we check if a page is under writeback and skip it
before we attempt to begin writeback.
The exception is subpage metadata writes, where we know we don't have an
eb under writeback and we're doing it one eb at a time. Since
b5612c3686 ("mm: return void from folio_start_writeback() and related
functions") we now will BUG_ON() if we call folio_start_writeback()
on a folio that's already under writeback. Previously
folio_start_writeback() would bail if writeback was already started.
Fix this in the subpage code by checking if we have writeback set and
skipping it if we do. This fixes the panic we were seeing on subpage.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmWYTmMACgkQxWXV+ddt
WDvPRg/+KgS5LV3nNC0MguYcTMQxmgeutIgXZIMfeA3v6EnFS7nj8leP4EPc6+bj
JPSkwj4u2vHVwpnTVuEAuJUXnmFY+Qu70nVy6bM2uOHOYTVBQ8zRVK4cErNNLWCp
OekDaADR53RrZ/xprlQ7b7Ph0Ch2uq9OrpH50IcyquEsH1ffkxlqwyrvth4/8dxC
6zgsFHWrbtVKJf0DYoQPpjEPz5tpdQ+xHZwtmf1cNlUgI1objODr/ZTqXtZqTfw4
/GwrtDPbEri53K/qjgr0dDH7pBVqD6PtnbgoHfYkiizZ0G7UkmlaK6rZIurtATJb
Yk/RCqCUp9tPC4yeFSewFMm1Y8Ae3rkUBG7rnYkvMmBspMqyh/kQAWSBimF5yk/y
vFEdFTe9AbdvP19Nw0CqovLzaO6RrOXCL1usnFvCmBgvF5gZAv63ZW1njP3ZoNta
wB8Rs6hxdRkph8Dk7yvYf54uUR+JyKqjHY6egg2qkKTjz0CSf6qQFyFZXpr81m97
gK4WN5SeP/P2ukRbBKKyzZ5IljUxZuVatvJa0tktd7kAbU26WLzofOJ7pX+iqimM
F2G7gKGJZykLY1WPntXBp9Dg97Ras2O5iViQ7ZKwRdOx1yZS5zzTYlIznHBAmXbL
UgXfVnpJH1xFdkvedNTn+Fz9BHNV1K2a2AT7VITj7sxz23z3aJA=
=4sw3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-6.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"There are no exciting changes for users, it's been mostly API
conversions and some fixes or refactoring.
The mount API conversion is a base for future improvements that would
come with VFS. Metadata processing has been converted to folios, not
yet enabling the large folios but it's one patch away once everything
gets tested enough.
Core changes:
- convert extent buffers to folios:
- direct API conversion where possible
- performance can drop by a few percent on metadata heavy
workloads, the folio sizes are not constant and the calculations
add up in the item helpers
- both regular and subpage modes
- data cannot be converted yet, we need to port that to iomap and
there are some other generic changes required
- convert mount to the new API, should not be user visible:
- options deprecated long time ago have been removed: inode_cache,
recovery
- the new logic that splits mount to two phases slightly changes
timing of device scanning for multi-device filesystems
- LSM options will now work (like for selinux)
- convert delayed nodes radix tree to xarray, preserving the
preload-like logic that still allows to allocate with GFP_NOFS
- more validation of sysfs value of scrub_speed_max
- refactor chunk map structure, reduce size and improve performance
- extent map refactoring, smaller data structures, improved
performance
- reduce size of struct extent_io_tree, embedded in several
structures
- temporary pages used for compression are cached and attached to a
shrinker, this may slightly improve performance
- in zoned mode, remove redirty extent buffer tracking, zeros are
written in case an out-of-order is detected and proper data are
written to the actual write pointer
- cleanups, refactoring, error message improvements, updated tests
- verify and update branch name or tag
- remove unwanted text"
* tag 'for-6.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (89 commits)
btrfs: pass btrfs_io_geometry into btrfs_max_io_len
btrfs: pass struct btrfs_io_geometry to set_io_stripe
btrfs: open code set_io_stripe for RAID56
btrfs: change block mapping to switch/case in btrfs_map_block
btrfs: factor out block mapping for single profiles
btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID5/6
btrfs: reduce scope of data_stripes in btrfs_map_block
btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID10
btrfs: factor out block mapping for DUP profiles
btrfs: factor out RAID1 block mapping
btrfs: factor out block-mapping for RAID0
btrfs: re-introduce struct btrfs_io_geometry
btrfs: factor out helper for single device IO check
btrfs: migrate btrfs_repair_io_failure() to folio interfaces
btrfs: migrate eb_bitmap_offset() to folio interfaces
btrfs: migrate various end io functions to folios
btrfs: migrate subpage code to folio interfaces
btrfs: migrate get_eb_page_index() and get_eb_offset_in_page() to folios
btrfs: don't double put our subpage reference in alloc_extent_buffer
btrfs: cleanup metadata page pointer usage
...
Although subpage itself is conflicting with higher folio, since subpage
(sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE and nodesize < PAGE_SIZE) means we will never
need higher order folio, there is a hidden pitfall:
- btrfs_page_*() helpers
Those helpers are an abstraction to handle both subpage and non-subpage
cases, which means we're going to pass pages pointers to those helpers.
And since those helpers are shared between data and metadata paths, it's
unavoidable to let them to handle folios, including higher order
folios).
Meanwhile for true subpage case, we should only have a single page
backed folios anyway, thus add a new ASSERT() for btrfs_subpage_assert()
to ensure that.
Also since those helpers are shared between both data and metadata, add
some extra ASSERT()s for data path to make sure we only get single page
backed folio for now.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Although we have migrated extent_buffer::pages[] to folios[], we're
still mostly using the folio_page() help to grab the page.
This patch would do the following cleanups for metadata:
- Introduce num_extent_folios() helper
This is to replace most num_extent_pages() callers.
- Use num_extent_folios() to iterate future large folios
This allows us to use things like
bio_add_folio()/bio_add_folio_nofail(), and only set the needed flags
for the folio (aka the leading/tailing page), which reduces the loop
iteration to 1 for large folios.
- Change metadata related functions to use folio pointers
Including their function name, involving:
* attach_extent_buffer_page()
* detach_extent_buffer_page()
* page_range_has_eb()
* btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages()
* btree_clear_page_dirty()
* btrfs_page_inc_eb_refs()
* btrfs_page_dec_eb_refs()
- Change btrfs_is_subpage() to accept an address_space pointer
This is to allow both page->mapping and folio->mapping to be utilized.
As data is still using the old per-page code, and may keep so for a
while.
- Special corner case place holder for future order mismatches between
extent buffer and inode filemap
For now it's just a block of comments and a dead ASSERT(), no real
handling yet.
The subpage code would still go page, just because subpage and large
folio are conflicting conditions, thus we don't need to bother subpage
with higher order folios at all. Just folio_page(folio, 0) would be
enough.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor styling tweaks ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As a cleanup and preparation for future folio migration, this patch
would replace all page->private to folio version. This includes:
- PagePrivate()
-> folio_test_private()
- page->private
-> folio_get_private()
- attach_page_private()
-> folio_attach_private()
- detach_page_private()
-> folio_detach_private()
Since we're here, also remove the forced cast on page->private, since
it's (void *) already, we don't really need to do the cast.
For now even if we missed some call sites, it won't cause any problem
yet, as we're only using order 0 folio (single page), thus all those
folio/page flags should be synced.
But for the future conversion to utilize higher order folio, the page
<-> folio flag sync is no longer guaranteed, thus we have to migrate to
utilize folio flags.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It is hard to find where mapping->private_lock, mapping->private_list and
mapping->private_data are used, due to private_XXX being a relatively
common name for variables and structure members in the kernel. To fit
with other members of struct address_space, rename them all to have an
i_ prefix. Tested with an allmodconfig build.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117215823.2821906-1-willy@infradead.org
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
PageError is not used by the VFS/MM and deprecated because it uses up a
page bit and has no coherent rules. Instead read errors are usually
propagated by not setting or clearing the uptodate bit, and write errors
are propagated through the address_space. Btrfs now only sets the flag
and never clears it for data pages, so just remove all places setting it,
and the subpage error bit.
Note that the error propagation for superblock writes that work on the
block device mapping still uses PageError for now, but that will be
addressed in a separate series.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
