When the EC/ISH starts, it can take a while for all the sensors to be up
and running or declared broken.
If the sensor stack return -EBUSY when checking for sensor information,
retry up to 50 times.
It has been observed 100ms wait time is enough to have valid sensors
ready. It can take more time in case a sensor is really broken and is
not coming up.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250623210518.306740-1-gwendal@google.com
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920090522.23784-9-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Allocate callbacks array before enumerating the sensors: The probe routine
for these sensors (for instance cros_ec_sensors_probe) can be called
within the sensorhub probe routine (cros_ec_sensors_probe())
Fixes: 145d59baff ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_sensorhub: Add FIFO support")
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
cros_ec_sensorhub registers a listener and query motion sense FIFO,
spread to iio sensors registers.
To test, we can use libiio:
iiod&
iio_readdev -u ip:localhost -T 10000 -s 25 -b 16 cros-ec-gyro | od -x
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
To better manage resources, store the number of sensors reported by
the EC.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
This header file now only includes the cros_ec_dev struct, however, is the
'include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h' who contains the definition of
all the Chrome OS EC related structs. There is no reason to have a
separate include for this struct so move to the place where other
structs are defined. That way, we can remove the include itself, but also
simplify the common pattern
#include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
for a single include
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
The changes to remove the cros_ec.h include were generated with the
following shell script:
git grep -l "<linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>" | xargs sed -i '/<linux\/mfd\/cros_ec.h>/d'
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Similar to HID sensor stack, the new driver sits between cros-ec-dev
and the IIO device drivers:
The EC based IIO device topology would be:
iio:device1 ->
...0/0000:00:1f.0/PNP0C09:00/GOOG0004:00/cros-ec-dev.6.auto/
cros-ec-sensorhub.7.auto/
cros-ec-accel.15.auto/
iio:device1
It will be expanded to control EC sensor FIFO.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[Fix "unknown type name 'uint32_t'" type errors]
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
