Some device names were wrong because our internal data suggested
that discrete Ga devices have B-step RF, when they actually have
C-step. However, matching the step for them is bad anyway.
Change the code to be able to find the devinfo depending on the
device being integrated or discrete. This is only for the names,
since the RF config cannot be different for the same RF because
it's discrete or integrated, so add a kunit test that ensures
both (a) the RF config is the same and (b) the name is different
(the latter really only because that's the whole point of having
a match on the discrete/integrated bit.)
Remove the RF step matching since it's no longer needed now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709081300.e048a94659f1.Ie5919c70e9d8e3a28152aaf3cdffd19ed3d4f5c7@changeid
We don't need the CORES() match nor jacket (which really doesn't
even make sense to match to the RF anyway), and since the subdevice
masks we care about are contiguous, we can encode them as highest
and lowest bit set (automatically.) By encoding whether to match or
not as separate flags and taking advantage of the limited range of
the RF type, step and ID we can reduce the amount of memory needed
for the table, while also making the logic (apart perhaps from the
subdevice mask) easier to understand.
This reduces the size of the module by about 1.5KiB on x86-64.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511195137.38a805a7c96f.Ieece00476cea6054b0827cd075eb8ba5943373df@changeid
Now that it's all split into MAC and RF configs, remove
the matching on MAC type and step. If we ever need to do
something based on the MAC step, we'll have to find some
new mechanism (since the MAC type is known already from
the PCI IDs table, but not the step), or just handle the
(likely small) differences in code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250510214621.fca99a5ab315.Iae27b781221fd29845493adf2c29d9e4f7a9c33b@changeid
With all the cleanups now, we can rename the structure to
better indicate the functionality. For older devices this
isn't quite accurate, of course, but it's better to have a
name that reflects future use for maintenance.
Add some kernel-doc while at it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250509104454.2582160-9-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
For now, the WH and PE radios require the same config as
FM, so just add a #define for those instead of copying
the data. Since this is true, Sc/Dr/Br all used the same
configs for all RF types, but that's confusing, so now
use the defined WH/PE names for the correct combinations.
We can also now enable the unit test that ensures we have
no duplicate RF configs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250509104454.2582160-8-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Since 9000 series devices, the devices are split into MAC and
CRF parts. Currently, "struct iwl_cfg" reflects some MAC and
some RF parameters, but we want to clean this up and move the
MAC data to what's now "struct iwl_cfg_trans_params". As the
first step, to reflect the intent, rename this structure.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250508121306.1277801-9-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
There's no need to build a list of individual configs
first and then compare them, we can just go through all
of them and compare if the pointers aren't the same.
The complexity (in terms of number of comparisons) is a
bit higher that way, but it's just a test and the code
complexity is much lower without that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250504132447.85911c59d96a.I540f464229da3566d1726dfb61b46002fbb73bde@changeid
For different MACs we maintain the configs in different
files, and while it's a small waste of space, this is a
worthwhile trade-off for maintenance and simplicity. So
allow different MAC types to have the same config. This
could allow the same config for two MACs in the same MAC
family, but that's not hugely important. Also simplify
the test to not build a config list, there's no good
reason to do that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250504132447.27f5d570eb32.I1649309a0e54a1d446a38c5b2124a582de9f6d61@changeid
A long time ago, when transport vs. device configs were
introduced, we wanted to eventually have a list of PCI
IDs and a separate list of devices, but for simplicity
embedded the transport config in the whole config, and
it all got confusing.
Finish splitting that out. Doing so requires having more
IWL_DEV_INFO() entries, but the whole trans/cfg aliasing
goes away and the code becomes a lot simpler.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250502155404.e03f65c0f693.I076a997f800db455b575008f9488b151738ad7ec@changeid
The BW limit, cores and RF ID are matched in the subdevice ID,
so it doesn't really make sense to have both SUBDEV() match and
a match on any of those three. In particular, for Killer devices
the subdevice ID doesn't even follow the layout, so no matching
should be on those three values at all, only with SUBDEV().
Change the logic around the BW limit to have it more like all
the other things: only a bw_limit match in the dev_info, and
put the actual bandwidth into struct iwl_cfg. This duplicates a
number of those values, but that way the logic is clearer.
Add a test that checks that the three matches mentioned above
are not used in conjunction with SUBDEV(), and check that if
the bw_limit is matched, a BW limit is provided in the config.
Also check that the "Killer" devices have a SUBDEV() match.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250502155404.a185eac2736c.I87ee87300c92518a1d3296d3eda9fd4163e9085e@changeid
We'll have devices that are EHT capable but don't support 320 MHz and
those devices look like the 320 MHz capable devices, but have distinct
subsystem ID.
We already had the same type of differentiation for HE devices that
support 160 MHz or not.
Enhance that mechanism and now the _IWL_DEV_INFO macro gets an
indication whether the bandwidth should be limited for that specific
device.
The subsystem ID gives a binary answer about the bandwidth limitation
and iwl_pci_find_dev_info() compares this to the list of _IWL_DEV_INFO
entries.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250205145347.1ba406c538a5.I6e24123f60a764aedfeaaac8768c26e136c320cf@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We shouldn't have entries in the table that match the same
device; it's possible to have a specific entry followed by
a less specific entry (i.e. NNNN followed by ANY), but not
entries that are dead, where an earlier entry matches the
same as a later one.
Add a test similar to the existing devinfo test to catch
this situation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240319100755.826b859abd62.I8140d7e9ae52ac50c6830818f8f95ccd0d94b3d3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We used to have a test built into the code for this internally,
but now we can put that into kunit and let everyone run it, to
verify the devinfo table ordering if it's changed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240123200528.a4a8af7c091f.I0fb09083317b331168b99b8db39656a126a5cc4d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
