When the action of an xdp program was XDP_TX, lan966x was creating
a xdp_frame and use this one to send the frame back. But it is also
possible to send back the frame without needing a xdp_frame, because
it is possible to send it back using the page.
And then once the frame is transmitted is possible to use directly
page_pool_recycle_direct as lan966x is using page pools.
This would save some CPU usage on this path, which results in higher
number of transmitted frames. Bellow are the statistics:
Frame size: Improvement:
64 ~8%
256 ~11%
512 ~8%
1000 ~0%
1500 ~0%
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230422142344.3630602-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Extend lan966x XDP support with the action XDP_REDIRECT. This is similar
with the XDP_TX, so a lot of functionality can be reused.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend lan966x XDP support with the action XDP_TX. In this case when the
received buffer needs to execute XDP_TX, the buffer will be moved to the
TX buffers. So a new RX buffer will be allocated.
When the TX finish with the frame, it would give back the buffer to the
page pool.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To add support for XDP_TX it is required to be able to write to the DMA
area therefore it is required that the pages will be mapped using
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL flag.
Therefore check if there are any xdp programs on the interfaces and in
that case set DMA_BIDRECTIONAL otherwise use DMA_FROM_DEVICE.
Therefore when a new XDP program is added it is required to redo the
page_pool.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Update the page_pool params to allocate XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM space as
headroom for all received frames.
This is needed for when the XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT are implemented.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Introduce basic XDP support to lan966x driver. Currently the driver
supports only the actions XDP_PASS, XDP_DROP and XDP_ABORTED.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
