Plumb the format info from .fb_create() all the way to
drm_helper_mode_fill_fb_struct() to avoid the redundant
lookup.
For the fbdev case a manual drm_get_format_info() lookup
is needed.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250701090722.13645-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Decouple .get_format_info() from struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 and just
pass the pixel format+modifier combo in by hand.
We may want to use .get_format_info() outside of the normal
addfb paths where we won't have a struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2, and
creating a temporary one just for this seems silly.
v2: Fix intel_fb_get_format_info() docs (Laurent)
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <siqueira@igalia.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250701090722.13645-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Encapsulate the struct intel_framebuffer into an xe_framebuffer
or i915_framebuffer, and allow to add specific fields for each
variant for the panic use-case.
This is particularly needed to have a struct xe_res_cursor available
to support drm panic on discrete GPU.
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624091501.257661-7-jfalempe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Make i915->display pointer opaque to most of core i915 driver. Lots of
places now need explicit include of intel_display_core.h, or a more
specific header.
With this dependency broken, changes in display should cause radically
less recompilation of i915.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b381b59acb7e4f600e0282935a68aedf77768109.1747907216.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Move intel_fb_xy_to_linear() and intel_add_fb_offsets()
These are technially sitting somewhere between plane vs. fb code,
but we do have a bunch of code like that in intel_fb.c anyway.
Might need to think about splitting intel_fb.c into pure fb vs.
plane->fb related stuff somehow, but dunno if that's even feasible.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250213150220.13580-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Move intel_{rotation,remapped}_info_size() into intel_fb.c as
that seems a slightly better place than intel_display.c. I suppose
these should live somewhere outside the display code as they are
also used by the gem code.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250213150220.13580-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Make the intel_fb_bo.h interfaces operated purely in base
drm_ types so that each driver (i915 and xe) doesn't have to
know about each other, or the display stuff.
v2: s/dev/drm/ (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Pass the device argument as drm_device to intel_plane_fb_max_stride()
to decouple i915_gem_dumb_create() vs. the display code a bit.
xe currently doesn't even call this, but it probably should...
v2: s/dev/drm/ (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Bspec lists different VT-d guard numbers (the number of dummy
padding PTEs) for different platforms and plane types. Use those
instead of just assuming the max glk+ number for everything.
This could avoid a bit of overhead on older platforms due to
reduced padding, and it makes it easier to cross check with the
spec.
Note that VLV/CHV do not document this w/a at all, so not sure
if it's actually needed or not. Nor do we actually know how much
padding is required if it is needed. For now use the same 128
PTEs that we use for snb-bdw primary planes.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250122151755.6928-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Currently i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane() uses
i915_gem_object_get_tile_row_size() to calculate the tile row
size for the VT-d guard w/a. That's not really proper since
i915_gem_object_get_tile_row_size() only works for fenced BOs,
nor does it take rotation into account.
Remedy the situation by calculating the VT-d guard size in the
display code where we have more information readily available.
Although the default guard size (168 PTEs now) should cover
the more typical fb size use cases anyway, and only very large
Y/Yf-tiled framebuffers might have tile row size that exceeds it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250122151755.6928-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Make sure the user supplied offset[] for the clear color plane
fits within the actual BO. Note that we use tile units to track
the size here. All the other color/aux planes are already
being checked correctly.
Cc: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Cc: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241129065014.8363-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
We're currently failing to provide any debug output when the
user passes in a misaligned offset for the clear color plane.
Add some debugs prints to make debugging actually possible.
Cc: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Cc: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241129065014.8363-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Mesa changed its clear color alignment from 4k to 64 bytes
without informing the kernel side about the change. This
is now likely to cause framebuffer creation to fail.
The only thing we do with the clear color buffer in i915 is:
1. map a single page
2. read out bytes 16-23 from said page
3. unmap the page
So the only requirement we really have is that those 8 bytes
are all contained within one page. Thus we can deal with the
Mesa regression by reducing the alignment requiment from 4k
to the same 64 bytes in the kernel. We could even go as low as
32 bytes, but IIRC 64 bytes is the hardware requirement on
the 3D engine side so matching that seems sensible.
Note that the Mesa alignment chages were partially undone
so the regression itself was already fixed on userspace
side.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Cc: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com>
Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13057
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/45a5bba8de009347262d86a4acb27169d9ae0d9f.camel@xry111.site/
Link: 17f97a69c1
Link: 888f63cf1b
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241129065014.8363-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Tested-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Xe3 has no more support for x-tile on display.
v2: Include up to display 29 for X-tiled support. (Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Heikkila, Juha-pekka <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241028193015.3241858-9-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com
We don't use the block size information for the clear color
plane. Technically the entire fb is the single block for the
single 64B clear color surface, so there is just no way to
delcare that as a constant since the fb size can be anything.
Define the clear color block size as 0x0 to make things less
confusing. We already declared that cpp/chars_per_block=0 for
the clear color as well. That also causes the drm core code
to mostly ignore the clear color plane, which is exactly
what we want since that code doesn't know how to deal with
the clear color plane.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240918144445.5716-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Prefer the driver agnostic struct drm_gem_object over i915 specific
struct drm_i915_gem_object.
The xe specific intel_fb_bo.h becomes redundant. Remove it, and rely on
the common header in i915 display.
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0efbc9ae2dbe157f92fa71d423ed37fd17346da5.1726589119.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The display code needs to deal with gem objects, and mostly uses struct
drm_i915_gem_object. That's not great, because for xe we need to
redefine it struct xe_bo during build.
Start a common interface using struct drm_gem_object, with separate
implementations for i915 and xe. For starters, convert i9xx_wm.c to use
it.
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/df6867523a0b5fdd4eb63f657f545603ae6f6e0b.1726589119.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Some plane formats have been designed to require 64k physical alignment.
By returning whether this is the case for certain formats, we do not
need to hardcode this check inside Xe.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240826170117.327709-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Add I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED_BMG_CCS and I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED_LNL_CCS to possible
created modifier for new framebuffer on Xe driver.
Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240816115229.531671-4-juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
I don't think the display hardware really has such chroma
plane tile row alignment requirements as outlined in
commit d156135e6a ("drm/i915/tgl: Make sure a semiplanar
UV plane is tile row size aligned")
Bspec had the same exact thing to say about earlier hardware
as well, but we never cared and things work just fine.
The one thing mentioned in that commit that is definitely
true however is the fence alignment issue. But we don't
deal with that on earlier hardware either. We do have code
to deal with that issue for the first color plane, but not
the chroma planes. So I think if we did want to check this
more extensively we should do it in the same places where
we already check the first color plane (namely
convert_plane_offset_to_xy() and intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init()).
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Now that all pre-skl platforms have their own .min_alignment()
functions the remainder of intel_surf_alignment() can be hoisted
into skl_univerals_plane.c (and renamed appropriately).
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Different planes could have different alignment requirements
even for the same format/modifier. Collect the alignment
requirements across all planes capable of scanning out the
fb such that the alignment is satisfactory to all those
planes.
So far this was sort of handled by making sure intel_surf_alignment()
declares the superset of all planes' alignment requirements,
but maintaining that manually is annoying. So we're going to move
towards each plane declaring only its own requirements, and thus
we need code to generate the superset.
v2: Drop the borked per-plane vma optimization (Imre)
Assert that the plane's declared alignment is POT (Imre)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Different hardware generations have different scanout alignment
requirements. Introduce a new vfunc that will allow us to
make that distinction without horrible if-ladders.
For now we directly plug in the existing intel_surf_alignment()
and intel_cursor_alignment() functions.
For fbdev we (temporarily) introduce intel_fbdev_min_alignment()
that simply queries the alignment from the primary plane of
the first crtc.
TODO: someone will need to fix xe's alignment handling
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Be a bit more consistent in our use of integer types in
the fb related calculatiosn. u32 we generally only use
for ggtt offsets and such, and everything else can be regular
(unsigned) ints.
There's also an overabundance of consts for local variables
in skl_check_main_surface() which is not something we generally
do. So get rid of those while at it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240506125718.26001-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
