Rename intel_update_active_dpll to intel_dpll_update_active in an
effort to have function names which are exported to start with
filenames they are exported from.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-15-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_compute_dpll to intel_dpll_compute in an
effort to make sure all function names that are exported have
the filename at start.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-14-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll to
intel_dpll_<release/reserve> in an effort to keep names of
exported functions start with the filename.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-13-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_unreference_dpll_crtc to intel_dpll_crtc_put
in an effort to keep names of exported functions start with the filename.
--v2
-Make the new name more sensible [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-11-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll to intel_dpll_[enable/disable]
in an effort to make sure all functions that are exported
start with the filename.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-10-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename functions to move away from using shared dpll in the dpll
framework as much as possible since dpll may not always be shared.
--v2
-Use intel_dpll_global instead of global_dpll [Jani]
--v3
-Just use intel_dpll [Jani]
--v4
-Drop the global from comments [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_shared_dpll to intel_dpll to represent both
shared and individual dplls. Since from MTL each PHY has it's
own PLL making the shared PLL naming a little outdated. In an
effort to make this framework accepting of future changes this
needs to be done.
--v2
-Use intel_dpll_global to make sure names start with the filename
[Jani/Ville]
-Explain the need of this rename [Jani]
--v3
-Just keep it intel_dpll [Jani]
--v4
-Fix comment [Jani]
-Use just num_dpll and dplls [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs to intel_dpll_funcs
since it needs to represent both shared and individual
dplls.
--v2
-Change intel_global_dpll to intel_dpll_global to be more
in line with the naming standard where the name should
start with the file name [Jani]
--v3
-Drop shared and global altogether [Jani]
--v4
-Keep declarations sorted [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename the macro for_each_shared_dpll to for_each_dpll since
this loop will not necessarily be used for only shared
dpll in future.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_shared_dpll_state to just intel_dpll_state since it may
not necessarily store share dpll state info specially since
DISPLAY_VER >= 14 PLL's are not shared.
Also change the name of variables which may have been associated as
a shared_dpll.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Use intel_display as an argument for intel_shared_dpll_init() and
replace drm_i915_private in function wherever possible.
While at it prefer using display->platform.xx over IS_PLATFORM.
Initialize dpio_phy and dpio_channel since with IS_GEMINILAKE()
and IS_BROXTON() compiler knows it will return false for xe but
since display->platform.xx is a runtime check which means the
compiler sees a potential path where uninitialized variables
could be accessed and raises a warning.
--v2
-Amend commit message to explain why some variables were
initialized [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
We use intel_display for function hooks of shared_dpll_mgr and
any function that gets called when we use for_each_shared_dpll.
This also contains some opportunistic display->platform.xx changes
all to reductate the use of drm_i915_private.
--v2
-rebase
--v3
-Don't use inline to_i915 [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Let's use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state. This also
helps elimanate drm_i915_private dependency from i915_shared_dplls_info
in intel_display_debugfs.c
--v2
-Fix commit message [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Change the argument of for_each_shared_dpll to take intel_display which
helps move as an ongoing effort to get rid off the dependency on
drm_i915_private. Some opportunistic changes in intel_pch_refclk done
too.
--v2
-Prefer using &i915->display [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Fix all typos in files under drm/i915/display reported by codespell tool.
v2:
- Include british and american spelling, as those are
not typos.
- Fix commenting style. <Jani>
v3: Fix "In case" wrongly capitalized and
also fix comment style. <Krzysztof Niemiec>
Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Niemiec <krzysztof.niemiec@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250120081517.3237326-8-nitin.r.gote@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In TBT-alt mode the driver doesn't program the PHY's PLL, which is
handled instead by Thunderbolt driver/FW components, hence the PLL's HW
vs. SW state verification should be skipped. During HW readout set a flag
in the PLL state if the port was at the moment in TBT-alt mode and skip
the verification of PLL parameters in this case.
Fixes: 45fe957ae7 ("drm/i915/display: Add compare config for MTL+ platforms")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11258
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240626170813.806470-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Currently, we may bump into pll mismatch errors during the
state verification stage. This happens when we try to use
fastset instead of full modeset. Hence, we would need to add
a check for pipe configuration to ensure that the sw and the
hw configuration will match. In case of hw and sw mismatch,
we would need to disable fastset and use full modeset instead.
v2: Fix C10 error on PLL comparison (BAT)
Use memcmp instead of fixed loops for pll config
comparison (Jani)
Clean up and use intel_cx0pll_dump_hw_state() to dump
pll information (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240523134649.31452-3-mika.kahola@intel.com
For some reason the snps/cx0 PLL states were added into
a union alongside dpll_hw_state. Just suck them into
dpll_hw_state so that we don't have so many levels of
unions/etc.
TODO: Get rid of 'clock' from the snps/cx0 PLL states
as it is not a register values and thus doesn't
belong there
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-19-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
intel_dpll_hw_state contains space for all possible PLL
register values across all platforms. That is rather wasteful
as each machine only needs to store the registers values
that are appropriate for the platform.
Turn intel_dpll_hw_state into a union so that we don't
waste memory for the register values of other platforms.
And let's use an anonymous union so that we don't have
to do tons of s/struct/union/ all over the place.
pahole:
struct intel_dpll_hw_state {
- struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state i9xx; /* 0 16 */
- struct hsw_dpll_hw_state hsw; /* 16 8 */
- struct skl_dpll_hw_state skl; /* 24 12 */
- struct bxt_dpll_hw_state bxt; /* 36 44 */
- /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 16 bytes ago --- */
- struct icl_dpll_hw_state icl; /* 80 60 */
+ union {
+ struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state i9xx; /* 0 16 */
+ struct hsw_dpll_hw_state hsw; /* 0 8 */
+ struct skl_dpll_hw_state skl; /* 0 12 */
+ struct bxt_dpll_hw_state bxt; /* 0 44 */
+ struct icl_dpll_hw_state icl; /* 0 60 */
+ }; /* 0 60 */
- /* size: 140, cachelines: 3, members: 5 */
- /* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
+ /* size: 60, cachelines: 1, members: 1 */
+ /* last cacheline: 60 bytes */
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-18-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
struct intel_dpll_hw_state has a spot for all possible
PLL registers across all platforms (well, apart from
cx0/snps). This makes it rather confusing when trying to
figure out which members belong to which platform(s).
Split the struct up into five different platform specific
sub-structures. For now this will actually increase the size
a little bit as we have to duplicate a few members from
skl to icl, but that will be remedied soon when we turn
the thing into a union.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
We have zero consistency in out PLL state naming scheme. Try
to unify things a bit by using 'dpll_hw_state' for high level
stuff and just 'hw_state' for low level stuff. Currently both
are the same, but I want to unionize intel_dpll_hw_state at
which point using different names can make it more clear whether
we're talking about the whole union or just the embedded platform
specific struct.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Utilize drm_printer in pipe_config_pll_mismatch() to avoid
a bit of code duplication.
To achieve this we need to plumb the printer all way to the
dpll_mgr .dump_hw_state() functions. Those are also used by
intel_crtc_state_dump() which needs to be adjusted as well.
v2: Convert a few misplaecd drm_dbg_kms() calls (Rodrigo)
Drop the redundant drm_debug_enabled() check here
instead of later (Jani)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240229184049.31165-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Chunk up the humongous dpll_hw_state comparison check into per-platform
variants, implemented in the dpll_mgr. This is step one in allowing
each platform (or perhaps even PLL) type to have a custom hw state
structure instead of having to smash it all into one.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240209183809.16887-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
TC ports have both the MG/TC and TBT PLLs selected simultanously (so
that we can switch from MG/TC to TBT as a fallback). This doesn't play
well with the state checker that assumes that the old PLL shouldn't
have the pipe in its pipe_mask anymore. Suppress that check for these
PLLs to avoid spurious WARNs when you disconnect a TC port and a
non-disabling modeset happens before actually disabling the port.
v2: Only suppress when one of the PLLs is the TBT PLL and the
other one is not
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9816
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240123093137.9133-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Just include the JSL/EHL DPLL4 extra power domain in the dpll_info
struct. This way the same approach could be used by other platforms
as well (should the need arise), and we don't have to sprinkle
platform checks all over the place.
Note that I'm perhaps slightly abusing things here as
power_domain==0 (which is actually POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE) now
indicates that no extra power domain is needed. I suppose using
POWER_DOMAIN_INVALID would be more correct, but then we'd have to
sprinkle that to all the other DPLLs.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231012123522.26045-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
No one really cares how we store the shared_dplls. Currently
it happens to be an array, but we could change that to a more
flexible scheme at some point. Hide the implementation details
behind an iterator macro.
The slight downside is the pll variable moving out of the
loop scope, but maybe someday soon we'll start to convert
everything over to having declarations within for-statements...
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
There's no good reason to keep around this PLL index == PLL ID
footgun. Get rid of it.
Both i915->shared_dplls[] and state->shared_dpll[] are indexed
by the same thing now, which is just the index we get at
initialization from dpll_mgr->dpll_info[]. The rest is all about
PLL IDs now.
v2: Add pll->index to mimic drm_crtc & co.
Remove the comment saying ID should match the index
v3: s/i/pll->index/ in debugfs loop (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Make sure that the CRTC state is reset correctly, as expected after
disabling the CRTC.
In particular this change will:
- Zero all the CSC blob pointers after intel_crtc_free_hw_state()
has freed them.
- Zero the shared DPLL and port PLL pointers and clear the
corresponding CRTC reference flag in the PLL state.
- Reset all the transcoder and pipe fields.
v2:
- Reset fully the CRTC state. (Ville)
- Clear pipe active flags in the DPLL state.
v3:
- Clear only the CRTC reference flag and add a helper for this.
(Ville)
v4:
- Rebased on previous patch, adding
intel_unreference_shared_dpll_crtc() separately. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230510103131.1618266-4-imre.deak@intel.com
Split the DPLL state computation into a separate function
from the current .get_dplls() which currently serves a dual duty
by also reserving the shared DPLLs.
v2: s/false/-EINVAL/ (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220503182242.18797-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
A new programming step was added to combo and TC PLL sequences.
If override_AFC_startup is set in VBT, driver should overwrite
AFC_startup value to 0x0 or 0x7 in PLL's div0 register.
The current understating is that only TGL needs this and all other
display 12 and newer platforms will have a older VBT or a newer VBT
with override_AFC_startup set to 0 but in any case there is a
drm_warn_on_once() to let us know if this is not true.
v2:
- specification updated, now AFC can be override to 0x0 or 0x7
- not using a union for div0 (Imre)
- following previous wrong vbt naming: bits instead of bytes (Imre)
BSpec: 49204
BSpec: 20122
BSpec: 49968
BSpec: 71360
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220216134059.25348-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Move struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs to intel_dpll_mgr.c, as no other
place needs to have access to it. We also don't need to have kernel-doc
documentation for file internal structures, so drop them while at it.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220119110528.2377899-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
All the other places we have use pipes instead of crtc indices
when tracking resource usage. Life is easier when we do it
the same way always, so switch the dpll mgr to using pipes as
well. Looks like it was actually mixing these up in some cases
so it would not even have worked correctly except when the
device has a contiguous set of pipes starting from pipe A.
Granted, that is the typical case but supposedly it may not
always hold on modern hw.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210224144214.24803-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
The clock readout for DDI encoders needs to moved into the encoders.
To that end intel_dpll_readout_hw_state() needs to happen after
the encoder readout as otherwise it can't correctly populate
the PLL crtc_mask/active_mask bitmasks.
v2: Populate DPLL ref clocks before the encoder->get_config()
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210225161225.30746-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Currently the DPLL .get_freq() uses pll->state.hw_state which
is not the thing we actually read out (except during driver
load/resume). Outside of that pll->state.hw_state is just the
thing we committed last time around. During state check we
just read the thing into crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, so that
is what we should use for calculating the DPLL output frequency.
I think we used to do this so that the results of the readout
were actually used, but somehow it got changed when the
.get_freq() refactoring happened.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109231239.17002-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
DG1 has 4 DPLLs where DPLL0 and DPLL1 drive DDIA/B and
DPLL2 and DPLL3 drive DDI-TC1/DDI-TC2.
Introduce DG1_DPLL_CFCRx() helper macros to configure
DPLL registers.
Bspec: 50288, 50299
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
