drm_*() macros can show the device a message came from.
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Cc: Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250627143432.3222843-2-superm1@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
legacy-pm, kv-dpm and si-dpm have prints while changing power states
that don't have a level and thus are printed by default. These are
not useful at runtime for most people, so decrease them to debug.
Reported-by: Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4322
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250627143432.3222843-1-superm1@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Execution cannot reach this statement: case POWER_STATE_TYPE_BALAN.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Yang Wang <kevinyang.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The amdgpu_free_extended_power_table is called in every error-handling
paths of amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table. However, after the following
call chain of returning:
amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table
|-> kv_dpm_init / si_dpm_init
(the only two caller of amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table)
|-> kv_dpm_sw_init / si_dpm_sw_init
(the only caller of kv_dpm_init / si_dpm_init, accordingly)
|-> kv_dpm_fini / si_dpm_fini
(goto dpm_failed in xx_dpm_sw_init)
|-> amdgpu_free_extended_power_table
As above, the amdgpu_free_extended_power_table is called twice in this
returning chain and thus a double-free is triggered. Similarily, the
last kfree in amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table also cause a double free
with amdgpu_free_extended_power_table in kv_dpm_fini.
Fixes: 84176663e7 ("drm/amd/pm: create a new holder for those APIs used only by legacy ASICs(si/kv)")
Signed-off-by: Zhipeng Lu <alexious@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first.
This read may exceed the destination size limit.
This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read
overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1].
In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
strlcpy() here with strscpy().
No return values were used, so direct replacement is safe.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89
Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522155245.2336818-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com
The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.
By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.
Fixes: 3712e7a494 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Avoid cross callings which make lock protection enforcement
on amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level() impossible.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of centralizing all headers in the same folder. Separate them into
different folders and place them among those source files those who really
need them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
