Adds bootph-* properties to the leaf nodes to enable bootloaders to
utilise them.
Following adds bootph-* to:
- main_uart0, mcu_uart0(DM), wkup_uart0(TIFS) for Traces
- mmc0, mmc1, usb0, ospi0, ospi1, hbmc for enabling various bootmodes.
Reviewed-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024-b4-upstream-bootph-all-v6-10-2af90e3a4fe7@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware like of R5F and DSPs in the MAIN voltage domain
use timers. Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to
"reserved" to avoid any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+==============+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+==============+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer12 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer13 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core0 | main_timer14 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core1 | main_timer15 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_0 | main_timer0 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c71_0 | main_timer2 |
+-------------------+--------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-3-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J721E EVM board has two R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and
both of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch
both of these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the
number of R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-3-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Add the bootph-all property to the memory node so that it can be
accessed by FDT functions at bootloader stage.
The bootloader requires the memory node to be able to initialize and set
the size of the DRAM banks. For this purpose, make sure all memory nodes
are present and standardized, and modify them if not.
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506110203.3230255-1-n-francis@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
license for SoC and TI evm device tree files. This allows for Linux
kernel device tree to be used in other Operating System ecosystems
such as Zephyr or FreeBSD.
While at this, update the GPL-2.0 to be GPL-2.0-only to be in sync
with latest SPDX conventions (GPL-2.0 is deprecated).
While at this, update the TI copyright year to sync with current year
to indicate license change (and add it at least for one file which was
missing TI copyright).
Cc: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Cc: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@baylibre.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240122145539.194512-9-nm@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Each "mboxes" item is composed of two cells. It seems these got split
as they appeared to be two items in an array, but are actually a single
two-cell item. Rejoin these cells.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123222536.875797-10-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
This patch adds support for TPS6594 PMIC family on wakup I2C0 bus.
Theses devices provides regulators (bucks and LDOs), but also
GPIOs, a RTC, a watchdog, an ESM (Error Signal Monitor)
which monitors the SoC error output signal, and a PFSM
(Pre-configurable Finite State Machine) which manages the
operational modes of the PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208114919.3429562-4-n-francis@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
C6x DSP nodes defined in the top-level J721e SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and will not be functional unless they are extended with both mboxes and
memory-region information.
As theses only known about at the board integration level, these nodes
should only be enabled when provided with this information.
Disable the C6x DSP nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are given the required mboxes and memory-region on a given board.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Acked-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
Tested-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809180145.53158-3-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
C7x DSP nodes defined in the top-level J721e SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and will not be functional unless they are extended with both mboxes and
memory-region information.
As theses only known about at the board integration level, these nodes
should only be enabled when provided with this information.
Disable the C7x DSP nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are given the required mboxes and memory-region on a given board.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Acked-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
Tested-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809180145.53158-1-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
OSPI nodes defined in the top-level J721e SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux and
device information.
As the attached OSPI device is only known about at the board integration
level, these nodes should only be enabled when provided with this
information.
Disable the OSPI nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually pinned out on a given board.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810003814.85450-6-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Prepare for pinctrl-single yaml binding and unify pin group node names.
Let's standardize on pin group node naming ending in -pins. As we don't
necessarily have a SoC specific compatible property for pinctrl-single.
I'd rather not add a pattern match for pins somewhere in the name for all
the users.
Trying to add matches for pins-default will be futile as on the earlier
SoCs we've already seen names like pins-sleep, pins-idle, pins-off and so
on that would need to be matched.
And as the node is a pin group, let's prefer to use naming -pins rather
than -pin as more pins may need to be added to the pin group later on.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
[vigneshr@ti.com: Rebase onto latest ti/next and extend to new nodes]
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Enable wakeup_i2c and use un-used pinmux. While at it, describe the
board detection eeprom present on the board.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601183151.1000157-6-nm@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Enable wakeup_i2c and use un-used pinmux. While at it, describe the
board detection eeprom present on the board.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601183151.1000157-6-nm@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
When referring to array of phandles, using <> to separate the array
entries is better notation as it makes potential errors with phandle and
cell arguments easier to catch. Fix the outliers to be consistent with
the rest of the usage.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606182220.3661956-3-nm@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Describe OSPI and QSPI flash partition information through device tree,
this helps to remove passing partition information through the mtdparts
commandline parameter which requires maintaining the partition information
in a string format. J721E SoM has a MT35 64 MiB OSPI flash and MT25 64 MiB
QSPI flash both with sector size of 128 KiB thus the size of the smallest
partition is chosen as 128KiB, the partition names and offsets are chosen
according to the corresponding name and offsets in bootloader.
Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230513141712.27346-2-vaishnav.a@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
J721E SoM has a HyperFlash and HyperRam connected to HyperBus memory
controller, add corresponding node, pinmux and partitions for the same.
HyperBus is muxed with OSPI and only one controller can be active at a
time, therefore keep HyperBus node disabled. Bootloader will detect the
external mux state through a wkup gpio and enable the node as required.
Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230513123313.11462-3-vaishnav.a@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Mailbox nodes defined in the top-level J721e SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with a chosen interrupt
and connection to a remote processor.
As the remote processors depend on memory nodes which are only known at
the board integration level, these nodes should only be enabled when
provided with the above information.
Disable the Mailbox nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually used on a given board.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020160305.18711-9-afd@ti.com
Specifying partitions directly under the flash nodes is deprecated. A
partitions node should used instead. The address and size cells are not
needed. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Apurva Nandan<a-nandan@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217181025.1815118-2-p.yadav@ti.com
The OSPI flash nodes are missing a space before the opening brace. Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Apurva Nandan<a-nandan@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217181025.1815118-1-p.yadav@ti.com
Set the Tx bus width to 8 so 8D-8D-8D mode can be selected. Change the
frequency to 25 MHz. This is the frequency that the flash has been
successfully tested with in Octal DTR mode. The total performance should
still increase since 8D-8D-8D mode should be at least twice as fast as
1S-1S-8S mode.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210305153926.3479-2-p.yadav@ti.com
Two carveout reserved memory nodes each have been added for each of the
R5F remote processor devices within both the MCU and MAIN domains for the
TI J721E EVM boards. These nodes are assigned to the respective rproc
device nodes as well. The first region will be used as the DMA pool for
the rproc device, and the second region will furnish the static carveout
regions for the firmware memory.
The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
device. The R5F processors do not have an MMU, and as such require the
exact memory used by the firmwares to be set-aside. The firmware images
do not require any RSC_CARVEOUT entries in their resource tables either
to allocate the memory for firmware memory segments.
Note that the R5F1 carveouts are needed only if the R5F cluster is running
in Split (non-LockStep) mode. The reserved memory nodes can be disabled
later on if there is no use-case defined to use the corresponding
remote processor.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-9-s-anna@ti.com
Add the required 'mboxes' property to all the R5F processors for the
TI J721E common processor board. The mailboxes and some shared memory
are required for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack
between the host processor and each of the R5Fs. The nodes are therefore
added in the common k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file so that all of these can
be co-located.
The chosen sub-mailboxes match the values used in the current firmware
images. This can be changed, if needed, as per the system integration
needs after making appropriate changes on the firmware side as well.
Note that any R5F Core1 resources are needed and used only when that
R5F cluster is configured for Split-mode.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-8-s-anna@ti.com
Building with W=2 throws up a bunch of easy to fixup warnings..
node_name_chars_strict is one of them.. Knock those out.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903130015.21361-9-nm@ti.com
Add a reserved memory node to reserve a portion of the DDR memory to be
used for performing inter-processor communication between all the remote
processors running RTOS on the TI J721E EVM boards. 28 MB of memory is
reserved for this purpose, and this accounts for all the vrings and vring
buffers between all the possible pairs of remote processors.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-9-s-anna@ti.com
Two carveout reserved memory nodes have been added for the lone C71x DSP
remote processor device present within the MAIN voltage domain for the TI
J721E EVM boards. These nodes are assigned to the respective rproc device
node as well. The first region will be used as the DMA pool for the rproc
device, and the second region will furnish the static carveout regions for
the firmware memory.
The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
device. The C71x DSP processor does support a MMU called CMMU, but is not
currently supported and as such requires the exact memory used by the
firmware to be set-aside. The firmware images currently do not need any
RSC_CARVEOUT entries either in their resource tables to allocate the
memory for firmware memory segments.
The reserved memory nodes can be disabled later on if there is no use-case
defined to use the C71x DSP remoteproc processor.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-8-s-anna@ti.com
Add the required 'mboxes' property to the C71x DSP processor for the TI
J721E common processor board. The mailboxes and some shared memory are
required for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack between
the host processor and each of the DSPs. The nodes are therefore added
in the common k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file so that all of these can be
co-located.
The chosen sub-mailboxes match the values used in the current firmware
images. This can be changed, if needed, as per the system integration
needs after making appropriate changes on the firmware side as well.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-7-s-anna@ti.com
Two carveout reserved memory nodes each have been added for each of the
C66x DSP remote processor devices present within the MAIN voltage domain
for the TI J721E EVM boards. These nodes are assigned to the respective
rproc device nodes as well. The first region will be used as the DMA pool
for the rproc devices, and the second region will furnish the static
carveout regions for the firmware memory.
The minimum granularity on the Cache settings on C66x DSP cores is 16 MB,
so the DMA memory regions are chosen such that they are in separate 16 MB
regions for each DSP, while reserving a total of 16 MB for each DSP and
not changing the overall DSP remoteproc carveouts.
The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
device. The C66x DSP processors do not have an MMU, and as such require the
exact memory used by the firmwares to be set-aside. The firmware images
do not require any RSC_CARVEOUT entries in their resource tables to
allocate the memory for firmware memory segments.
The reserved memory nodes can be disabled later on if there is no use-case
defined to use the corresponding remote processor.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-5-s-anna@ti.com
Add the required 'mboxes' property to both the C66x DSP processors for the
TI J721E common processor board. The mailboxes and some shared memory are
required for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack between
the host processor and each of the DSPs. The nodes are therefore added
in the common k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file so that all of these can be
co-located.
The chosen sub-mailboxes match the values used in the current firmware
images. This can be changed, if needed, as per the system integration
needs after making appropriate changes on the firmware side as well.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-4-s-anna@ti.com
The commit eb9f9173d0 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board:
Add IPC sub-mailbox nodes") has added the sub-mailbox nodes used by
various remote processors and disabled the unused mailbox clusters
directly in the k3-j721e-common-proc-board dts file. Move all of these
nodes into the k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file instead to co-locate all the
mailboxes and the soon to be added DDR reserved-memory carveout nodes
used by remoteprocs within the same dtsi file.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825172145.13186-2-s-anna@ti.com
Rationale:
Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
Deterministic algorithm:
For each file:
If not .svg:
For each line:
If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
If neither `\bgnu\.org/license`, nor `\bmozilla\.org/MPL\b`:
If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
return 200 OK and serve the same content:
Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Add Support for J721E Common Processor board support.
The EVM architecture is as follows:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| +-------------------------------------------+ |
| | | |
| | Add-on Card 1 Options | |
| | | |
| +-------------------------------------------+ |
| |
| |
| +-------------------+ |
| | | |
| | SOM | |
| +--------------+ | | |
| | | | | |
| | Add-on | +-------------------+ |
| | Card 2 | | Power Supply
| | Options | | |
| | | | |
| +--------------+ | <---
+------------------------------------------------------+
Common Processor Board
Common Processor board is the baseboard that has most of the actual
connectors, power supply etc. A SOM (System on Module) is plugged on
to the common processor board and this contains the SoC, PMIC, DDR and
basic high speed components necessary for functionality. Add-n card
options add further functionality (such as additional Audio, Display,
networking options).
Note:
A) The minimum configuration required to boot up the board is System On
Module(SOM) + Common Processor Board.
B) Since there is just a single SOM and Common Processor Board, we are
maintaining common processor board as the base dts and SOM as the dtsi
that we include. In the future as more SOM's appear, we should move
common processor board as a dtsi and include configurations as dts.
C) All daughter cards beyond the basic boards shall be maintained as
overlays.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
