The display IPs in MediaTek SoCs support being interconnected with
different instances of DDP IPs (for example, merge0 or merge1) and/or
with different DDP IPs (for example, rdma can be connected with either
color, dpi, dsi, merge, etc), forming a full Display Data Path that
ends with an actual display.
The final display pipeline is effectively board specific, as it does
depend on the display that is attached to it, and eventually on the
sensors supported by the board (for example, Adaptive Ambient Light
would need an Ambient Light Sensor, otherwise it's pointless!), other
than the output type.
Add support for OF graphs to most of the MediaTek DDP (display) bindings
to add flexibility to build custom hardware paths, hence enabling board
specific configuration of the display pipeline and allowing to finally
migrate away from using hardcoded paths.
Please note that - while this commit retains retro-compatibility with
old device trees - it will break the ABI for mediatek,dsi and for
mediatek,dpi for the sake of consistency between the `ports` in all
MediaTek DRM drivers versus DRM bridge drivers as in the previous
binding, MediaTek was using `port` (implicitly, port@0) as an OUTPUT,
while now the first port is an INPUT, and the second one is an OUTPUT,
which is consistent with other DRM drivers which can be chained to
drm/mediatek.
As for maintainability concerns, I am aware that the old device tree
will not be actively tested anymore, but retrocompatibility breakages
will *not* be more likely to happen in the future because any addition
to the graph (new drivers) will be done only for features present on
newer SoCs, keeping the old ones (and their default pipeline) untouched.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org> # on kontron-sbc-i1200
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20241017103809.156056-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Lists (items) with one item should be just enum because it is shorter,
simpler and does not confuse, if one wants to add new entry with a
fallback. Convert all of them to enums. OTOH, leave unused "oneOf"
entries in anticipation of further growth of the entire binding.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230414083311.12197-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To avoid failure of dt_binding_check perform a slight refactoring
of the examples: the main block is kept, but that required fixing
the address and size cells, plus the inclusion of missing dt-bindings
headers, required to parse some of the values assigned to various
properties.
Fixes: 4ed545e7d1 ("dt-bindings: display: mediatek: disp: split each block to individual yaml")
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Tested-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@medaitek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220309134702.9942-5-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com
1. Remove mediatek,dislpay.txt
2. Split each display function block to individual yaml file.
Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
